Jake Monday, February 28, 2005 at 23:39:44     24.61.129.90
Hi Mark
Owen Murray Monday, February 28, 2005 at 22:30:35     70.176.9.40
Hi Dave, This is my first time on the Chat, but I've been a long time member. I met Ray in 1967 along with Jack Howland. Ray was a big influence to the collectors in those days. He will be missed.
Owen Murray Monday, February 28, 2005 at 22:05:04     70.176.9.40
Hi Dave, This is my first time on the Chat, but I've been a long time member. I met Ray in 1967 along with Jack Howland. Ray was a big influence to the collectors in those days. He will be missed.
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 28, 2005 at 21:22:45     67.177.96.92
Dave: I didn't know Ray but I'm sorry to hear of his passing.
Dave Kent Monday, February 28, 2005 at 19:55:57     68.9.230.72
We've received word of the passing of Ray Costa of Vallejo, Calif., a long time USCS member and a founder of the Saginaw Chapter. During the 1950s and 1960s Ray was instrumental in producing and selling covers for nuclear submarine construction events at Mare Island. He did covers both for the National Association of Supervisors (noted in the cachet as NAS), and the Saginaw Chapter. He served the USCS as national president in the 1960 and spent nearly 20 years on the Board of Directors. He was for years one of the USCS top recruiters -- I'm one of the people he sponsored as a member.
mike meister Monday, February 28, 2005 at 13:44:40     152.163.100.200
reveid covers today for Jimmy Carter FDC under seperate cover from Groton with fancy canel but no cachet. These were covers taht I had mailed directly to the boat.
lbbrennan Monday, February 28, 2005 at 11:28:14     38.117.188.10
The Military Sealift Command (MSC) hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19) underway in the Indian Ocean, off the coast of Sumatra, Indonesia. Mercy is serving as an enabling platform to assist humanitarian operations ashore in ways that host nations and international relief organization find useful. Mercy is currently off the waters of Indonesia in support of Operation Unified Assistance, the humanitarian relief effort to aid the victims of the tsunami that struck Southeast Asia.

Indian Ocean (Feb. 25, 2005) – The Military Sealift Command (MSC) combat stores ship USNS San Jose (T-AFS 7) underway in the Indian Ocean, off the coast of Sumatra, Indonesia. San Jose is currently supporting Operation Unified Assistance, the humanitarian relief effort to aid the victims of the tsunami that struck Southeast Asia.

Indian Ocean (Feb. 25, 2005) – The High Speed Vessel Two (HSV 2) Swift underway in the Indian Ocean, off the coast of Sumatra, Indonesia. Swift is currently supporting Operation Unified Assistance, the humanitarian relief effort to aid the victims of the tsunami that struck Southeast Asia.

Indian Ocean (Feb. 25, 2005) – The High Speed Vessel Two (HSV 2) Swift, left, Military Sealift Command (MSC) hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19), center, and MSC supply ship USNS San Jose (T-AFS 7) shown operating in formation in the Indian Ocean. Mercy is serving as an enabling platform to assist humanitarian operations ashore in ways that host nations and international relief organization find useful. Mercy is currently off the waters of Indonesia in support of Operation Unified Assistance, the humanitarian relief effort to aid the victims of the tsunami that struck Southeast Asia.


lbbrennan Monday, February 28, 2005 at 11:25:49     38.117.188.10
Indian Ocean (Feb. 24, 2005) – Volunteer healthcare workers from the non-governmental organization “Project Hope” board a MH-60S Seahawk helicopter, assigned to Helicopter Combat Support Squadron Five (HC-5), aboard the Military Sealift Command (MSC) hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19). The helicopter will fly the volunteers to Banda Aceh on the island of Sumatra, Indonesia. From Banda Aceh, the volunteers are scheduled to fly to Singapore and then back to the United States. Mercy is serving as an enabling platform to assist humanitarian operations ashore in ways that host nations and international relief organization find useful. Mercy is currently off the waters of Indonesia in support of Operation Unified Assistance, the humanitarian relief effort to aid the victims of the tsunami that struck Southeast Asia.
lbbrennan Monday, February 28, 2005 at 11:24:32     38.117.188.10
Lincoln CSG Returns Home from Southeast Asia
Release Date: 2/23/2005 4:44:00 PM

SAN DIEGO (NNS) -- The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) Carrier Strike Group (ALCSG), including Abraham Lincoln and Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 2, returns home next week after an extended deployment to the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean.

Lincoln will make a brief stop at Naval Station (NAVSTA) Pearl Harbor, Feb. 23. CVW-2 aircraft will fly off Lincoln while off the coast of San Diego Feb. 28. Lincoln will pull into Naval Air Station (NAS) North Island on the morning of March 1 to offload the rest of CVW-2. Lincoln will return to Naval Station Everett, Wash., on the morning of March 4.

As was the previous case for Lincoln, along with accompanying air wing and ships, the current deployment turned out to be anything but typical. After a port visit to Hong Kong over the Christmas holiday season, ALCSG immediately responded to provide humanitarian assistance and disaster relief in the wake of the Indian Ocean tsunami in Southeast Asia.

On New Year’s Day, Sailors from the ALCSG began to deliver vital food, water and medicine to help stabilize life-threatening situations, as well as provide helicopter transportation for displaced persons. From first light to sundown, helicopters from San Diego-based Helicopter Anti-submarine Squadron (HS) 2 “Golden Falcons,” Helicopter Anti-submarine Squadron Light (HSL) 47 “Saberhawks” and Helicopter Combat Support Squadron (HC) 11 "Gunbearers" carried out missions into Banda Aceh, the provincial capital, and along the Sumatran coastline, rendered inaccessible due to the devastation caused by the tsunami.

From Jan. 1 until Feb. 4, ALCSG aircraft flew 1,747 missions in support of Operation Unified Assistance (OUA), carried 5,711,866 pounds of supplies, including 16,308 gallons of water, and transported 3,043 passengers. Over 1,200 crew members from the ship and air wing volunteered to go ashore and assist. Medical personnel from Lincoln treated 259 people. Also, more than 200 patients were medically evacuated for further treatment.

Besides OUA involvement, Lincoln made port calls to Hong Kong and Singapore, and participated in six community relation projects with 125 volunteers. The ship also hosted dignitaries such as U.S. Ambassador to Singapore Frank Lavin; U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia, B. Lynn Pascoe; Dr. Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Secretary of Defense; and Commander, U.S. Pacific Command Adm. Thomas Fargo.

The ship’s involvement attracted media locally from Southeast Asia, such as Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore, as well as numerous other national and international media outlets. In all, Lincoln hosted 111 media representatives aboard while off the coast of Sumatra, as well as held media availability sessions in Hong Kong for 63 foreign and local press, and 19 local press members in Singapore.

Lincoln’s involvement in OUA highlighted the entire ALCSG surge deployment under the Fleet Response Plan (FRP), as well as the Navy’s sea-basing concept of being able to undertake such a mission solely from the sea. Adm. Walter Doran, commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet, recently lauded the effort, saying, “It showed the agility of naval forces. It showed our ability to get there quickly.”

ALCSG is one of the first carrier strike groups to deploy under the Navy’s new FRP. The FRP, unveiled in 2003 by Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vern Clark, redefines the manner that the Navy deploys its forces to more closely match operational needs.

FRP deployments are hinged on the concept of “presence with a purpose” in various strategic theaters worldwide. While deployed in the Western Pacific, ALCSG supported the nation’s defense and cooperative security commitments overseas, such as a joint training exercises with Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force ships.

Capt. Kendall Card commands Lincoln. It is the flagship for the ALCSG, commanded by Rear Adm. Doug Crowder. Lincoln is also home to Destroyer Squadron 9, commanded by Capt. Jon W. Kaufman, and CVW-2, commanded by Capt. Lawrence D. Burt.

The ALCSG consists of the guided-missile cruiser USS Shiloh (CG 67) and guided-missile destroyer USS Benfold (DDG 65), both homeported at NAVSTA San Diego. Other ships include NAVSTA Everett-based guided-missile destroyer USS Shoup (DDG 86) and NAVSTA Bremerton, Wash.-based fast-combat support ship USNS Rainier (T-AOE 7). HC-11, Det. 2, assigned to Rainer, is based at NAS North Island.

CVW-2 consists of HS-2, HSL-47, and Fleet Logistics Support Squadron (VRC) 30, Det. 4 from NAS North Island; Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 2, VFA-137, and VFA-151 from NAS Lemoore, Calif.; Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) 116 from NAS Point Mugu, Calif.; Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) 131, from NAS Whidbey Island, Wash.; and VFA-82 from Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort, S.C.



lbbrennan Monday, February 28, 2005 at 11:22:09     38.117.188.10
USS Mount Whitney Becomes U.S. 6th Fleet Flagship; USS La Salle to Decommission
Story Number: NNS050225-03
Release Date: 2/25/2005 2:10:00 PM

From U.S. 6th Fleet Public Affairs

GAETA, Italy (NNS) -- Vice Adm. Harry Ulrich, commander, U.S. 6th Fleet, transferred his flag from USS La Salle (AGF 3) to USS Mount Whitney (LCC/JCC 20) Feb. 25 in a ceremony aboard both ships.

“During its time here, La Salle has distinguished itself over and over by providing simply outstanding support to the 6th Fleet staff, and also to Striking and Support Forces NATO staff,” said Ulrich. “I am greatly anticipating my first embark aboard USS Mount Whitney with the Joint Command Lisbon staff this spring.”

Mount Whitney followed the flagship turnover with a change of command. Mount Whitney’s former Commanding Officer, Capt. Christopher Wode, was excited about the ship’s new role.

“I’m thrilled to be here in Gaeta," Wode said. "This is the third time in my career that I’ve had the opportunity to spend time in Gaeta. This is a wonderful place to live and work.”

Mount Whitney most recently served as the command ship for U.S. 2nd Fleet in Norfolk, Va. Mount Whitney’s transition to U.S. 6th Fleet brings increased capabilities and a new ship manning philosophy to Naval Forces in Europe.

In preparation for its new role, Mount Whitney underwent a two-month shipyard period to upgrade automated electronics systems. Also, Mount Whitney’s size advantage over La Salle allows for enhanced command and control capabilities for U.S. 6th Fleet, as well as NATO forces in Europe.

To improve efficiency and effectiveness, Mount Whitney is also embracing a new manning model. Down from 576 active-duty Sailors, ship’s company now includes a mix of 157 active-duty Navy and 146 civilian mariners, a change expected to save the Navy more than $100,000 annually, with the same or higher operational capabilities.

The transfer marks more than a decade of La Salle’s exemplary service as the U.S. 6th Fleet flagship. La Salle immediately departs for Norfolk, Va., where it will be decommissioned after 40 years of service.

“This past year has been particularly successful. This ship has been underway every month, except for October’s maintenance period,” said La Salle Commanding Officer, Capt. Herman Shelanski. “This crew performed superbly.”

Commissioned as an amphibious transport dock ship (LPD) in February 1964, and converted to a miscellaneous command ship (AGF) in 1972, La Salle served as U.S. 6th Fleet flagship from November 1994 to February 2005.

Prior to U.S. 6th Fleet flagship duties, La Salle was forward-deployed as flagship for the Middle East Force. March 12, 1991, it was the first U.S. Navy warship to enter the newly liberated port of Ash Shuaybah, Kuwait.

“USS La Salle has performed admirably, and its readiness in this area has been an enormous contribution here,” said Ulrich. “Mount Whitney, you will have some giant shoes to fill in taking over as my flagship. This is also the European flagship. Mount Whitney’s capabilities are just magnificent, and I have no doubt that Mount Whitney will serve the 6th Fleet extremely well.”

Mount Whitney is already accustomed to European and African waters, as it served as temporary U.S. 6th Fleet flagship in 1999, NATO command headquarters in Kosovo, and supported Operation Enduring Freedom on a seven-month deployment to the Horn of Africa region.

Mount Whitney was constructed by the Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Company, and commissioned in 1971. It is named for the 14,946-foot peak in the Sierra-Nevada range in California, the highest point in the lower continental United States. Mount Whitney is 190 meters long, 32 meters wide and can reach speeds up to 23 knots


lbbrennan Monday, February 28, 2005 at 11:20:29     38.117.188.10
Great cover of the month for March. Happy St. Patrick's day thanks to Steve Shay.
lbbrennan Monday, February 28, 2005 at 09:01:04     38.117.188.10
quiet weekend. Everyone must have been working on their collections. The Northeast had a major snow on Friday and we're standing by for another one today. Nearly 2 feet of snow in 4 days is a bit too much, particularly at the end of Feb. This may be the first time that NYC has enjoyed three consecutive years of 40 + inches of snow since they started recording in the mid 1860s.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 27, 2005 at 20:01:13     68.57.210.254
Auction closed. Thank you to the 13 bidders!
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 27, 2005 at 18:00:08     68.57.210.254
Get those last minute bids in. All items at http://thesaltysailor.com/ships.htm are included in the auction.

2 hour warning ;-)


Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 27, 2005 at 16:20:58     68.57.210.254
4 hours to auction close.
pacoastie Sunday, February 27, 2005 at 13:11:29     151.197.61.120
OK - make that Afghanistan!
pacoastie Sunday, February 27, 2005 at 13:09:02     151.197.61.120
The below is an edited version of a message from my son in Afganestan. Seems like changes constangly take place. Anyone see the original version from the USPS? Rich Hoffner

Hi all, just wanted to pass this along, no more rank or shop allowed on the
mail, so don't put 1stLt Hoffner, J.J. /S-2 just Hoffner, J.J.
-----Original Message-----
From: Serpas, Jennifer CPL
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 4:59 AM
To: Name of Unit-ALLHANDS
Subject: Hightened Postal Security Procedures

As Per the U.S. Post Office, Due to hightened security please do not include your rank on any outgoing or incoming mail & parcels. Please form your family members and friends to exercise these precautions.

V/R, SSgt Torres


Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 27, 2005 at 08:18:46     68.57.210.254
12 hours remain... if you haven't placed your bids yet, you still have time. Covers shown on the website: http://thesaltysailor.com/ships.htm are up for bid (rules listed below). I also have 15 images of covers not shown on the website that are included in the auction... e-mail me if you'd like me to send you these images. Good Luck!
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 27, 2005 at 08:15:47     68.57.210.254
Does anyone have any Scott # 3372 - 3377 Hand-Painted FDCs for sale? Any USS Yosemite or USS California Rogak covers for sale? Any Signed North Pole covers for sale? Any Hand-Painted Submarine Commissioning covers for sale? Thanks! lafoe@comcast.net
Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 20:16:55     68.57.210.254
24 hours left to bid on the auction... Good Luck!
lbbrennan Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 19:40:33     216.9.242.14
John Young many thanks for okg received upon return from Newport
prometheus Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 19:08:24     4.247.242.247
Picked up a couple more for my Naval markings/sailors ,mail today

they are at
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/ProsStamps/two/batch13-05011.jpg


and
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/ProsStamps/two/batch13-05010.jpg

the Wyoming and the Virginia

also picked up a PC from a sailor serving on "old half- seas Under " his return address notation anyone with an idea of what ship this was. In the card he notes "seems like an Officer for each of us seamen"

Thanks as Usual

Hello Jake


Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 13:26:22     68.57.210.254
1604 Danaher Street
Indianapolis, IN 46217
herb rommel Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 13:26:02     68.109.122.54
Dave, Great MPS journal.
herb rommel Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 13:25:37     68.109.122.54
Larry Lafoe; what is your mailing address?
Dan Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 11:54:58     24.25.181.25
USS Pittsburgh here for overhaul
Shipyard commander hopes work can be finished record-breaking time
By Douglas P. Guarino
Democrat Staff Writer
dguarino@fosters.com


The USS Pittsburgh, her crew of 13 officers and 121 enlisted personnel, arrives at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on Thursday afternoon. (Beth Lorden/Democrat photo)


KITTERY, Maine — The Portsmouth Naval Shipyard’s latest, $160 million overhaul project showed up at its front door Thursday.

The USS Pittsburgh, along with its crew of 13 officers and 121 enlisted personnel arrived at about 1 p.m., according to a statement released by Public Affairs Officer Deborah White.

While at the yard, the nuclear submarine will undergo various maintenance work and receive several system upgrades. Kittery will serve has the host community for the crew.

During an address to the Dover Rotary Club on Wednesday, shipyard commander Capt. John Iverson said the yard hoped to complete its work on the Pittsburgh in record-breaking time.

A Los Angeles-class attack submarine, the Pittsburgh is one of the most advanced vessels in the world, the statement says. Constructed in 1983 and launched in 1984, the sub was commissioned in 1985.

In December 2004, the Pittsburgh completed a four-month Southern Pacific deployment which included two excursions through the Panama Canal.

On March 21, 2003, the sub launched its first-strike missiles in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

The Pittsburgh’s commanding officer, Cmdr. David J. Hahn, graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy with distinction in 1985. After completing nuclear power and basic submarine training he reported to the Casimir Pulaski.

In 1989, how was selected as a flag lieutenant and aide to the superintendent at the Naval Academy. he then reported as engineer officer to William H. Bates where he completed three deployments.

He then served at Submarine Development Squadron 12 in New London, Conn., followed by a tour of duty aboard the Springfield.

Hahn has been awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Navy Commendation Medal, the Navy Achievement Medal and various campaign and unit awards.


Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 11:04:08     68.57.210.254
Auction ends in 32 hours ;-)
Roger Saturday, February 26, 2005 at 06:50:41     67.141.132.104
Hi Guys:
Got some covers back form USS EISENHOWER and USS T. ROOSEVELT yesterday with very nice short bar killers cancelled on President's Day. I have covers out to all the "presidential carriers" for that date...all have the new Ronald Reagan stamp and my presidential portrait cachets on them, or my Mount Rushmore cachet.


Herb Rommel Friday, February 25, 2005 at 21:41:19     68.109.122.54
correction - aircraft carrier
Herb Rommel Friday, February 25, 2005 at 21:40:37     68.109.122.54
I was in a thrift shop and I saw a paperback with a carrie on the cover, so I picked it up. It is Nimitz Class by patrich Robinson. It is a great novel with a lot of technical data. I enjoyed it and I recommend it.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 25, 2005 at 19:32:42     68.57.210.254
For you Nuclear Sub cover collectors... I am now in the possession of 350 extra Nuclear Submarine Commissioning covers... all are unaddressed, all are in excellent ++ condition, all are different. If anyone is interested, they are for sale as a group for $.75 each ppd. They range in date from SSN-614 through SSN-23.
SteveS Friday, February 25, 2005 at 19:11:50     4.246.87.146
Gee, the USPS finally delivered my February Log today. Thank you!
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 25, 2005 at 17:29:10     68.57.210.254
I have 45 covers that aren't posted on the website that are part of the auction... please e-mail me at: lafoe@comcast.net if you'd like scans of the 45 covers.
Chas Henry Friday, February 25, 2005 at 12:31:18     64.168.104.154
But, hey, look at this from Military.Com:

USS Jimmy Carter Joins Navy Fleet
The USS Jimmy Carter enters the Navy's fleet as the most heavily armed submarine ever built, and as the last of the Seawolf class of attack subs....More...(hit link, I can't download...)


Chas Henry Friday, February 25, 2005 at 12:26:02     64.168.104.154
Larry LaFoe - Is there anything besides submarines in the auction? (Is this now the Universal SUBMARINE Cancellation Society? - Hmmm, a few DDs could handle that...(:=))
Duane Wilson Friday, February 25, 2005 at 10:53:04     64.136.49.226
Received cover back from USS Iwo Jima postmarked 19 Feb as requested. Hampton Roads PO added their cancel over it.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 25, 2005 at 09:30:19     68.57.210.254
Auction Clarification: I purchased all the items shown on the website -

http://thesaltysailor.com/ships.htm

The covers shown on the website are the covers included in the auction (minus what Larsen needs for his collection).


john young Friday, February 25, 2005 at 09:29:59     205.188.116.200
lbbrennan: Mailed 1935 USCS Logs & other
material yesterday!
lbbrennan Friday, February 25, 2005 at 08:30:04     216.9.242.14
Larry interesting auction good luck
lbbrennan Friday, February 25, 2005 at 08:29:52     216.9.242.14
Larry interesting auction good luck
lbbrennan Friday, February 25, 2005 at 08:23:45     216.9.242.14
Good to hear re Hank Baxter
lbbrennan Friday, February 25, 2005 at 08:22:16     216.9.242.14
Stuck on my blackbery with 10 inches of snowb in Newport nice view of sara and fid
Stewart B. Milstein Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 23:06:18     12.72.120.150
Good evening, gentlemen.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 22:10:55     67.177.96.92
Had a guy in tonight to replace the ignitor on my oil burner and we talked while he worked. Turned out to be a navy vet (59-66) and I mentioned cover collecting. He seemed interested and I showed him some of my Northampton Covers. I also wrote down the URL of this site for him. His name is Harold and he's retiring soon. Maybe he'll visit here and get interested in joining. If you "see" him here say hello.
Mike Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 18:28:24     172.196.61.23
Good luck Larry with your auction.
Mike Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 18:27:32     172.196.61.23
Still no February Log in Northern California. Oakland US Postal Service is back to their old tricks.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 18:22:25     68.57.210.254
Larry LaFoe’s First Ever Internet Silent Auction

I purchased this collection for my son’s birthday. There are a lot of covers that he already has in his collection and others that don’t fit into his current collection.

Auction Rules

1. USCS Members are given priority status (non-USCS members may bid, but if a USCS member bids any amount, the USCS member will prevail).

2. Highest bid wins (e-mail date stamp will determine first bidder in case of tie bids). Bids can be a dollar amount or an item/items in trade.

3. Provide a list of covers you desire with offer, your name & your USCS membership number when placing bids.

4. Bids will work as follows: You pay what you bid, e.g., if you bid $5 and someone else bids $8, the item will sell for $8. There are no bid increments, no minimum bids, no reserves, no restrictions… you will either win or someone will outbid you… it’s that simple.

5. Auction ends at 8:00 p.m. SHARP on Sunday, February 27, 2005. Any unsold items will be placed for sale on eBay on Monday, February 28, 2005.

6. All winning bidders will be notified at 8:00 p.m. on Sunday, February 27, 2005. Payment can be made via PayPal to lafoe@comcast.net or via snail mail.

80% of the items can be viewed online at: http://thesaltysailor.com/ships.htm There are approximately 400 covers online, there are links, within links, within links. Let me know if you have any questions. (I guess there is one restriction… items needed for Larsen’s collection will not be sold.)

If you know any other USCS member that collects submarine covers that doesn’t frequent the chat page, feel free to forward this information to them.

Good Luck!

Larry


Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 15:19:50     67.177.96.92
Hi Volker - how are things in Germany?
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 14:47:44     67.177.96.92
Hi Dave, you ready for more snow?
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 14:26:14     67.177.96.92
Larry LaFoe: did you get an email from Comcast about speeding up your connection? They're doing the whole country. We just went to 4 Megabits per second down and 384kbs up.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 13:30:49     67.177.96.92
Just got this from Hank Baxter and thought I'd pass it along.

Hey Amigo's, here are some photo's when of our MK 48 ADCAP torpedoes fired from an Australian submarine hits a surface ship. As has always been said there are two types of ships submarines and targets. Enjoy Hank B.

http://www.ssbn622.homestead.com/sinkex.html


Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 13:27:01     67.177.96.92
Larry Brennan: are you on your Blackberry? I introduced them at The Hartford after seeing them at Comdex many moons ago. Nice idea but the keyboard is a pain in the butt.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 13:25:24     67.177.96.92
Larry LaFoe: I've gotten interested in naval colliers. If you run across any covers from them I'd appreciate an email. List:

Pennant Name
AC-1 Vestal
AC-2 Ontario
AC-3 Jupiter
AC-4 Cyclops
AC-5 Vulcan
AC-6 Mars
AC-7 Hector
AC-8 Neptune
AC-9 Proteus
AC-10 Nereus
AC-11 Orion
AC-12 Jason
AC-13 Abarenda
AC-14 Ajax ex Scindia
AC-15 Brutus
AC-16 Caesar
None Hannibal
None Justin
None Leonidas
None Merrimac
None Quincy
None Saturn
None Southery


Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 13:23:37     67.177.96.92
I can think of worse places to be stuck!

lbbrennan Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 13:21:02     216.9.242.14
Heavy storm at Philly already maybe stuck in newport for dAys
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:47:38     192.249.47.11
Back later.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:47:15     192.249.47.11
Here's Cnet's take on the Mac Mini:
The good: It's the first sub-$500 Mac; extremely compact; whisper quiet; includes iLife '05.

The bad: Meager memory allotment; peripherals--even keyboard and mouse--add to the bill if you don't already own them; case can't be easily opened; slow hard drive; only two USB 2.0 ports.

What's it for: Basic home computing tasks such as sending e-mail, browsing the Web, and light photo editing.

Who's it for: Bargain hunters; those curious about trying the Mac OS X and iLife software; media mavens on the prowl for an HD-capable DVR box.

The bottom line: Apple trimmed some corners to keep the Mac Mini's price so low, but its great design and big software bundle make it a winner among BUDGET PCs.


Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:45:14     192.249.47.11
I'm off to the bank so I'll be away awhile.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:44:55     192.249.47.11
Entry level = low performance. Let's argue digital cameras now. I'm trying to decide between a Nikon CoolPix 8800 and an Olympus C8080. Both 8 megapixel.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:18:54     68.57.210.254
That's a price comparision. It's Apple's entry-level computer... I'd hope they'd compare it to entry-level PCs.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:17:04     192.249.47.11
Later, got to run.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:16:50     192.249.47.11
Larry: it's implied since it's compared to very low-end PCs.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:14:36     68.57.210.254
There's nothing there about performance. Been a tech/engineer for 26 years and there's nothing there.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:14:16     192.249.47.11
He did say that it's a great machine if you want a low-priced basic system.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:11:50     192.249.47.11
This is from Extreme Tech: The Mac Mini is certainly cheap—for a Macintosh. But for your $499, you get a system with a 40GB hard drive, 256MB of DDR333 memory and an ATI Radeon 9200 with an execrable 32MB of video memory. The only reason you even get a 9200 is that Apple's chipsets lack integrated video. Some would say that's a good thing for gamers, but the minimalist 32MB of frame buffer belies that. Did I mention there's no keyboard, mouse, or display?


Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:11:39     68.57.210.254
Greg - I've read it 4 times and it only compares Apples to Oranges (eerrr, I mean PCs). All comparisions are price related.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:08:18     192.249.47.11
Larry: he also said performance wasn't great.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 11:07:37     68.57.210.254
Greg - I read the review at extreme tech and the only concern he had was price. The other 196 people that reviewed his review said price didn't matter... performance is what counts.


Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 10:49:54     192.249.47.11
I used to support both Macs and PCs in another life. Use of the Mac diminished to zero about ten years ago. The Mac is okay if you don't mind paying more for hardware and software. And don't tell me about the new Mac mini. Read the review at Extreme Tech. http://www.extremetech.com/

If you like the Mac fine. But it may not be around too long. There are hints that Apple is shifing focus to the much more lucrative MP3 and consumer electronics market. The weakness of the Mac is that it's single-source hardware.


Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 10:46:16     192.249.47.11
Here's a useful bit of code: Cut and paste the following text into your Browser Address Bar. javascript:alert("The actual URL of this site has been verified as: " + location.protocol + "//" + location.hostname +"/");

It will tell you if someone has directed you to a fake URL.


Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 07:29:11     68.57.210.254
I was in management at HP for 9 years and my wife has been employed at HP for 10 years... but my next computer is still going to be a Mac ;-)
Dan Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 06:57:27     24.25.181.25
Roger - My computer is an HP and scanner/printer is a Lexmark X73. I also have no problems.
Roger Thursday, February 24, 2005 at 06:52:48     67.141.132.104
My computer is a HP, My scanner is a HP and my printer is a HP. I have never had any problems with any of them. I do need to add a memory stick sometime soon as it is getting old. Any suggestions??
Jake Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 21:15:56     24.61.129.90
Stew

Yes I remember telling him to contact you, glad you could help and the USCS as well


Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 21:12:44     12.72.119.90
Jake - I got at the Postal History Foundation said he knew you and that you recommended me to sell their naval covers. By the time he found me, another PHF volunteer, who is a USCS member, had already given me the covers to sell. I managed to get them $175.00 +/- with the USCS gettings it 20% commission. Thanks for thinking of me.
Jake Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 21:10:23     24.61.129.90
Hello LarryLa
Jake Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 21:09:09     24.61.129.90
Hi Stew
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 21:05:30     12.72.119.90
Good evening, gentlemen.
Dan Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 20:59:16     24.25.181.25
In Maine, every student in the 7th and 8th grades has a laptop and they are all Apples, several thousand of them.
SteveS Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 19:05:07     65.213.44.9
Larry, agreed. Sure there are programs for PC's only but I too use Office, internet browsers, Filemaker Pro (an excellent database by the way), Photoshop, Turbo Tax, a few other photo managing programs and that covers most of my needs. I primarily use Apple iPhoto for managing photos. I've seen some neat PC only games but I wouldn't have time to play if I had them. Macs used to be really limited but that was quite a long time ago now. If you really want PC stuff on a Mac, there are even PC emulator software packages you can add that would let you do that but I can't imagine needing that. No spy ware, ad ware and junk cluttering up my Mac. The Mac mini is a steal in my opion at $500. Add existing monitor, maybe buy a keyboard and mouse and you have a nice Mac at really low cost. And the footprint is incredibly small.
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 19:03:35     216.9.242.14
Great issue of mphs thanks to face Kent John young and Rich Hoffner
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 18:51:58     68.57.210.254
With 99% of my work being accomplished through Microsoft Office and the internet. I'm willing to give up the other 1% for the peace-of-mind a Mac offers. (potentially 1%, but not realistically since the odds of me needing a program that doesn't work on a Mac is very remote)
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 18:47:14     67.177.96.92
The key word there is "almost". I'll stick with the PC, it's more versatile.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 18:41:44     68.57.210.254
You can use most all software written for the PC on a Mac. The reason why viruses are so prevalent on PCs and not Mac's is that viruses are written to take advantage of the flaws in Windows code and not the OS code for Mac.
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 18:27:02     67.177.96.92
MACs are nice if you use a rather limited range of software.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 18:07:29     68.57.210.254
Microscoft is in such wide usage, that 99% of all viruses are written for the PC. My next computer will be a Mac!
SteveS Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 17:52:34     65.213.44.9
Larry, I have been a Mac user for years and love them. I use PC's at work and a Mac at home but I prefer the Mac. The relatively new iMac is great.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 17:47:09     12.72.119.19
Larry - Elmer Fudd does not live in BROOKLYN. With all those open fields and his trigger happy figure, I would think he would be a resident of a less urbanized rea.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 17:46:20     12.72.119.19
2 covers rec'd from MERCY as described by others.
john young Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 17:10:45     68.193.177.218
Dave Kent:Thanks for info on cancel & copy of
the MPHS Bulletin.



lbbrennan Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 15:37:15     38.117.188.10
An SH-60 Seahawk helicopter returns to the U.S. Navy hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19) with patients evacuated from Sumatra, Indonesia, on Feb. 21, 2005. USNS Mercy is currently operating off the coast of Sumatra providing assistance to International Relief Organizations and host nation medical teams working ashore in areas affected by the Dec. 26, 2004, Indian Ocean tsunami.
SteveS Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 14:55:34     65.213.44.9
Dave knows all this stuff about membership lists because he maintained the membership information for so many years. I'll bet he is still smiling from turning it over to me around 7 years ago now.
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 13:27:00     67.177.96.92
Thanks.
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 13:26:32     68.9.230.72
A USCS Membership Directory is available from Steve for $5.00. It's listed in the classified ads in the LOG. We don't list it for sale on the website because it's only sold to USCS members for their own personal use. We don't want commercial businesses getting one and sending junk mail to our members. By the way, if you don't want you address published tell Steve and he will mark you in the computer as "unlisted address."
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 13:19:59     68.9.230.72
i believe the Type 9-style Atlantic Patrol Force cancel of WW I was used at Gibraltar. It's been seen on covers from a number of ships.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 12:09:22     68.57.210.254
Ask SteveS: shaymur@flash.net
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 12:05:41     67.177.96.92
Wasn't there a list of members for sale at one time? I can't find it in the USCS store?
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 12:00:02     67.177.96.92
I'm on a cable modem too but I don't leave it on when I'm not actively online. Too risky, even with two firewalls.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 11:40:07     68.57.210.254
Greg - I'm on a cable modem, so the Chat page is always active, but I'm not always online. The only time it's down is when Windows XP acts up... I think my next computer is going to be a Mac!
john young Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 11:31:38     68.193.177.218
Dave Kent: What do you have on type 9 cancel
(Atlantic Patrol Force) dated 9 APR 1918.
The penned c/c reads J.F. Ferris, U.S. Naval
Forces, Europe & stamped SLK/ "Passed Censor"
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 10:54:37     67.177.96.92
Larry LaFoe: you're always here. Don't you have a life? [grin]
Roger Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 07:29:27     67.141.132.104
Hi Guys,
Got some covers back from USS OLYMPIA, USS CONNECTICUT, and USS SEAWOLF yesterday, all with C.O. Autographs and OSCs on the back of each.
Roger Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 07:23:05     67.141.132.104
Hi Guys,
Rececived covers back from USS MERCEY yesterday.
Some had T-9 cancels and some had 4 bar killers. All were dated 2/1/05, and had nice clean stikes.

Also rececived my USS JIMMY CARTER FDCs back from Groton with exceptionally nice stikes.

Larry LaFoe:
You are not alone, I too did not rececive any USS HAMPTON covers :-(


Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 23:54:02     68.57.210.254
Sounds like everyone received a USS HAMPTON Arctic cover but me :-(
john young Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 23:40:07     68.193.177.218
North Pole Cover: OSC/ Arctic Submarine Lab,
embossed seal USS HAMPTON (SSN 757) with penned
inscription that submarine was at "North Pole 190402Z APR 04" and signature. Cover was sent
to ASL (11/27/01) and m.c. in San Diego (2/17/05)

Jake Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 22:52:06     24.61.129.90
Hi Dick
Sorry I missed you again!!

Chas. Henry
I'll drop you an e-mail later with the e-bay stamp chat story.


Greg Jacobs Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 22:46:29     67.177.96.92
I didn't know Harold but I regret his passing.
Dick Z Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 22:32:58     207.69.137.38
Evening Jake
Jake Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 22:31:09     24.61.129.90
G'Evening Larry & Ed
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 22:22:26     68.57.210.254
Stew - Some of the Signed Submersible Dive covers I bought in the group of 40 had your name and Bwooklin address on them.
Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 22:08:38     12.72.121.72
Covers rec'd from JAMES E. WILLIAMS cancelled 11 Sept 04.
Covers ret'd from USNS 1st LT. H.L. MARTIN (T-AK-3015). My original mailing envelope was never opened ans it is stamped, "APO/FPO Closed" in red ink.

I am saddened to report the passing of USCS member Harold Chamberlain.


Thad Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 21:29:12     205.188.116.200
I too got my James E. Williams Sept 11, 2004 covers today along with my USS Hampton SSN 767 North Pole cover from the Artic Sub Lab.
Dan Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 21:24:25     24.25.181.25
I also received James Williams covers today cancelled Sept. 11. Was that possibly first day of postal service? Also got Jimmy Carter covers which were excellent.
Gregory A. Mews Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 21:10:55     65.26.213.150
Thanks for the compliment, yes you were the first to get the Carter covers. I did send some covers to Plains, Georgia by the way, birthplace of Carter, for Feb. 19th cancels. I might send some of those on to Groton to get those cancels as well.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 19:43:13     68.57.210.254
Greg - Was I the first person to buy your commissioning covers? Nice covers by the way!

Anyone else have any Carter Commissioning covers for sale?


Gregory A. Mews Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 18:38:17     65.26.213.150
I received covers back today from the James E. Williams DDG-95. Both the covers and the mailing envelope have Sept. 11, 2004 postmarks. The ship commissioned on December 11, 2004.
I also received covers back for the Carter commissioning from the Groton postoffice. Nice clean cancels. Great job!!!!
Covers also back from the Bonhomme Richard. Does anyone know if the ship is no longer involved with the Operation Unified Assistance program? The covers were postmarked Feb 9.
SteveS Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 17:07:37     65.213.44.9
My 2 cents on the Thrush cover, it is historical. I suspect that Jimmie Allen prepared the cachet and sent the cover to Marshall Hall, I am sure they would have known each other. Jimmie was a collector and cachet maker and also probably a member of the ANCS. If the question is should someone add a cachet to this cover, in my opinion, certainly not. This is an historical cover.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 17:00:34     68.57.210.254
Bruce - It's certainly significant for the five men and their families at minimum. Do I think someone should add a cachet to that cover - No... besides, where would you put it? It appears the text is contemporary to the cover (since it is inaccurate). Just my opinion.
Bruce Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 16:46:41     4.152.21.86
Rich - Thank you. Will pass it along. Bruce
Bruce Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 16:46:11     4.152.21.86
Larry -

Does this qualify as a "historical item"?
eBay 5560280288

Bruce


Ned Harris Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 15:59:56     63.184.1.238
I received a cover today from the USS HAMPTON North Pole visit. The hand annotation shows that they were at the North Pole on April 19, 2004. The cover is postmarked San Diego, CA on Feb 17, 2005 and has an Arctic Submarine Lab cachet.
Greg Jacobs Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 15:31:11     67.177.96.92
Less than 6 hours to go and JD still has no bidders on his packet of four covers.
Pacoastie@verizon.net Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 15:17:41     151.197.61.120
Larry LaF - I have see you are a seasoned cachet collector now. Your posting seems to say, you will collect what you want. That's the way it should be.
Pacoastie@verizon.net Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 15:11:11     151.197.61.120
Bruce - I just put ten cacheted envelopes (unserviced), Lot #5560091226 on e-Bay, I believe that a lot of them are done by Streeter.
Greg Jacobs Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 14:51:14     67.177.96.92
Larry Brennan: I believe Karcher did do a cover for the Ark but it was another fake, he backdated the cancel and put on a "free" frank.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 14:17:42     38.117.188.10
Dave, Many thanks. At that time we had more than 20 carriers and the accuracy of in coming space craft was questionable. Also, after Gus Grissom lost his capsule on the prior flight I assume that extra precautions were taken. I think Glenn was 75 nm from the prime recovery ship, and that would have taken a helo nearly an hour to cover outbound and much longer on the return trip.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 14:16:03     38.117.188.10
Did Ron Reeves or Fred Kartcher make the cancel for the launch of the Ark? That would be an impressive naval cover no matter what theological preference you have.
Greg Jacobs Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 13:45:40     67.177.96.92
Chas Henry: there is a photo of something in the ice but who's to say it's the ark? Serious biblical scholars are beginning to question whether Noah really existed or not. So don't come in here with your psuedo science and start telling me what to do.
Chas Henry Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 12:45:11     64.168.104.154
Jake - And so what happened to the e-Bay chat?
Chas Henry Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 12:40:13     64.168.104.154
Greg Jacobs - There's a photo of it in the ice flow atop Mt Ararat (in Turkey) - do some research.
Dave Kent Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 12:31:51     68.9.230.72
The Navy's history of ENTERPRISE says that she served as a support ship for John Glenn's flight. The cover sounds good to me, and a nice one. It was tough to hit the target in the early days of space, and the Navy had ships all over the ocean in case they missed.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 12:07:38     38.117.188.10
Another question re John Glenn recovery cover. I found an aerogram addressed to Germany [West German in those days] postmarked on board USS ENTERPRISE (CVAN-65) with her type 2 3PM 20 FEB62 and a red rubber stamp Mercury recovery cachet and a three line rubber stamp marking noting that COL Glenn had been recovered by USS NOA at 3:40 [details apporx since I'm doing this from memory the cover is not near me]. Comments please.
RDC Tuesday, February 22, 2005 at 04:36:49     205.188.116.200
Hello Larry LaFoe, I would be interested in the Arctic Exploration covers, if thats whats avail.
you can email me at: iTradeStampsU2@aol.com
Mike Monday, February 21, 2005 at 23:48:02     172.196.61.23
Hi, Does anyone know the FPO address for the USS JIMMY CARTER? Thanks.
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 21, 2005 at 23:04:40     68.57.210.254
I just bought a collection of 500 submarine covers. About half are Event covers and the other half are 100th Anniversary Submarine stamp covers. There are Crosby's, Gmahle's, early sub covers, Medal of Honor covers, Eternal Patrol covers, early postcards, signed U-boat covers, missile firings, some surface ships, Arctic Explorations, etc. There are quite a few that we already have in our collection and some that don't fit in our collection. If anyone has any interest, send me a note. I'll offer them here first before I list them on eBay.
Jake Monday, February 21, 2005 at 22:50:05     24.61.129.90
Larry L.
Thats good to hear, would hatre to think that this chat would end up like E-Bay's stamp chat
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 21, 2005 at 22:47:32     68.57.210.254
Nothing... it was a misunderstanding all around.
Jake Monday, February 21, 2005 at 22:46:01     24.61.129.90
Larry

What is this thing on "Censorship"??


Jake Monday, February 21, 2005 at 22:43:25     24.61.129.90
Hi Mike & Larry
Take a week away and looks like all kinds of things have taken place??
Mike Kaup Monday, February 21, 2005 at 22:33:09     4.178.54.140
Hi Larry!
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 21, 2005 at 22:07:19     67.177.96.92
Another stupid remark. Too many room temperature IQs here. I'm gone.
Mike Kaup Monday, February 21, 2005 at 21:59:38     4.178.54.140
Greg, There's talk about getting up a new expedition to Pelucidar next year. You interested?
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 21, 2005 at 21:29:14     67.177.96.92
Somebody watches too much Fox network. If the Ark had been found it would be on exhibit somewhere.
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 21, 2005 at 21:15:03     67.177.96.92
Nobody has found Noah's Ark. Another myth.
Stewart B. Milstein Monday, February 21, 2005 at 21:10:10     12.72.118.187
BBL
Stewart B. Milstein Monday, February 21, 2005 at 21:09:46     12.72.118.187
Interesting to read about what everyone else is saying.
Bruce Monday, February 21, 2005 at 19:16:36     4.152.21.159
Re: Cachet artist K. E. Streeter (fl. 1941-1943)

Hi all -

I am in contact with Jim Streeter of Groton CT, son of cachet artist K. E. Streeter. He's interested in learning more about his father's work, and has some of the original cachet art. Please drop me an email, and I'll pass your name to him.

Bruce
bdliddell@yahoo.com


prometheus Monday, February 21, 2005 at 17:58:42     4.247.140.143
Evening Gentlemen
I collect Sailors Mail (i think you know that )

Got this today.

Lonely sailor doing his duty, Foriegn Mission, Combat involved On land I know But they were there.
Image is at
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/ProsStamps/batch11-05013.jpg

"Please write been here for two months and have no idea how long we will stay on Account of the trouble down here." Hal Yarrington


Chas Henry Monday, February 21, 2005 at 17:00:49     64.168.104.154
Or how about the guy who climbed Mt. Arafat and discovered Noah's ark? All the skeptics were proven to be ignorant, hide-bound jerks!
Mike Kaup Monday, February 21, 2005 at 16:46:10     4.179.34.98
Greg, Want me to tell you about the time I climbed the Himalayas and rediscovered Shangri-La?
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 21, 2005 at 13:54:33     67.177.96.92
There are five people here but no posts in over 2 hours. Nobody got anything to say?
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 21, 2005 at 11:46:22     67.177.96.92
Bruce - my information was that the USS Washington was at sea on 12/7/41 but the person who told me could be wrong. I guess the only way to be sure would be to check the deck logs. As for it being a "legitimate" 12/7/41 cover... I defer to those with more experience who say there are none.
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 21, 2005 at 11:42:13     67.177.96.92
John Young, interesting information! Thanks.
john young Monday, February 21, 2005 at 10:23:01     68.193.177.218
Bruce: regarding USS PENNSY cover (12/7/41)
Checked USCS Yearbook (1940) and only two USCS
members were aboard the battleship:
Walter Mensch #1189 & CDR George C. Dyer
#1667. A check of ANCS rosters ('40 & '42) show none of their members aboard PENNSY. '42 roster
has Staff Sgt. Mensch (USMC) with 1st Defense Batt, Fleet Marine Force, San Francisco.
My belief, cover was done by aero-philatelist
because of usage of the airmail envelope, as an
souvenir of the attack. If more covers were made by someone (commerical), they would have used the printed matter rate (1 1/2 cents). Wonder how
many others are out there? Why make only one?
lbbrennan Monday, February 21, 2005 at 08:39:17     152.163.100.200
CSpan had the commissioning ceremony for USS JIMMY CARTER on over the weekend. It appeared to be held inside a large heated plastic tent. Interesting pitches to save EB, from its executives, naval officers and even President Carter, who recalled his days there during the building of K-1 [??]. Admiral Stansfield Turner give a presentation in the form of sea stories to the CO and officers and crew noting that his greatest achieivement was as PCO and CO of new construction. He wore an odd black shirt with a black and white tie. President Carter had his customary gray sweater -- Mr. Rogers revisited.

The senior serving officer present was VADM Munns. He is one of the three most brilliant naval officers I've met. Recently, he completed a long tour supervising the installation of Navy Marine Corps Intranet. I first met him on OPNAV staff where he was a post command Captain with two DSM's and a PUC or two. I gather the DSMs, which are unheard of for non-flag officers, are the type that the Selection Board sees noted only as "The President of the United States takes pleasure in awarding the Distinguished Service Medal to ... [citation classified Top Secret]."


Finally, from navy.mil:
Vice Adm. Munns presents the Seawolf-class nuclear-powered attack submarine USS Jimmy Carter's (SSN 23) commissioning pennant to former first lady Rosalynn Carter at the Commanding Officer's Reception to celebrate the Carter's commissioning on February 19, 2005. Jimmy Carter is the third and final submarine of the Seawolf-class. A unique feature of the Jimmy Carter is a 100-foot hull extension called the Multi-Mission Platform, which provides enhanced payload capabilities, enabling the submarine to accommodate the advanced technology required to develop and test a new generation of weapons, sensors and undersea vehicles.


lbbrennan Monday, February 21, 2005 at 08:30:31     152.163.100.200
Paul, Here's something from the Chicken Noodle Network's website on periscopes.

Up Periscope!


If you wanted to see over a short wall without being detected, what could you do? If you've seen spy movies or movies featuring submarines or army tanks, then you are probably aware of a tool called a periscope.

Periscope comes from two Greek words, "peri," meaning "around," and "scopus," meaning "to look." A periscope lets you look around walls, corners, or other obstacles without being seen. Submarines have periscopes so the sailors inside can see what's on the surface of the water, even if the ship itself is far below the surface. Periscopes can provide valuable visual data during battle and when determining the ship's position. Periscopes on newer submarines can take photographs with a 70-mm digital camera and then display those images on a television monitor. Some periscopes also have night vision, a still camera, and a video camera and can magnify images being viewed.

A simple periscope requires a vertical tube with mirrors placed at a 45-degree angle at the top and bottom of the tube. These devices basically collect light from an image and direct that light from one mirror at the top of the periscope to the mirror at the bottom of the periscope.

Despite its valued service for more than 80 years, the U.S. Navy will soon retire the conventional periscope, replacing it with non-penetrating imaging devices called "photonics masts." These are basically high-resolution cameras that capture and send visual images to flat panel displays in a submarine's control room.

Picture an antenna rising up from the submarine like it does from a car. Instead of using prisms and lenses, the new devices will use electronic imaging equipment. They will have three cameras— a color camera, a high-resolution black-and-white camera, and an infrared camera—to provide imaging for the submarine. One of the cameras will be highly sensitive and will be protected in a separate, pressure-proof and shock-hardened housing. There is also a range finder that uses lasers to find targets.

Though the military is saying goodbye to the original periscope, new periscopes have been developed that allow doctors to view inside the human body without having to resort to major surgery. What other uses do you see for the periscope?



lbbrennan Monday, February 21, 2005 at 08:27:13     152.163.100.200
Perhaps "peri-"scope isn't as imprecise a word as we thought for an airship. Here's a dictionary definition.


The prefix seems to fit and I don't think anyone questions "scope".
peri-


prefix

1. around, surrounding
pericarp


2. near
perilune
perinatal


[From Greek peri “around, about.” Ultimately from an Indo-European word which is also the ancestor of English far, per-, and paradise.]

In common usage a periscope is understood to rise above its surrounding, usually the sea, to give a view of the otherwise obstructed. The developing "periscope" technology will cause the hairs to raise on the back of our necks compared with what we've seen over the years. Most modern submarine museums have landbased periscopes for the enjoyment of children of all ages.


lbbrennan Monday, February 21, 2005 at 08:21:12     152.163.100.200
Paul Helman, the obverse of a periscope? the reverse of a periscope. Sounds like the order was "down scope" to deploy; "up scope" to retract. It's a primative technological predecessor of FLIR [forward looking infrared radar]. We had the first FLIR A6s with VA35 in the Indian Ocean 35 years ago. It was interesting to see what a TV camera and other gear could show not visible to the naked eye, particularly in the dark. Hiding in the clouds and peeking through with a "peri"scope what a stealthy idea for the "eyes of the fleet." Those guys deserved more than a single wing.
lbbrennan Monday, February 21, 2005 at 08:17:01     152.163.100.200
Dick Morain, Many thanks. How common a chapter notice posted on a ship in port on a Sunday. Mine has a socked on the nose block of four, I wouldn't be surprised if there were 25 of them since many socked on the nose cancels were on full sheets of low demonination definitives. I've heard of examples where the stamps were CTO [canceled to order] and not placed on covers until years after the event.

I have to recalculate the time differnce in 1941 between Pearl and the East coast. I remember that it was not not a smooth hour but x.5 hours difference. The Japanese had trouble with the tranlation of the embassy note to Secretary Hull, I thought they were supposed to deliver at 1300 local east coast time before the attack. I'll have to dig out Prange.

Interesting comments about add ons. The fundamental rule that all should find acceptable is the need to place the add on identifing information on the face of the cover to prevent intentional or unintentional misidentification. With the add on data elsewhere the posting on a website or elsewhere may not be a full disclosure. No one seems to disagree that the add on data needs to be disclosed. Placing it anywhere other than the face of the cover is aiding and abetting. Perhaps the year of the cachet should be placed on all cachets, add ons and not.


Larry LaFoe Monday, February 21, 2005 at 01:14:46     68.57.210.254
My definition of Historical Significance is: Tokyo Bay, Pearl Harbor, USS Pueblo, most pre-1931 covers (since that's about the time cachets were added), sunk Ships/Subs that didn't originally have cachets (around the period of sinking), scarce/rare/unknown ship's covers, etc.

You get the drift... a ship's history is routinely cacheted (a ship‘s anniversary, commissioning, decommissioning, launching, keel laying, Change of Command, Navy Day, July 4th, Christmas, are all fair game in my opinion). However, the date of a historical event, a rare cover, pre-cacheted covers, etc. are not fair game in my opinion. Very rarely, if ever have cachets ever appeared on a specific historical date (that is unplanned significant historical events - not talking about planned events like Apollo11, etc.) In the case of sunk ships/subs that have so few covers available, adding an add-on cachet takes something away from the cover, the value and the significance of the cover… in my opinion.

My response to your statement: “Is that "tampering with history"?” Anything we add to an existing cover is “tampering with history”. But it’s up to the individual that is doing the tampering to determine if they are responsibly adding to or detracting from that covers history.

As many of you know, when I began collecting naval covers a short time ago, I was adamantly against any type of add-on cachets. In a few short months, I’ve accepted the art of add-on cachets done responsibly. My point is… get examples in your hands - not just look at them on eBay, the internet, etc. Hold them in your hands, review the work, analyze the effect of a cover without a cachet and one with a responsibly added cachet… then make your decision. I’ve purchased many add-on cachets of late and none of them have turned me away from buying more covers with add-on cachets. Yes, I’m selective. I won’t buy a cover as in Bruce’s example - which is not his listing. ;-) I have yet to buy a cover with an add-on (to my knowledge) prior the 1970s and most likely will not. Bob Quintero, Roger Wentworth, Dave Kent and others have done a terrific job of showing me through their work and their words, that there is absolutely NO harm in adding a cachet to an existing cover when done responsibly by a responsible cachet maker.


Bruce Monday, February 21, 2005 at 00:46:21     4.152.21.127
"Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 17:00:32 Atlantis is a myth."

So was Homer's Troy, when my grandfather's grandfather was alive. (But I agree with you. The concept of "Atlantis" is so ambiguous that almost any drowned city could fit the bill, and Mare Nostrum has drowned cities on every coast.)

Bruce


Bruce Monday, February 21, 2005 at 00:41:37     4.152.21.127
Larry -

Not me! I didn't do it! I didn't post the add-on, I just spotted it on eBay and tossed it out for comments.

L>> "I will not intentionally buy a cover with an add-on cachet added to a cover of historical significance."

Can you define "historical significance"? I sold a USS CALIFORNIA BB-44 cover, postmarked on her 15th birthday, with an add-on cachet that advertised that anniversary. Is that "tampering with history"?

Bruce


Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 23:12:31     68.57.210.254
As I work through the whole add-on "controversy", I've established some standards as to what I will and what I will not buy.

I will buy a cover with an add-on cachet that has been added to a philatelic cover that had no previous cachet - and here's the controversial part - even if it's not properly marked. (Here's my theory. What’s the difference between a cover that had a cachet added contemporary to the cover, unidentified as to whom the cachet maker was, or one added a few years later by someone else? There's really no way to distinguish the two.) I’ve come to truly admire the beauty of a hand-drawn/colored/painted cachet added to a cover, as long as it is done well enough not to look out-of-place.

I will not intentional buy a cover, like the one posted by Bruce, that has an additional cachet added to a cover with an existing cachet.

I will not intentionally buy a cover with an add-on cachet added to a cover of historical significance.

I will not intentionally buy a cover with an add-on cachet added to a "Sailor's" letter.

These are all I can think of at the moment… I’m sure there’s some one-off’s I’m missing, but this is essentially the foundation to my buying criteria.


Bruce Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 23:12:25     4.152.21.42
More on the PENNSY 07-Dec-1941 cover.
Looks to me like Scott #UC6:
"Die 3: Vertical rudder leans forward. S closer to O than to T in POSTAGE. E of POSTAGE has short center bar." (Scott)
Bruce

Bruce Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:58:47     4.152.21.220
Gotta crow to somebody! Been a great week. Found two pre-1930 DDs, a NEREUS AC-10 T-P(3rz) and just won a Gow Ng SQUALUS SS-192 FDC. Big grin.
Bruce

Bruce Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:55:10     4.152.21.220
Larry -
Not to my taste, either, but what do I know?
Bruce

Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:53:05     68.57.210.254
I am pleased to see the seller offered full disclosure. My personal opinion is the cachet and add-on are so different, that it detracts from the cover as it was with the original cachet.
Bruce Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:49:04     4.152.21.220
Any opinions on this add-on photo cachet?
eBay item 5559893048

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=684&item=5559893048

Bruce


Bruce Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:43:10     4.152.21.220
Larry & Paul -

I've seen a legitimate cover from USS WASHINGTON BB-56 postmarked 07-Dec-1941. I think she was at the Wash DC Navy Yard for post-shakedown work, and the ship's crew was working that Sunday.

Bruce


Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:31:16     68.57.210.254
Received in December of '42, probably postmarked in December of '42.
Paul Helman Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:29:44     68.165.4.184
gotta go, talk to you all tomorrow.
paul

Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:28:51     68.57.210.254
I never earned any overtime while in the military.
Paul Helman Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:28:38     68.165.4.184
Larry, Possibly, but its a mystery. The cover is canceled with a 3z dated 12/7/41. In pencil on the back is USS Arkansas. This was a common way to mark covers sent during WWII. We presume that marking is correct. The cover has a cachet for the 50th anniversary of the State of Idaho which would have been 3 July 1940. Stamp is a Prexie. Very curious about this cover is also on the back in ink is "received 12/12/24". Was it 42 and not 41? This is why we collect this stuff, keeps us busy.

Stewart B. Milstein Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:24:24     12.72.119.148
Larry - if a post office were open ona Sunday in ME, and that is a very big if, why would the government be paying overtime rates for a postal clerk. The mail could have been deposited on Sunday, but probably not cancelled on a Sunday.
Stewart B. Milstein Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:23:24     12.72.119.148
Larry - the nickel posting on ebay brought out a lot of overpriced stuff. I wonder what percent actually sold?
Stewart B. Milstein Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 22:22:08     12.72.119.148
Good evening, gentlemen.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 21:49:15     68.57.210.254
Paul - If Pearl Harbor were attacked at approximately 8:00 a.m. then it would have been 1:00 p.m. on the East Coast... ample time for a postal clerk to have postmarked that day's mail (not even taking into consideration the time necessary to transmit data in 1941). So the only variable is that December 7, 1941, was on a Sunday. I suspect if a local post office was open in Maine, there's no reason to think the postal clerk didn't tender mail to them.
Paul Helman Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 21:28:48     68.165.4.184
Re Arkansas on 12/7/41, DANFS says
The outbreak of war with the Japanese attack upon the Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor found Arkansas at anchor in Casco Bay, Maine. One week later, on 14 December, she sailed to Hvalfjordur, Iceland. Returning to Boston, via Argentia, on 24 Janua ry 1942, Arkansas spent the month of February carrying out exercises in Casco Bay in preparation for her role as an escort for troop and cargo transports. On 6 March, she arrived at Norfolk to begin overhaul. Underway on 2 July, Arkansas conducted shakedown in Chesapeake Bay, then proceeded to New York City, where she arrived on 27 July.
Paul Helman Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 21:25:50     68.165.4.184
Been off the chat for a day and half. Lots of interesting material. Thanks for the continuing thread on the Macon "periscope". Funk and Wagnalls says a periscope is "An instrument consisting of prisms or mirrors so arranged as o reflect light down a verticle tube..". Clearly a missuse of the term.

With all the comment on the Pensy 12/7/41 I looked through all my BB and found an Arkansas dated 12/7/41. I need to check the stamp. Way to go John Young on providing a good tool to determine authenticity.


Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 17:00:32     67.177.96.92
Atlantis is a myth.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 16:04:50     68.57.210.254
We need another nickel or free listing day on eBay. It really brought out a LOT of covers!
Mike Kaup Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 15:57:01     4.179.33.218
Larry LaFoe, I made it to Atlantis back in the 60's but THAT'S another story!
Chas Henry Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 13:44:56     64.168.104.154
Larry LaFoe - There are plenty of signs that Atlantis is lying beneath the Atlantic, but that's a whole 'nother ball of wax, as they say.
Chas Henry Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 13:43:23     64.168.104.154
Greg J - In other words, you're not going to say how much you might offer on a ST LOUIS cover dated 12/7/41. Why not?
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 12:33:07     68.57.210.254
Greg - Try this link:

http://defencetalk.com/pictures/displayimage.php?album=search&cat=0&pos=1


Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 12:13:09     67.177.96.92
I couldn't get a response from that link Hank sent. I think you might have to be a reqistered user of the site.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 12:06:31     68.57.210.254
It's funny, when I misspelled poses to posses, it took on a whole new meaning!
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 12:04:47     68.57.210.254
Do we even know if Atlantis is real? I thought the mountain was charted, but just not on the chart the CO had aboard the SAN FRANCISCO? The article seems to be written to solicit a fearful response and posses some strange conjecture.
Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 11:53:07     67.177.96.92
Another from Hank Baxter: This link http://www.defencetalk.com/pictures/albums/userpics/hres-b.jpg shows the nose damage to that sub. If you look at the skin just forward of where the turnbuckle, with sheared wire rope length, is secured you'll see how devastating the impact was. It actually buckled the hull. Probably the only thing saving them was it appears to have taken a slighlty to port off-center hit on the stem, which had a slight glancing effect. Amazing!

Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 11:51:57     67.177.96.92
Got this from Hank Baxter just now: Guys! Give this a read (the article below) as there is much here to muddy the waters and/or possibly account for the unexpected seamount. In the Admiral's Mast it was asserted that 1) He (Cdr. Mooney) had access to charts showing there might have been an obstruction in the area". and 2) Soundings taken minutes before the incident occurred did NOT correlate with the charts and should have raised his suspicions. These assertions, taken at face value, can be quite damning, BUT absolutely need more specific comment. Hopefully JAG will review the Mast report and issue a statement to clarify this.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Sub accident shows earth's crust changing fast without notice to the monitoring systems - sudden Tsunamis without warning possible?

Srini Balasubramanium, India Daily, 13 Jan 05

The U.S. Navy submarine accident that killed one sailor and injured 24 others occurred when the vessel -- traveling at high speed -- hit an undersea mountain head-on, Pentagon officials said recently. The mountain was uncharted while the submarine was in the area that was

supposed to be charted. There is absolutely no evidence that the submarine was attacked or collided with another naval vessel. This story has a major untouched issue that needs to be addressed by USGS and other similar bodies under UN and other nations. While there is no reason to believe the above 9.0 Richter earthquake has anything to do with the new unknown mountain, in many parts of the world, the sources are reporting extreme changes in the earth's crust and severe tectonic movement. The submarine was traveling in excess of 33 knots -- about 35 mph -when its nose hit the undersea formation head-on, officials said. This again points to unknown tectonic activities that are unnoticed by our monitoring services. Common assumption is that tectonic plates move and earth's crust changes through earthquakes and sudden stress relief. According to

some Geological experts that may not be true always. There are cases where earth's crust has reshaped itself in a relatively silent way. In addition, according to a large number of oceanographers, our earthquake and Tsunami monitoring systems in the ocean are not capable of

monitoring many of the underwater deformations and changes. If really an under water mountain came up in recent days without any notice to the present civilization then this can be serious trouble in the coming days. First, the commercial and military vessels, ships as well as submarines are vulnerable in sailing in uncharted water. But even more dangerous, there may be some mega tectonic changes coming and we are slipping under a catastrophic time bomb. If you look at history, there were similar signs before Atlantis was struck with massive tectonic devastation. There were underwater and on the surface deformation and movements that finally built up the quick devastating catastrophe. Some Geologists are saying that the tectonic movements all over the world are all related. Some even bring in the theory that atmospheric extremes are always accompanied with major tectonic changes.


Dick Morain Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 11:22:51     64.48.76.101
Larry Brennan,
I, too, have a Dec 7, 41 item from the St. Augustine. It is a card, typed addressed, to Mrs. Almira F. Hillman. The reverse of the card is printed and announces the December 14th meeting of the Old Ironsides Chapter. The meeting was to be held at the home of Charles Schell, 48 Ash Street, Braintree.
Cheers, Dick
Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 11:22:03     67.177.96.92
Larry Brennan: The USS Washington was in the Atlantic on 12/7/41 and I've seen a cover up on eBay. Speculation was the same as with your cover - struck post 12/7.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 10:58:29     68.57.210.254
Looking for USS California (1990-1992) and USS Yosemite (1982-1985) Rogak cachets.
lbbrennan Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 10:53:11     205.188.116.200
Stewart, It's bitter cold in NJ today. The skies are clear and blue but there must be some gray overcast. Thank God it spring training. Warthm and hope springs eternal.
lbbrennan Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 10:51:20     205.188.116.200
I have a USS St. Augustine PG cover cancelled 07dec41. She was in the Atlantic, probably in port in Boston on that date. The cover is unaddressed and uncacheted with a type 9 [registered] cancel socked on the nose of a block of four half cent orange Ben Franklin stamps. My guess is that it was struck by or as a favor for one of the Old Ironsides members, perhaps one who worked for the Post Office. Has anyone else seen such a cover. Comments invited.
lbbrennan Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 07:34:42     205.188.116.200
For those who are interested in locating original naval records, etc. here is a cut from a posting on the USS ENTErPRISE (CV-6)'s website. I have no personal experience with these folks.

Deck logs and similar materials are available through PIKE Military Research, at http://www.militaryunits.com/ :
PIKE Military Research
1539 Foxhall Road NW
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 338-4249


Roger Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 07:29:24     69.40.18.134
Hi Guys:
The APS Show in Atlanta was a nice experience. Got to see Capt. Rawlin's exhibit on the history of naval cachets...it was far more spectacular up close. And of course he won yet another award for it!! Capt. Rawlins was there.
Spent a lot of time at Paul Huber's table. Managed to pick up two T. Roosevelt cachets from him that I did not have, and picked up a few naval covers for some friends who could not attend as well. Also found a gob of uncacheted naval covers in the $1 box at The Cover Connection's table.
I did not buy a T-shirt though! LOL!!
Roger Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 05:31:33     69.40.18.134
Quote:
"We are always the same age inside"
Gertrude Stein
lbbrennan Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 02:59:20     205.188.116.200
With all the electronic snooping gear she probably should have been a SSN(Q) like the electronic warfare squadrons or named after President Nixon. Nixon, Ford and Johnson served in the USNR in the Pacific on active duty in WWII, to varying degrees, with Ford serving on a CVL in extensive combat, Johnson getting a Silver Star from MacArthur for a "combat" flight", and Nixon working in some logical bases behind the front lines. No USN ships have been named after them yet. Probably never will happen.
lbbrennan Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 02:55:30     205.188.116.200
The crew assigned to the USS Jimmy Carter (SSN 23) bring her to life as they board the newly commissioned Seawolf-class nuclear-powered attack submarine. Jimmy Carter is the third and final submarine of the Seawolf-class. A unique feature of the Jimmy Carter is a 100-foot hull extension called the Multi-Mission Platform, which provides enhanced payload capabilities, enabling the submarine to accommodate the advanced technology required to develop and test a new generation of weapons, sensors and undersea vehicles.
lbbrennan Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 02:53:50     205.188.116.200
Dan, The wages in European shipyards, at least in the West are not so bad, particularly in Scandanvian and Italy. In Asia I think it varies. Korea is the leader but Japanese wages are not low. Japan still is a leading shipbuilding nation. Many suspect that government subsidies allow the shipyards to prosper. No realistic hope of commercial business in the US coupled with the drastic decline in USN shipbuilding bodes well for the US yards. Politics are the key. Things in the NE US are not likely to get a lot of $ in this administration. There really is no Navy presence between Portsmouth and New London and between New London and Earle NJ [just a few MSC ships remain] and then south to Annapolis/DC and then Norfolk when it is empty nearly to Jacksonville. The East Coast has large gaps between USN bases, particularly those with ships and aircraft.
lbbrennan Sunday, February 20, 2005 at 02:49:07     205.188.116.200
Good day to do some reseach about covers for LOG articles. Now the hard part is turing the data into a story.

Robert, good sunday morning to you.


sTEWART b. mILSTEIN Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 22:22:32     12.72.121.33
The crawl on the TV tells me that we are going to have a lot of rain tonight and for most of the week. The dry washes are not so dry anymore.

The scary thing about a flashfood in the desert is the nose. You would think you could hear rusging water, but it is the sound of gravel, rocks and debris accompanied by the roar of the water that is so different.


Greg Jacobs Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 21:39:32     67.177.96.92
I don't feel any different either, not in my head, but the body lets me know I'm not 35 anymore.
Ed 10975 Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 18:40:31     12.76.173.158
Stewart - You are absolutely correct that you are only as old as you feel. I'm 6 weeks younger than Greg Jacobs which means I'm 62 and I don't feel any different than I did 25 years ago.

Wikipedia - The name comes from the Hawaiian word wiki which means very fast or quick.
(Heard it on an ad)


Greg Jacobs Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 17:56:33     67.177.96.92
Chas: Stew's cover, even fake, interested me because it's a treaty cruiser. I have no interest in JD's Pennsylvania cover. I might if I collected know fakes.
Dan Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 17:05:39     24.25.181.25
Charles Henry - What I meant was that news stories about fires at the shipyard isn't helping the people who are trying to keep the yard open. There is a very good chance that PNS will be on the hit list this time. The place is over 200 years old and some of the work that Portsmouth could have done, and wanted to do, was shipped out to private yards. I think the whole deal is political because if they really wanted to save money, repair work would be done in Europe and Asia where the wages are are horrible by our standards. (sorry about the shouting).
Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 16:47:54     68.57.210.254
jdtent - Let us know what you find out.
jdtent Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 16:44:32     69.160.5.51
guys-I keep checking this site because now I am very interested when I put it on I did not think it was a big deal.I will checkout what John came up with.
Chas Henry Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 16:41:28     64.168.104.154
Dan - No need to shout! But what did you mean by "Not good PR to keep PNS off the closure list"?
Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 16:37:14     68.57.210.254
jdtent - John Young came up with a good idea. The airmail envelope the PENNSYLVANNIA December 7, 1941 postmark is on, is either an UC 3 (1934), UC 4 (1942), UC 5 (1944) or UC 6 (1942). All the envelopes are the same with a slight variation in the height of the "6". If the postmark is on a UC 4, UC 5 or UC 6, then you'll have 100% proof that this was not postmarked on 12/7/41. You can go to your local library and research the 4 envelopes. Look for Scott Standard Postage Stamp Catalog, Vol. 1.
Chas Henry Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 16:35:27     64.168.104.154
Larry LaF - Oh, you're a laff riot!
Chas Henry Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 16:34:24     64.168.104.154
Greg J - You asked Stew if he wanted to sell his, he said it wasn't for sale, and you replied "drat" - also you advised jdtent to offer one for $10 rather than 200, so I just assumed you must have some estimate in mind of their worth.
Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 16:32:34     68.57.210.254
I'm glad someone found something I've posted here funny!
Chas Henry Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 16:30:05     64.168.104.154
Larry LaF - Very funny. Why would I want to collect 400 of the same cover - then turn right around and sell them?
Gregory A. Mews Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 15:58:37     65.26.213.150
Today I received another treasure-load of covers from the USS Lincoln, thanks to PC3 Brian Pena Pena. This was from three different mailings, all back today: Jan. 24th cancels--backside signed "Humanitarian Relief, Sumatera, Indonsesia;
Feb. 5 "In Port Singapore, after Humanitrian Relief, Sumatera, Indonesia; and covers postmarked on Abraham Lincolns Birthday of Feb 12th....he signed the covers "homecoming."
He also wrote a letter, I had written him before asking if he was onboard when President Bush visited the ship for its homecoming after Iraqi Freedom. PC3 Pena writes as follows:
I hope it is a little bit warmer when you receive this letter. We are doing good and sailing smooth. Yes, I was onboard when the president came aboard, and you probably seen me at the end of the tape where that big bunch of people was trying to shake his hand. The past 26 Jan. has been 3 years of me aboard. So I think it is great that we are helping witht he Tsumami victims instead of being in the war. I think I did these covers a little bit different than usual, so I hope that you like them. If not you know all you have to do is say the word and you know that I will be more than glad to assist you with it. Until next time, God Bless and take care,
Very respectfully, PC3 Brian Pena Pena"
So if there is something specific you need on a cover from the Lincoln, let Pena know and I'm sure he'll do his best.
Greg Jacobs Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 15:33:34     67.177.96.92
Wow. Ninety minutes and no posts.
Greg Jacobs Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 13:05:52     67.177.96.92
SteveS, I'd search the Staples and Officmax web sites for labels.
lbbrennan Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 12:20:03     216.9.242.14
Quiet cold day in nj
lbbrennan Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 12:17:55     216.9.242.14
Long time ago I used them must use rag envelopes Washington press was a good source some were reusable
SteveS Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 10:09:23     4.246.6.43
Hey guys, I have a member asking me for advice on a peelable address label. Do any of you use them and can you recommend a manufacturer and label number?
lbbrennan Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 10:08:12     216.9.242.14
Busy and goph chat overnight
Greg Jacobs Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 10:05:59     67.177.96.92
I see that there is still no apology from Drew for his tirade. Oh, well......
Greg Jacobs Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 10:04:22     67.177.96.92
Chas: I would offer NOTHING for the backdated Pennsylvania cover. Where'd you get the idea that I would?
Mark Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 09:34:09     66.58.131.250
Maybe the owner of the cover will provide the measurements of the cover to this list. Be interesting to find when the cover was manufactured.
john young Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 09:29:05     68.193.177.218
Regarding PENNSYLVANIA cover:
The unaddressed arimail envelope (7 cents)is
listed in Scott's UC 3 (1934), but there are three
other types with different measurements in the
numeral "6" - UC 4 (1942), UC 5 (1944), UC 6 (1942). Wonder which one was used on the cover &
one wonders why this is the first one to come on
the market. What collection did it come from?

Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 08:41:33     68.57.210.254
Chas - If you want a truly impressive collection... buy all 400 of those Colorano covers @ $28 each. $11,200 later, you'll have a very impressive collection! You can even control the Colorano market for that cover... just like the Hunt brothers controlled the silver market. If you sold the covers for $30 each... you would be $800 richer!!!!! :-0
Mike Kaup Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 04:06:19     4.179.54.143
Larry LaFoe, You would be quite OK in the basket. Helium is inert. It's the chance of a faulty altimeter that would worry me.
Chas Henry Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 01:55:14     64.168.104.154
Wphew! How'd I miss all that in one 8-hour period? Let's see - still unresolved is how much Greg would OFFER for the back-dated Pearl item? I would imagine that would fall somewhere between 10 and 200 dollars? (I just paid $28 for a scarce Colorano cover - only 400 were made - the highest I've yet gone for one. But also, it's a rail cover - apparently much harder to accumulate.)
e sink Friday, February 18, 2005 at 23:32:02     68.85.255.77
Hi Stewart and all...
SteveS: thanks for the reply about Tony Wawrukeiwicz as the contact for the free franking info. / Elgin
Mark Friday, February 18, 2005 at 23:15:41     66.58.131.250
We even have an Office Max...
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 23:14:53     68.57.210.254
Don't you have an Office Depot or Kinko's in Anchorage... I'm sure they make rubber stamps. ;-)
Mark Friday, February 18, 2005 at 23:13:24     66.58.131.250
That's "In the Basket"
Mark Friday, February 18, 2005 at 23:12:27     66.58.131.250
Would be an intersting view from the basket. Now if we could find a cover that was marked as being serviced "in the back" we would have a rare Macon cover.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 23:10:37     68.57.210.254
Mark... if I was in the "spy basket" and had access to a phone. My first call would be... "GET ME OUT OF HERE!" ;-)
Mark Friday, February 18, 2005 at 23:07:13     66.58.131.250
Telescoping Car...

Found at http://history.acusd.edu/gen/USPics/moffett/60th.html


The ship also came equipped with another scouting oddity known as a "spy" car. A cable would lower the telephone boothlike compartment from the airship to a point below cloud cover up to 1,000 feet. A crewman inside the spy car would then telephone back to the main control room relaying navigational information. The car acted as a sort of reverse telescope. The Macon and the Akron were built to be the chief scouts of the Pacific Fleet, providing long-range reconnaissance. In addition to providing protection for the "aircraft of the sky," the Sparrowhawks and the "spy" car were the ships' main eyes.


Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 23:05:37     68.57.210.254
I finally found reference to the periscope... it was called their "spy basket". Let me see... riding in a basket, attached to a flying helium bomb. Where do I sign up?
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:58:39     68.57.210.254
It's interesting that it was a 3,000 foot periscope, since that was her maximum rated pressure height.
Paul Helman Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:58:00     68.165.4.184
The article in the 26 October 34 Vallejo Time Herald uses the term Periscope, which is what caught me eye. At the bottom of the column it says "The U.S.S Macon is now equiped with a sub-cloud observation car or "periscope" which may be suspended on a small wire cable as much as 3000 feet below the ship"

It is possible that the plan was to hide in the clouds and drop the observaton car to look around. Very interesting use of the term "Periscope"


Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:48:19     68.57.210.254
I did a search for USS Macon and periscope... nothing! Was it truly a periscope? I wonder if it was so they could use cloud cover?
Paul Helman Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:42:09     68.165.4.184
Evening Larry,

Was doing a little more Navy Day research today at the huge microfilm cache at the official California State Library. Nice use of our tax dollars. The Macon made an appearance for Navy Day 1934. She flew over a Keel Laying and dropped flowers. Mellone's lising of Macon covers lists over 90 for the day in the SF Bay area. An interesting trivia item I found in the Vallejo paper for 26 October 34 is a warning to small airplanes to NOT fly under the Macon. Stated reason was she was going to use for the first time a 3000 (that's right 3000) foot periscope suspended under the airship. Evidently this was some type of hanging basket. That would be a fun ride. Anybody know anything about this?


Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:14:55     67.177.96.92
Larry - you're not bad for someone from wilds beyond the Hudson River. I have to run. Take care.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:12:18     67.177.96.92
Where'd everyone go?

Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:11:42     67.177.96.92
[blush] guilty. I have a couple of more.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:10:59     68.57.210.254
Okay... quit bragging! You're just copying your favorites now!
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:10:53     67.177.96.92
Hmmm. I'll have to try it.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:10:24     67.177.96.92
Moree good sites: http://www.asiaticfleet.com/

http://www.ibiblio.org/phha/Battleship_Row.html

http://www.ibiblio.org/phha/


Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:08:49     67.177.96.92
http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq82-1.htm - this site lists all ship casualties during WWII.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:08:36     68.57.210.254
What I like best on the Wilipedia site is they have a search engine... so you can search for the obscure, whereas DANFS only has the noun name of the ship.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:07:22     67.177.96.92
Another good site is www.hazegray.org
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:07:16     68.57.210.254
Yep, she was aflame on December 7th!
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:07:04     12.72.119.109
Good evening, gentlemen,
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:06:58     67.177.96.92
www.history.navy.mil/danfs/
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:06:34     67.177.96.92
DANFS is a little better in my opinion.
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:06:28     12.72.119.109
GENERAL BELGRANO was ex-BROOKLYN Class cruiser USS PHOENIX. I believe PHOENIX was also a Pearl Harbor ship.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:05:58     67.177.96.92
Good conversations tonight!! And I was wrong about the Belgrano! Always a first time.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:04:54     68.57.210.254
This is by far the best, quickest, most accesible site I've found to research ship histories:

http://en.wikipedia.org


Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:04:51     67.177.96.92
Larry LaFoe - you are right.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:03:53     68.57.210.254
More correctly, the ARA GENERAL BELGRANO
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:03:08     67.177.96.92
Stewart - one web site I checked says the St. Louis was transferred to Brazil. If you check photos of both ships you'll see that they are not the same ship.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:02:22     68.57.210.254
The BELGRANO began life as the USS PHOENIX.
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:00:42     12.72.119.109
Greg - I'd be able to answer you in amoment were I in Bklyn with all my reference books. Right now, I am going by memory. I'll do some research and be back in a bit.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 22:00:33     68.57.210.254
It'd have to be a newer St. Louis if it was sunk during the Falklands?
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:59:45     67.177.96.92
Larry: you're right. I hope he stays in.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:58:59     67.177.96.92
Stewart: are you sure? I thought the Belgrano was one of the Baltimore class heavy cruisers?
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:58:06     12.72.119.109
Age is almost irrelevant - you are as old as you mentally believe you are. Since I got a second chance at life following spinal fusion surggery, I tend to think of myself as still pre-adolescent.
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:56:48     12.72.119.109
ST LOUIS survived the war and was evetually sold to Argentina. She was the BELGRANO when the British torpedoed her during the Falklands conflict.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:55:30     68.57.210.254
Hey... it's a new member, young enough to carry the USCS torch for decades to come!
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:55:16     67.177.96.92
Well - you were born......
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:54:50     67.177.96.92
Thanks for that tidbit Larry. [grin] I was the youngest member of the Nathan Hale chapter until one of the women signed her grandson up!
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:54:09     68.57.210.254
When my son started collecting Nuclear Subs... I was hoping to find something of importance that occured the day I was born... nothing!
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:53:25     67.177.96.92
The problem with thos damn treaty cruisers was a lack of armor. Those Japanese "Long Lance" torpedoes just wreaked havoc.
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:53:07     12.72.119.109
There a lot of guys looking for postmarks on the day that they were born. I have oen with the WW II Slogan "Back the Attack." It would imply that I was meant to be cannon fodder.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:52:30     68.57.210.254
You're the same age as my mother!
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:52:04     67.177.96.92
Yep: 12/1/42. Torpedoed the night before at Tassafaronga.
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:50:38     12.72.119.109
Hi Elgin.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:50:18     68.57.210.254
jdtent - Take Care!
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:50:06     68.57.210.254
Greg - That's an interesting reason to collect a ship... sunk on the day you were born.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:49:47     24.50.113.166
No matter what happens I had fun guys,THANKYOU
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:46:01     67.177.96.92
Darn!
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:45:09     12.72.119.109
Greg - Not for sale.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:44:53     68.57.210.254
jdtent - I'm guessing you paid close to what you have them listed for on eBay. If someone mislead you, you can certainly use our opinions to potentially get your money back.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:44:16     67.177.96.92
Stewart - the St. Louis was a treaty cruiser. Want to sell your fake?
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:43:20     67.177.96.92
jd - join up and get the monthly log. you might enjoy collecting. you've got a start. I collect "Treaty Cruisers" in general and the USS Northampton in particular because it was sunk on the day I was born.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:40:15     68.57.210.254
jdtent - I know it's not the answer you were looking for or hoping to hear, but I would take Dave's opinion and list it as a philatelic item and not an authentic December 7, 1941 postmark.
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:40:07     12.72.119.109
Good evening, gentlemen. I have been readingand am glad to see we are back on naval/philatelic topics.

I have a Crosby cover from the USS ST. LOUIS cancelled Dec 7, 1941. There is no dounbt in my mind that it is backdated if not an outright fraud. I keep it to remind my of the phrases, "Buyer Beware," and, Barnum's "A sucker is born every minute."


jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:39:08     24.50.113.166
guys I am only 31 years old and a correction officer in New York State what do I know.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:38:56     68.57.210.254
jdtent - According to our very, very knowledgable expert, Dave Kent. Absolutely no genuine covers from any ship are postmarked on December 7, 1941. You can take that as gospel or you can continue to rely on a source, that I would probably bet any amount, is less knowledgable then Dave (with the exception of the postal clerk assigned aboard the USS PENNSYLVANIA on December 7, 1941).
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:38:03     67.177.96.92
Jd - no problem. Just don't even hint about something like that.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:35:31     24.50.113.166
Greg-Sorry
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:34:14     68.57.210.254
Yes they are... but 2 are 1st anniversary covers commemorating the attack on Pearl Harbor and the other is an event cover. All are philatelic items.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:34:12     67.177.96.92
jdtent - if you write on it then the word "foregery" comes to mind.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:33:23     67.177.96.92
jdtent - you obviously don't want to give up on the idea that you have a very valuable item but it's just not so. Many people more knowledgable than you or I have studied the matter. And it doesn't matter what Mystic thought about his stamp collection. That's an entirely different subject.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:32:48     24.50.113.166
Larry-Bet ten bucks they do
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:31:53     24.50.113.166
True should write on in

Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:31:00     67.177.96.92
jdtent - Postal Clerks did not work on Sunday.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:30:41     24.50.113.166
Larry-and the other three covers are great!!!
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:29:21     68.57.210.254
In theory, that's true. But it would still be hard to explain why a postal clerk would cancel an envelope with no addressee or return address unless it was a commemorative backstamp philatelic item.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:26:33     24.50.113.166
I can answer your quetion,GOOD the NAVY does not shut down and no one knew they were going to get bombed
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:24:49     68.57.210.254
jdtent - You welcome! Come back anytime you have any questions.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:23:16     24.50.113.166
Well thanks for the help and it is a great piece and I really appreciate the invite. But just wondering if it is or was real what would the value be
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:22:32     68.57.210.254
jdtent - Think about it this way... if your town was bombed before 8:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning, what is the probabilty you'd go to your local post office with an envelope with no addressee or return address and your postmaster would cancel your envelope? That's the same chance that the PENNSYLVANIA envelope you have listed on eBay is real.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:17:08     68.57.210.254
jdtent - It is probably a period piece, but the chance it was postmarked on 12/7/41 is zero. It more probably was dated months or years later aboard the PENNSYLVANIA... but not in 1941.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:14:15     24.50.113.166
I really do not want tocheat anyone but the thing looks real to me.It also might help to say the same guy I go these from also had a large stamp collection and Mystic came to the house to buy it including new#1 and used#2.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:13:41     67.177.96.92
This has been very interesting but I'm off to do some reading. Later.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:08:11     67.177.96.92
If you have no bids you can pull the auction or modify the price. I would take Larry's advice and put a notation on it.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:07:10     24.50.113.166
If anyone takes it I do offer money back.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:07:07     68.57.210.254
jdtent - Honest answer, none.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:06:02     24.50.113.166
But what the slim chance it is real.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:04:13     67.177.96.92
In the art world there is a lively rraffic in know fakes that are sold as such. Some people collect them. I don't know if that is true with covers. Larry's advice is good.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:03:11     68.57.210.254
My recommendation is too add a comment on the listing stating that it is a philatelic novelty that was postmarked after 12/7/41 and not on 12/7/41.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:02:12     67.177.96.92
I would drop the price to $10 and see what happens. You'll never get $200.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 21:00:58     67.177.96.92
Having money means little. I know a number of people with much money and little knowledge. I doubt you'll get a bid and if someone buys it and finds out it's not authentic it could be a problem.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:59:00     24.50.113.166
It was with the three other covers and the guy had money,Thats what makes me think it is real.Should I pull it from E Bay.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:58:12     67.177.96.92
I'd accept Dave's answer.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:57:44     67.177.96.92
Larry - I'm sure there are some authentic 12/7/41 cancels but I've never seen one. There was one from the battleship USS Washington on eBay a while ago but the consensus was that it was backdated by the PC since she was in the Atlantic at the time.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:57:04     68.57.210.254
Dave Kent states that there are no known genuine covers dated aboard any Pearl Harbor ship on December 7, 1941.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:55:40     67.177.96.92
Larry - email on the way.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:54:21     68.57.210.254
jdtent - Were there any other naval covers included in this group, or were there just the four you have listed on eBay?
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:50:58     68.57.210.254
jdtent - The postmark holds all the value for that cover. The envelope has very, very little value. If the postmark were real, it would be very valuable, but there are too many red flags that persuade us to think it's a philatelic novelty.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:49:42     67.177.96.92
No, but my experience is limited since I've only been collecting for 18 months. Dave Kent is the person to ask. I'll send you his email address.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:48:53     68.57.210.254
Greg - Do you know of any authentic Pearl Harbor 12/7/41 covers?
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:48:45     24.50.113.166
I can not explain the postmark its just on the envelope, if it helps the stamp is a raised US Air Mail. Sorry to hear about the Lasalle but it needed it.

Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:48:28     67.177.96.92
Good!
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:47:47     68.57.210.254
I just sent him an e-mail to hit reload.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:46:49     67.177.96.92
jdtent - why don't you join the USCS? We'd be glad to have you. I'm glad you accepted my invitation to visit.

Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:45:04     68.57.210.254
Our thoughts are the cover may have been postmarked onboard the PENNSYLVANIA, but at a later date... backstamped as a philatelic cover and not actually postmarked or used on December 7, 1941.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:42:04     68.57.210.254
I forgot to mention on a Sunday too.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:40:08     68.57.210.254
jdtent - Our concern is that it would have had to have been postmarked before 7:55 a.m. Our other concern is there is no addressee or return address on the cover.
Richard D. Jones 3933 Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:38:42     67.35.139.97
JDTENT
LaSalle is on her way back to CONUS for decommissioning in the next few months.
jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:25:36     24.50.113.166
By the way I was a BT3 aboard the U.S.S Lasalle for 4 years.

jdtent Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:23:24     24.50.113.166
Alright guys I am the seller of the cover and I just found it. I am not a savy computer user and I am definitly not trying to screw anyone as far as I know it,the cover is real
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 20:14:47     67.177.96.92
Larry Brennan: you're welcome. I got that from Hank Baxter.
Dan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 19:49:21     24.25.181.25
OF COURSE I DO NOT WANT PNS CLOSED!
Roger Friday, February 18, 2005 at 18:33:28     69.40.18.134
Hi Guys:
Received my USS HARTFORD and USS AUGUSTA anniversary pictorials today from Groton. Excellent strikes!!
Aso received some multicolored stickers from the Arctic Submarine Laboratory (in California) from a Submariner friend of mine who is stationed near Point Loma. He was formaly a crew memember on the USS SALT LAKE CITY.
Chas Henry Friday, February 18, 2005 at 18:30:44     64.168.104.154
Dave - Just listened to the APS audio show, excellent discussion. You didn't quite mention that civilian mail has sometimes gone via military trans during labor strife...it's like death and taxes - there's no stopping it!!!
Chas Henry Friday, February 18, 2005 at 18:25:40     64.168.104.154
Re SF wreck: The captain gets punished because the obstruction was photographed but never applied to the charts?? Sounds like someone else is being protected. . .
Chas Henry Friday, February 18, 2005 at 18:19:24     64.168.104.154
Dan - You want them to close your Naval Shipyard??
Dan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 18:08:47     24.25.181.25
Not good PR to keep PNS off the closure list.
Dan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 18:06:08     24.25.181.25
Friday, February 18, 2005
Two sent to hospital after sub catches fire
By Douglas P. Guarino
Democrat Staff Writer
dguarino@fosters.com

PORTSMOUTH — Two U.S. Navy sailors were transported to Portsmouth Regional Hospital on Thursday night after a fire on board the USS Jacksonville at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard.

It was the second fire in about two months on board the nuclear submarine, which is currently undergoing an Engineered Refueling Overhaul at Dry Dock 2.

At about 6:55 p.m. Thursday, the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Fire Department responded to what Public Affairs Officer Debbie White described as a “small fire” in a statement released Friday morning.

The fire was located in a forward compartment of the ship, White said.

“It was immediately extinguished and the situation is under control,” White said in the release. “All non-essential personnel were temporarily evacuated from the Ship.”

Two shipyard employees and six sailors were treated at the scene of the fire for minor smoke inhalation, according to the statement. Six of the patients were released and returned to work status.

The two sailors who were transported to the hospital for evaluation have since been released.

White described the damage to the submarine as “minor charring of hull insulation in a small area.” An investigation into the cause of the fire is in progress, she said.

Another fire that occurred on board the Jacksonville in December had also been described as “small” according to a statement the public affairs office released Dec. 21.

In the December fire, the bottom two rungs of an aluminum ladder, several temporary services hoses and a light were damaged, according to the release. Those repairs, estimated to cost less than $10,000 were not expected to have an impact on the submarine’s overhaul schedule, officials said.


Richard D. Jones 3933 Friday, February 18, 2005 at 17:31:34     67.35.139.97
The National Science Foundation research vessel Maurice Ewing, which grounded on a coral reef off the Yucatan peninsula on Monday, now faces charges brought by PROFEPA, Mexico's Environmental Protection Agency.

Since last month, the ship has been conducting seismic research off Yucatan said to be aimed at researching the 120 mile diameter Chicxulb Crater, centered off the port of Progreso, about 190 miles west of Cancun. The crater may have been caused by an asteroid impact, theorized to have led to the extinction of the dinosaurs.
PROFEPA says the vessel's hull has been injurious to coral and has damaged about 10 square meters of coral.

The extent of financial penalties sought will be established over the next several days--and the ship could be temporarily placed under arrest to ensure payment.


Richard D. Jones 3933 Friday, February 18, 2005 at 17:27:20     67.35.139.97
Received Jimmy Carter SSN-23 Commissioning covers from Groton, CT today. Nice clear stikes.
lbbrennan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 16:05:56     38.117.188.10
Greg, Thanks for the updated posting re SAN FRANCISCO.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 15:16:14     67.177.96.92
Hi Bruce. got anything interesting up on eBay?
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 15:15:32     67.177.96.92
Mooney Supporters Race To His Defense
Relief Of Skipper Of Grounded Sub Stirs Controversy In Navy Circles

By ROBERT A. HAMILTON
Day Staff Writer, Navy/Defense/Electric Boat
Published on 2/15/2005

The father of the submariner who died when the USS San Francisco hit a seamount last month said he disapproves of a Navy decision to punish the captain, Cmdr. Kevin Mooney, for the accident.

“How could I in my right mind hold him responsible? No one has showed me yet that he did anything wrong,” said Daniel Ashley, the parent of Machinist Mate 2nd Class Joseph Ashley. “I'm just having a difficult time justifying in my mind that he is to blame here.”

Ashley said he is upset that satellite images of the area taken in 1999 show the seamount, but that information was never incorporated into Navy charts. He said the Pentagon needs a process to get the most updated information into Navy charts.

“The crew jumped through all the hoops, they took all the soundings, they did everything they should have done,” Ashley said. “The captain tried to apologize when we went out to Guam last month and I told him he had nothing to apologize for.”

That same sentiment has been expressed by many in the submarine community, and is spreading quickly on computer bulletin boards and e-mails.

“There are hundreds of submariners who would go to bat for him, all he has to do is say the word,” said Ron “Warshot” Smith of Austin, Texas, a World War II submariner who is a close friend of Mooney.

The San Francisco was enroute to Australia Jan. 10, traveling near its top speed at a depth of 500 feet, when it slammed into a sea mount, in an area where Navy charts list 6,000 feet of water. MM2 Ashley was killed and 98 others were injured, 23 so badly they could not perform their duties.

Mooney was reassigned to shore duty Jan. 20, and on Friday the commander of the U.S. Seventh Fleet found him guilty of putting the ship in a dangerous situation. He was relieved of command and given a punitive letter of reprimand, essentially ending his career.

“Everybody is in disbelief, but nobody is really blasting the Navy directly,” said Ron Martini, a former submariner who runs a popular submarine bulletin board on the Internet from his home in Sheridan, Wyo. “I'd say 100 percent of the posts are supportive of the crew, and 80 percent, at least, are showing at least some degree of dismay about what happened to Commander Mooney.”

Tom Grudier of Montville was a sonarman on the USS Sturgeon when it ran into St. Croix in 1973. The captain of that ship was relieved of command as well, but that accident followed a string of problems and most of the crew thought it was warranted, he said.

“Based on what I've read, the San Francisco situation seemed a little muddled,” Grudier said. “I'm not shocked there are people upset that he was relieved — in fact, I'm not happy about it myself.”

John Carcioppolo, a retired master chief radioman and commander of the Groton base of U.S. Submarine Veterans, knows crewmen on the San Francisco, including a man on the navigation team, “and they are still behind him 100 percent.”

“I don't know all the circumstances of this case, but I would have thought (Mooney) would be right on the money,” Carcioppolo said. “But I also know that there has to be accountability, and unfortunately it's usually the captain.”

“Most of the reaction on the board is that he's a scapegoat for the higher-ups,” said James L. Christley of Lisbon, a retired senior chief electrician's mate. “That's rarely the truth, but I don't know enough about what went on to cause him to hit the mountain to have a position.”

Terry Jones, a retired Navy captain and former submarine skipper, dismissed speculation that Mooney might have been punished unfairly.

“There would be no reason to make an example of the commanding officer, so I have to believe his superior in command has enough facts to be doing the right thing,” Jones said.


SteveS Friday, February 18, 2005 at 14:55:13     65.213.44.9
Elgin, Tony Wawrukeiwicz covers Free Franking in the US Postal Rates reference work. I'm sure it lists dates.
lbbrennan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 13:47:30     38.117.188.10
The guided missile frigate USS McInerney (FFG 8) passes under the rail bridge in Rendsburg, Germany, on Feb. 15, 2005. McInerney visited Rendsburg during the frigate's transit from Poland to Malaga, Spain in support of the NATO Response Force (NRF). The role of the NRF is to provide an integrated and fully interoperable sea, land, and air capability under one command, wherever the North Atlantic Council requires, to prevent conflict or threat.
lbbrennan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 13:34:45     38.117.188.10
Herb, I must have been looking around or working. Will stay in touch.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 12:57:37     67.177.96.92
That was Roger fooling around.
Chas Henry Friday, February 18, 2005 at 12:55:41     64.168.104.154
By the way, what is "Loose Cannon" 69.40.18.134 all about?
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 12:53:46     67.177.96.92
Chas: I don't want to control the world. Just North America. [g]
Chas Henry Friday, February 18, 2005 at 12:49:59     64.168.104.154
Larry and Greg - No offense (I only said it "seems" that way). Besides, it depends on how we define "IT types". I suppose it's just human nature to reach a certain level and want to control the world...
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 12:30:14     68.57.210.254
Herb - Have you received payment for the last two groups of covers you've sent me?
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 12:19:28     68.57.210.254
Herb - I am now.
e sink Friday, February 18, 2005 at 11:59:47     68.85.255.77
Does anybody have a listing or know of an article
on the times since World War II that military FREE franking privileges were in effect? I am interested in the names of the wars or actions including geographic areas included, and the time
gaps when there was no FREE franking privilege for any service. What would be an address where I could get such info? Thanks / Elgin Sink USCS 5633
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 11:56:27     67.177.96.92
I emailed the person with the Pennsylvania cover and got much the same answer as Rgoer:
"I do not know anything about stamps or covers.A wealthy relative died and left it." I gave him a link to this web site.


herb rommel Friday, February 18, 2005 at 11:46:44     68.109.122.54
Larry, are you on board now?
lbbrennan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 11:18:17     38.117.188.10
The Military Sealift Command (MSC) underway replenishment oiler USNS John Ericsson (T-AO 194), center, conducts a dual replenishment at sea between the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63) and the guided missile cruiser USS Cowpens (CG 63). Currently under way in the 7th Fleet area of responsibility, Kitty Hawk demonstrates power projection and sea control as the U.S. Navy's only forward-deployed aircraft carrier, operating from Yokosuka, Japan.
Roger Friday, February 18, 2005 at 10:36:10     69.40.18.134
I emailed the seller of the USS PENNSY. 12/7/41 cover. He told me that he knows nothing about covers and that the cover was in a collection of a recently deceased relative.
lbbrennan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 09:49:02     38.117.188.10
The Pennsylvania 7DEC41 cover looks like one I saw years ago in Larry Briend's collection. He doubted its authenticity and I think that is the majority view. Is it the ship's cancel at that time? Possibly but I would have to see a better copy than what is posted. The OKLAHOMA's type 9 was recovered and was on display at the postal museum. I think it's been struck since and had the date 6 DEC41.
Loose Cannon #2 Friday, February 18, 2005 at 09:38:42     69.40.18.134
To Loose Cannon #1:
"Loose Cannons" have valid opinions just like anyone else who uses this Chat Room. Don't let the behind the scenes email comments of others discourage you from your opinions. LOL!!!!
Loose Cannon #2

Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 09:18:24     68.57.210.254
Based on the text below... stating that all hands were aboard, it is feasible (but not probable) that the postal clerk could have postmarked a cover on 12/7/41. However, the cover in question is not addressed and has no return address... it appears to have been made as a novelty.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 18, 2005 at 08:50:36     68.57.210.254
At 0755 on the morning of December 7, 1941, the USS PENNSYLVANIA was sitting in dry-dock in the Pearl Harbor Navy Yard. Her screws had been removed from their shafts and were resting on the bottom of the dock. She had been scheduled to leave the dock on the sixth and berth at Ten Ten Dock, immediately adjacent, but delays had been encountered, those delays probably saved the ship. It was a normal quite Sunday morning and there was little activity aboard. The watch had just been set and the Chaplain was making preparations for the eight o'clock mass on the quarterdeck. Virtually all of the Ships Company were aboard. In view of the existing conditions general over-night liberty had not been granted. Suddenly and with complete surprise, Japanese dive bombers and torpedo bombers roared out of the high overcast. The PENNSYLVANIA was one of the first ships in the harbor to open fire. Her 50 caliber machine gun crews had their guns in action even before General Quarters was sounded.
SteveS Friday, February 18, 2005 at 08:48:25     65.213.44.9
That has to be a backdated Pennsy cover. It's got bogus written all over it.
lbbrennan Friday, February 18, 2005 at 08:44:16     216.9.242.14
Postmarking covers on a Sunday before colors in port in haiwaii not likely
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 18, 2005 at 08:36:42     67.177.96.92
Roger is probably right. Might have been backdated by a savvy PC a few days later when he realized what a 12/7/41 postmark might be worth.
Roger Friday, February 18, 2005 at 07:31:23     69.40.18.134
Concerning the USS PENNSY 12/07/41 cover. LET THE BIDDERS BEWARE!!! My gut tells me the cover is a bogus backdated cover.
Bruce Friday, February 18, 2005 at 01:38:31     4.152.21.208
More on PENNSY. Has anyone contacted the seller to ask for provenance? Personally I'm VERY leery of first-time sellers with high-value items.
Bruce Friday, February 18, 2005 at 01:35:33     4.152.21.208
Re: PENNSYLVANIA cover.
My USS SHAW 07-Dec-1941 postmark was probably made with a stolen postmark device, likely written off as destroyed in the attack.

Re: Censorship.
I'm confused about the censorship issue. What it the subject, or the words? George Carlin's "Seven Little Words" are not appropriate, but what's wrong with boobs? I'm quite attached to them myself, whenever I can.

Bruce


Bruce Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 23:46:42     4.152.21.116
Have y'all seen this eBay item? USS PENNSYLVANIA postmark 07-Dec-1941.
5559239236
Unaddressed, gotta be a backdated souvenir. Any opinions?

Bruce


Paul Helman Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 23:32:31     68.165.4.184
Stewart,
thanks for putting some aside. Larry LaFoe tells me he is going to have a table at some future shows. He may want a few for the same purpose.
Paul Helman Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 23:31:11     68.165.4.184
Stewart,
No news on 4449 yet. Still need to check with the higher folks here at the museum to see if they know anything. Will let you know when I find anything out.
Paul
Stewart B. Milstein Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 23:30:52     12.72.120.180
Got more circuits to get out.

Paul - I put aside a few stacks of OREGON covers for any groups soliciting in Linn's. Nothing in the current issue but I will keep looking.


Paul Helman Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 23:29:07     68.165.4.184
Greetings all,
Been spending some time down at the microfilm library that the State of California has reading Vallejo newspapers to get a fix on what Navy Day at Mare Island was like in the 1920 and 1930s. No news about ships doing cancels but lots of information about the actual activities on the Navy Base. My plan is to summarize this in a LOG article or two.

Some early pieces of trivia. The newspapers consistently refer to submarines as "Divers". Took me awhile to figure out what was meant. Each Navy Day had a huge boxing tournaments of ship's champ against base champ. One big thing in the mid 1920 was to eat at the Base Cafeteria. Its wonderful to note the tremendous response from the community during these Base Open houses. Mare Island had over 3000 visitors for the 1926 Navy Day. My favorite activity I have read about so far is an activity that occured in 1933

USS Bass will demonstrate " What a submarine does when it dives while high and dry in Dry Dock #1. Movement of diving fins, rudder and other gear used in gliding beneath the surface of the sea.

That would have been a kick to see.

Paul


Stewart B. Milstein Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 23:19:15     12.72.120.180
Good evening, Paul. Any luck with 4449? It has been too gray here to photograph though I did catch an LTEX unit which is allegedly Larry's Electirc and Truck Service. Ever hear of them?
Stewart B. Milstein Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 23:14:08     12.72.120.180
Good evening, gentlemen.
Richard D. Jones 3933 Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 22:27:29     67.35.138.143
Joe Lewis
MArias and Mississinewa were Norfolk-based AOs Marias is scrapped 144 is in James River Fleet
The other 2 are west coast ships in Suisun Bay Reserve Fleet, Benecia
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 22:23:10     67.177.96.92
According to her war history the Pennsylvania was in drydock on 12/7/41. I wonder how many of her crew would have been aboard?
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 22:21:05     67.177.96.92
I would be very leery of the 12/7/41 cancel for the USS Pennsylvania. As Dave Kent has pointed out postal clerks did not normally work on Sunday. And on 12/7/41 would have probably been serving A/A guns or swimming for dear life! I'm not sure when or how bad the Pennsylvania was hit but I doubt her PC would have been handling mail that Sunday.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 21:40:34     68.57.210.254
Does this appear to be genuine:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=684&item=5559239236&rd=1


Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 21:13:42     68.57.210.254
Mike K... isn't that what it all comes down to! ;-)
Mike Kaup Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 21:10:06     4.179.38.46
They can do anything they want as long as they don't throw me into the briar patch!
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 19:07:10     67.177.96.92
Herb Rommel: having the IT guy delete posts he doesn't approve of is not "much ado about nothing".
lbbrennan Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 18:50:52     216.9.242.14
Joe probably Transferred at their homeports
herb rommel Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 18:46:25     68.109.122.54
Just signed on and read recent messages. I do not understand all the stuff about censorship.Seems much ado about nothing
joe lewis Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 16:51:41     12.65.144.140
I'm interested in finding the locations at which the following oilers were transferred to MSC. Any help will be greatly appreciated!
MARIAS (AO-57), 2 OCT 73
MISSISSINEWA (AO-144), 15 NOV 76
HASSAYAMPA (AO-145), 17 NOV 78
PONCHATOULA (AO-148), 5 SEP 80

Thanks in advance!


lbbrennan Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 16:28:51     216.9.242.14
Lots of legal arguments
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 14:50:59     192.249.47.11
Larry LaFoe: wow. I knew there was something about you! [grin]
Dan Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 14:25:20     24.25.181.25
I refuse to get into this "censorship" discussion but I want to point out that, if you have a problem with any participant, you should email that person and not use a public chat room for the dirty laundry.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 13:50:51     68.57.210.254
I hate to admit it too... but I've was an IT type from 1981 - 2001.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 13:49:43     192.249.47.11
Chas Henry: Don't generalize like that. I'm one of those IT types and I hate censorship.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 13:19:57     68.57.210.254
John & Don - Received your covers today. Thanks!
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 13:14:39     68.57.210.254
Dave - Received the info regarding the Submersible dive covers in the mail today... Thanks!
Chas Henry Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 13:03:04     64.168.104.154
It seems to be the nature of IT types to just high-handedly start censoring anything they don't approve of. There wasn't even any controversy til this "Drew" character stepped in.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 12:05:23     192.249.47.11
Roger: Nice post.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 11:32:24     68.57.210.254
Roger - Thanks for not perpetuating what Drew began. It was never a battle between me and you, but is an argument for what belongs to us... USCS.org!
Roger Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 11:29:19     69.40.18.134
Larry Lafoe:
Thank you for the cut and paste comment that I made back in January. I had forgoten about that! But, I stand frimly by my previous posting to Drew and Karl. I posted that January comment in haste, and I am being totally honest with you, that I regret(ed) having posted it!! I am responsible for the posting though. If it got deleted, I am fine with that, and fully stand behind Drew's decision to do so. I made an inappropreate remark and if it did offend anyone, I do humbly apolgize. I am no longer involved in this issue and will refrain from further comment.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 10:45:16     68.57.210.254
Dave Kent - GREAT Radio Show! For those that would like a great history lesson of US Naval Postal History (and benefit from Dave's tremendous knowledge) go to:

http://www.wsradio.com/apsstamptalk/

If you want a TiVo effect, the USCS portion begins at 3:07 and ends at 18:43


Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 10:23:35     67.177.96.92
Larry: See you later. I really have to run now.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 10:23:02     67.177.96.92
Dave Kent: Do I have to be a member of USCS to stay in the Nathan Hale group?
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 10:22:23     68.57.210.254
The other sad side effect of this is... through Drew's actions, he has instigated a reaction from Roger that wouldn't have occurred if the original post had remained.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 10:11:28     67.177.96.92
Karl Zurn: If posts keep getting deleted I will be resigning from the USCS. Censorship has no place here.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 10:02:12     67.177.96.92
Later. Got to go and work my long two hour day.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 09:25:40     68.57.210.254
Just to give everyone an idea of was posted (since our original posts were removed)... we were talking about adam's apples!
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 09:14:55     68.57.210.254
C'mon Roger... this is a cut-an-paste from one of your own posts:

"Roger Friday, January 28, 2005 at 15:27:22 69.40.16.191
Larry LaFoe:
I don't have a mermaid fetish. I actually have a boob fetish! LOL!!!"

This is a cut-and-paste of your post today:

"I enjoy a good spirited discussion, but I will not participate in those that are sexual in nature, or that are chauvinistic or demeaning toward women."

You're overreacting to Drew's postings (Is Drew a member of the USCS?). We both know the content of your e-mails to me and the content of our phone conversations.

Who owns USCS.org? If the USCS does, which I assume it does, then my dues pay for this site too... and as such, we ALL should be able to post to this site. If MED Associates does, then it shouldn't be called U.S.C.S. Chat it should be called MED Associates Chat. If there are any guidelines that the Board (not those that one individual determines unilaterally) has developed relative to this Chat page... post them. I assume threatening the President, yelling fire and swearing in front of a judge isn't the list... or even relevant!


Roger Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 07:36:14     69.40.18.134
Drew:
I totally agree with your position! and I applaud you editorial actions!! Especially if the deleted comments were in any way slanderous/defaming or could be interpreted that way. Folks have been asked to leave this chat room for such character asasinations in the past, and for their use of scurrilous language. Some topics are just out of bounds!!
Roger Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 07:22:32     69.40.18.134
Karl Zurn:
I agree with you!!
I did not see the posts that were deleted, nor do I know what their actual content was. I also did not participate in them. But, if they were sexual in content( and I have been told they were) or too bawdy, they should have been deleted. Such discussions should be conducted through private email and should not be fodder for our chat room. If I had seen that the comments were of a sexual nature, I would not have participated in them in this chat room, out of respect for women or youngsters who may visit our site.

Larry Lafoe:
Don't assume that just because some of my cachets have naked mermaids in the artwork that I am open to discussions of a sexual nature, or that I have a bawdy side to me. I draw naked mermaids because the nature of mermaids is to wear no clothes....please don't read anything else into my character from my artwork. I enjoy a good spirited discussion, but I will not participate in those that are sexual in nature, or that are chauvinistic or demeaning toward women.


drew Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 07:22:19     64.222.114.66
Hello all,
I am a strong supporter of free speech. However, there are reasonable limits to freedom of speech. Here are some examples and explanations.
1 - You cannot threaten the president (or anyone else for that matter).
2 - Cannot shout fire in a crowded theater.
3 - Start swearing in front of a judge and you will probably be thrown in jail for contempt of court.

Now some things that can be said in private can not be said in public. Here's a ficitional example - say "She's a whore" to a friend in private - Your friend may agree or disagree, but no big deal. Now say "She's a whore" on the front page of the newspaper, and slander, libel, and defamation of character lawsuits will almost certainly follow. This is a public log, and as such there are greater limits about what can be said than in private. Obviously the USCS, MED Associates, Karl Zurn, and I would like to avoid any potential lawsuits or liabilities.

Now the comment in question could have been interpreted in several different ways. I interpreted the comment to be offensive. Since the comment was not relative to the USCS, and was clearly a topic of no redeeming value I decided the best course of action was to remove the comment altogether. This society is a community, and to a certain degree we have to be respectful of the community members. Unfortunately in a situation like this not everyone will agree with the decision, though I believe it was a correct decision with regards to the community as a whole.


Karl Zurn Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 01:21:18     64.222.126.28
Hi All,
I just noticed it appears Drew deleted some comments on the chat room. I don’t know the exact contents of the comments but I will check with him tomorrow. We definitely should act at once to remove comments that would create a liability to the USCS but we also have to protect the first amendment rights of the members. Some us older salts are not always sensitivities of the younger folks.

Mike Kaup Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 00:46:15     4.178.54.30
Even better, the almost non-existant USS "Backfin" KL cover is ALSO up for grabs. A red letter day indeed.
Mike Kaup Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 00:32:55     4.178.54.30
OK, so who will end up with the "RARE" USS "Larder" KL cover RKA is auctioning?
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 22:07:19     67.177.96.92
Censorship! Welcome to Gulag USCS. (g)
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 21:37:38     68.57.210.254
We were having some fun... not sure if Drew made a unilateral decision or was prompted to remove our posts. Regardless, they were removed and we've lost our freedom of speech on this site (but as Drew says I can "say whatever (I'd) like on (my) own web site." :-)
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 21:34:24     67.177.96.92
Larry LaFoe: What was all that with Drew? I know that you, Roger, and I had some lively discussions but I never considered your posts offensive.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 21:13:53     68.57.210.254
Nevermind... I'm listening to you now.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 21:13:13     68.57.210.254
Dave - Thanks! I only caught the last 20 minutes. Do you know when the USCS talk began?
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 21:10:37     68.9.230.72
This afternoon's webcast on wsradio has now been archived on the wsradio website. Go to
www.wsradio.com/apsstamptalk
to hear it.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:53:32     68.57.210.254
Regretfully you removed our comments so no one can make their own decision... you've made it for them. It was nothing more than healthy banter between me, Larry and Roger.
phil schreiber Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:51:37     4.250.54.24
February cover of the month: USS PRINCETON CVL-23IS NOT ACCURATELY MEMORIALIZED. IT WAS NOT SUNK AUGUST 1944 AT LUZON. IT WAS SUNK OCTOBER 24 1944 DURING BATTLE FOR LEYTE GULF ALONG WITH CVE'S USS SAINT LO AND USS GAMBIER BAY.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:41:57     68.57.210.254
I sent my concerns to the Board Members and the Directors as well as Roger and Larry. If you have an arbitrary "censoring" policy, please provide it to MEMBERS of the USCS.
drew Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:37:56     64.222.114.66
Larry, I have no complaints about your last five posts :)
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:34:00     68.57.210.254
Drew - I trust you won't "modify or delete" my last three posts?
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:33:18     68.57.210.254
I thought I was a member of an organization that bred camaraderie... not censorship!!!!!
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:32:19     68.57.210.254
Drew... Say it on the Chat page:

Hi Larry,
I feel your posts about mermaids was more inappropriate for the uscs chat room
than anything else. Certainly you have freedom of speech, and we are very open
in the chat room as to what we allow. Feel free to say whatever you like on
your own web site. I do feel that questioning someones sexuality is not an
appropriate topic for the uscs chat room however. Even if you meant no harm
with the comment, and did not mean for the comment to be interpreted that way,
the comment may have been easily misinterpreted.


Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:15:26     68.57.210.254
Drew - I just noticed that some of my and lbbrennan posts are missing... I assume you don't think our posts were "abusive or demeaning"? If so, I think I'll move to North Korea where they have more freedom of speech.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:05:30     68.57.210.254
Drew - We've lost more postings.
drew Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 20:04:34     64.222.114.66
If anyone has any complaints about the contents of the chat room please email webmaster@uscs.org Please note that abusive or demeaning posts can and will be modified or deleted.
e sink Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 19:56:40     68.85.255.77
Roger:
I thought the COMFORT was in the tsunami areas and I got covers back with type 9's and over- postmarked Baltimore.
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 19:35:48     152.163.100.200
Drew, Thanks for the continuing improvements. The log in procedure is smoother.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 18:14:21     68.57.210.254
Drew - Looks good! Thanks!
drew Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 18:14:03     64.222.114.66
We have upgraded to a better webserver, so hopefully there will be no more problems with the site. If there is, email webmaster@uscs.org
drew Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 18:12:46     64.222.114.66
Let me know if any info is missing - I think the chat is correct now.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 18:02:44     68.57.210.254
Drew - Thanks!
drew Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 17:58:42     64.222.114.66
Hi All,
I will try and put the chat back together. The info has not been lost yet. We switched to the new server before I realized it.
Roger Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 17:56:07     69.40.18.134
Does anyone know if the USS COMFORT is still in the Gulf War area?
Norman Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 17:52:21     64.53.52.226
Dave, Thanks for the information. I am also a member of MPHS. I will review the 2004 bulletins to learn if they have something. Norman
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 16:53:44     68.57.210.254
There was a lot of useful information during the period we lost!
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 16:23:24     38.117.188.10
A young Indonesian girl in respiratory distress and her father arrive aboard the Military Sealift Command (MSC) hospital ship USNS Mercy (T-AH 19) for treatment by Navy medical personnel and non-governmental organization "Project HOPE" volunteers. Mercy is serving as an enabling platform to assist humanitarian operations ashore in ways that host nations and international relief organization find useful. Mercy is currently off the waters of Indonesia in support of Operation Unified Assistance, the humanitarian relief effort to aid the victims of the tsunami that struck Southeast Asia.
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 16:16:23     38.117.188.10
Guys we just lost most of a week. Old news is still ...
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 16:11:03     67.177.96.92
Wow! A lot of messages did disappear.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 15:58:38     68.57.210.254
It appears it'll be two weeks before we can listen to today's show again?
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 14:38:01     68.9.230.72
Let's try again:
www.wsradio.com/apsstamptalk
to hear an hour-long webcast on military mail. Three different USCS members willbe guests on the program. The program will be archived a short time after it's broadcast live so you can year it any time you want by clicking the appropriate button.
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 14:36:19     68.9.230.72
If you're not doing this afternoon (this being Wednesday Feb. 16) at 3:00 p.m. (noon Pacific) set your web browser to

Dave Kent Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 14:35:34     68.9.230.72
Ah, yes, it's the old "reset to Sunday" deal. I've often wished I could rerun a day myself.
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 12:28:22     68.9.230.72
JIMMY CARTER is 453 feet long! It's a wonder they can dock her at the Submarine Base without blocking the Thames River. I believe she will be based at Bangor, Washington, where the boomers are.
Dan Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 11:43:28     24.25.181.25
Dave Kent - Received the covers. Thanks.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 10:38:05     68.57.210.254
Does anyone know the average number of cachets Rogak did per event?
john young Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:48:30     68.193.177.218
lbbrennan: You want to borrow my copies? I'll
bring them to next chapter meeting
john young Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:47:30     68.193.177.218
lbbrennan: You want to borrow my covers?
john young Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:46:15     68.193.177.218
NAVY DAY, 1944
Trying to identify type z cancel, dated 27 OCT 1944. The cancel has U.S. (top) & NAVY (bottom)
with ten straight-line killer bars. The cover is
unfranked (no stamp) The printed cachet(blue) has
battleship with four stars on each side with
wording FLOTILLA 28 above & SOMEWHERE/ WITH THE
NAVY below. The cover is unaddressed.
Flotilla 28, Group 19 (LCI {L}) were deployed
in Southern France (Oren), but don't beleive, as
the cover appears to be a hand-back!
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:42:59     68.57.210.254
Larry - You can buy both years from Paul Helman for $20 per year. Great investment!
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:40:32     38.117.188.10
Larry send them to the Carter Presidential library and you may have a better chance.

John, do you know where I can get access to the LOGS for 1962-63.


Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:31:15     68.57.210.254
Do you think they'll go back to SSN-780 now instead of SSN-24?
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:30:24     68.57.210.254
Wonder if James will sign the commissioning covers I sent to his yacht?
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:17:37     38.117.188.10
The Navy will commission its newest nuclear-powered attack submarine Jimmy Carter Feb. 19, during an 11 a.m. EST ceremony at Naval Submarine Base New London, Groton, Conn.

The attack submarine Jimmy Carter honors the 39th president of the United States.

President Carter is the only U.S. president to have qualified in submarines. He has distinguished himself by a lifetime of public service, and has long ties to the Navy and the submarine force. Carter graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1946, served as a commissioned officer aboard submarines, and served as commander-in-chief from 1977 to 1981. Carter's statesmanship, philanthropy and sense of humanity earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002.

Retired Adm. Stansfield Turner, a classmate of the president who served in the Carter administration as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, will deliver the ceremony's principal address. Rosalynn Carter is the sponsor for the ship named for her husband, with daughter Amy serving as matron of honor. In a time-honored Navy tradition, Rosalynn Carter will give the first order to "man our ship and bring her to life!"

Jimmy Carter is the third and final submarine of the Seawolf class. As the most advanced submarine in the class, Jimmy Carter will have built-in flexibility and an array of new warfighting features that will enable it to prevail in any scenario, against any threat - from beneath Artic ice to shallow water. Differentiating Jimmy Carter from all other undersea vessels is its multimission platform (MMP), which includes a 100-foot hull extension to enhance payload capability. The MMP will enable Jimmy Carter to accommodate the advanced technology required to develop and test a new generation of weapons, sensors and undersea vehicles for naval special warfare, tactical surveillance and mine-warfare operations.

Capt. Robert D. Kelso, a native of Fayetteville, Tenn., will serve as Jimmy Carter’s first commanding officer, leading a crew of approximately 130 officers and sailors. Built by General Dynamics Electric Boat in Groton, Conn., the 12,130-ton Jimmy Carter is 453 feet in length, has a beam of 40 feet, and can operate at speeds exceeding 25 knots when submerged.


lbbrennan Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 09:15:45     38.117.188.10
Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Central Command, U.S. Army Gen. John Abizaid, passes through rainbow side boys on the flight deck aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75). Carrier Air Wing Three (CVW-3) is embarked aboard Truman and is providing close air support and conducting intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance over Iraq. The Truman Carrier Strike Group is on a regularly scheduled deployment in support of the Global War on Terrorism.
Roger Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 07:52:44     69.40.18.134
Is the USS COMFORT still in the Gulf War area?
Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 22:17:14     12.72.118.194
Gray skies means that I am spending more time indoors than outdoors taking train pictures. I have been giving a few extra hours a week to the Postal History Foundation. It has interesting, informative and fun.
Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 22:16:05     12.72.118.194
Some of the sellers on eBay are selling Karcher"FREE" Vietnam era covers as rare pieces. I usually mail each one and suggest that there description ought to make prominent use of the words "high probability that this is a fraud."
Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 22:14:58     12.72.118.194
Larry - you're welcome.
Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 22:14:22     12.72.118.194
If nothing else, the chat page does provoke some interesting comments
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 22:13:50     68.57.210.254
Stew - Got the covers today... Thanks!
Mike Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 20:35:59     172.173.50.122
Lot's of rain in Northern California.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 17:06:18     68.57.210.254
Okay... the server is acting up!
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 16:33:54     38.117.188.10
Still a bunch of Karcher crap on e-bay; even described as such by USCS memebers. At least he isn't complaining that people are underpricing his fraudulent junk.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 15:47:34     38.117.188.10
Vasco De Gama, Goa, India (Feb. 15, 2005) - Commanding Officer, USS Blue Ridge (LCC 19), Capt. J. Stephen Maynard, speaks with members of the Indian media during a press conference on the ship's main deck. Blue Ridge, flagship of the U.S. Seventh Fleet, came to India on a scheduled port visit. While in port, the ship's approximately 1,000 Sailors, Marines, and staff members will conduct community service projects and get to learn more about the Indian culture.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 15:46:24     38.117.188.10
NORFOLK, Va. (NNS) -- The Los Angeles-class fast-attack submarine USS Newport News (SSN 750) returns to Norfolk Naval Station Feb. 15, after a six-month deployment.

Newport News deployed to the North Atlantic in August 2004, conducting joint operations with allies. The crew then demonstrated the great flexibility of fast attack submarines, transiting to the Central Command Area of Responsibility in support of national security interests and the global war on terrorism.


Taze would have done covers.


lbbrennan Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 14:46:33     38.117.188.10
The "to join" info also is a button on the USCS homepage. We have to make this easy to find and complete to encourage new and returning members. Bill Wise, when you rejoin make sure you notify the Secretary of this fact and, if possible, provide your old number.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 11:24:04     68.57.210.254
Bill - I sent you the link to join USCS:

http://www.uscs.org/join/tojoin.htm


bill wise Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 11:22:21     205.188.116.200
HI I WOAD LIKE TO KNOW HOW TO REJOIN USCS
I HAVE BEEN OUT OVER 20 YEARS NOW, AND TO IS RON REVIES AROUND
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 09:19:44     68.57.210.254
Steve - I promise I won't raise my hand when you and Paul are bidding! Will my wife need a different bidder # than me? ;-)
SteveS Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 08:51:56     65.213.44.9
Larry, solution for the USCS convention auction: don't raise your hand when Paul or I are bidding. That works out for all 3 of us. ;-)
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 07:42:20     68.57.210.254
Does anyone know what year April 11 became National Submarine Day?
Roger Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 06:26:22     69.40.18.134
Hi Guys,
Got some very nice short bar killers back from the USS HOPPER dated 2/04/05 with OSC and PC autograph on the back of each.

Also got some cover back from USS COMFORT with cystal clear t-9 cancels and OSC on the back!!! Dated 2/10/05.
Is the comfort still in the Gulf area, or was she ever there?


mike meister Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 00:24:49     64.12.116.200
received covers today from USS JUNEAU nicely done and covers from USNS Stephen Pless with cachet pmd at Saipan on 2/6. Also a cover from VAQ 130 flown on 1/30 in support of the first electons in Iraq pmd on Trueman on 2/5.
Mark Monday, February 14, 2005 at 23:07:41     66.58.131.250
Hi Mike and Larry...
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 22:54:23     68.57.210.254
Here's Bob Patkin's new website:

http://www.postalhistorystore.com/


Dave Kent Monday, February 14, 2005 at 21:11:37     68.9.230.72
Bob Patkin's still in business -- saw him at a show a while ago, and on eBay. He must have a new URL.
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 19:47:50     68.57.210.254
Here's another bad link in the Links section:

Bob Patkin's Covers for Collectors


Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 19:45:31     68.57.210.254
Does anyone know if "Fortunes of War Collectibles" is still in business? It still shows up in the Links section of this site and has a phone number that is no longer in service.
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 19:32:16     68.57.210.254
EB has Nathan Hale cachets.
Chas Henry Monday, February 14, 2005 at 17:41:55     64.168.104.154
(And I don't even have a color printer...)
Chas Henry Monday, February 14, 2005 at 17:38:17     64.168.104.154
The legitimate return-to-port cancellation is listed at $145 on the bizub.com/LibertyBell link. Guess I'll have to be satisfied with my print-out copy!
Chas Henry Monday, February 14, 2005 at 17:09:36     64.168.104.154
Or, actually (I guess) 1500 "3RD DAY" covers?! (First day in port.)
Chas Henry Monday, February 14, 2005 at 17:00:21     64.168.104.154
Both Larrys - Thanks much for the links. So the NOA caper produced 300 back-dated "FDCs" and somewhat tarnished the entire event (and also produced 1500 legitimate FDCs). Valuations of both of them should prove interesing. It's quite a good cachet of the ship and capsule, well detailed. Too bad about the "back STORY"!
lbbrennan Monday, February 14, 2005 at 16:38:02     64.12.116.200
here's a link for space recovery ships. I cannot verify the details or price but it's something to start. http://www.bizubcomm.com/LibertyBell/Mercury.htm
lbbrennan Monday, February 14, 2005 at 16:38:01     64.12.116.200
here's a link for space recovery ships. I cannot verify the details or price but it's something to start. http://www.bizubcomm.com/LibertyBell/Mercury.htm
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:55:20     68.57.210.254
Does anyone know about a set of covers titled "Military Asset" that has cards from the ProSet Desert Storm series. They are all on larger #9 sized Airmail Envelopes. They have one of the cards attached to the envelope and are postmarked from the ship shown on the card. There are about 100 of them.
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:43:24     67.177.96.92
Derayan's post is interesting. He's in Amsterdam and posting about a French web site.
Greg Jacobs Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:40:28     67.177.96.92
Hi guys.
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:39:40     68.57.210.254
John - Remind me not to be on so many items at this year's convention... or tell Steve and Paul not to bid against me. ;-)
john young Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:37:53     68.193.177.218
Ahoy Maties!
Getting ready to put together Floor Auction
for USCS Convention at PIPEX (27-29 May 2005).
Already received several donations from Stewart Milstein, Sidney Fingerhood,Dan Jacobs & Glenn Smith. PLEASE DON'T WAIT TO THE LAST MINUTE!
Dave Kent Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:30:49     68.9.230.72
I believe the postal clerk in NOA was court martialed for "backdating" first day covers of the Project Mercury stamp, and aquitted for lack of firm evidence. Virtually all philatelic references, however, describe the covers as backdated.
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:26:19     68.57.210.254
Today is nickel listing day on eBay... you can sure tell by the number of new listings!
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:14:46     68.57.210.254
Mercury/Atlas 6
USS Noa (DD-841) Mercury Commemorative Stamp

http://www.spacephilatelics.com/suchap1-14.html


lbbrennan Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:06:06     152.163.100.200
Of course, Larry, thanks to you for the kind tranlation.
lbbrennan Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:05:16     152.163.100.200
Thanks to Derayan for the kind notice -- this should be of interest for the Asiatic Fleet collectors and perhaps George Saqqal might find something here for his interesting series of articles on the Yangtze River Patrol.
lbbrennan Monday, February 14, 2005 at 15:03:57     152.163.100.200
Has anyone else seen a USS NOA (DD-841) cover cancelled 20FEB62 with the Project Mercury stamp? Mine is unaddressed and uncacheted. My guess is that the ships did not have the Project Mercury stamps on board so perhaps this is a backdate.
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 13:45:14     68.57.210.254
Chas - Here's an excerpt: "What's that? Look out! SPLASH!"
Chas Henry Monday, February 14, 2005 at 13:42:11     64.168.104.154
You know what would be a great idea for the LOG would be to run an excerpt from "SPLASHDOWN" - especially the first recovery...
Chas Henry Monday, February 14, 2005 at 13:30:50     64.168.104.154
Larry LaF - New "BOAT" smell??!! (;-)
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 13:21:00     68.57.210.254
It translates loosely like this:

"Good Day Gentleman,

I inform you of our new site:

www.histoire-et-documents.fr

History of the French troops in China 1900-1931 [through the symbolic military system].

Thank you in advance for your visit."

I went to the site... everything appears to be in French. Sorry for the translation, it's been 20+ years since I took French.


Derayan Monday, February 14, 2005 at 12:37:05     83.114.219.175
Monsieur bonjour,
Je vous informe de notre nouveau site:
www.histoire-et-documents.fr
L'Histoire des troupes Françaises en Chine 1900/1931 a travers
la symbolique miltaire.Par avance nous vous remercions de visite.
Ned Harris Monday, February 14, 2005 at 08:46:17     63.184.112.112
Mark: Please contact me regarding ice station covers. Nedlinda@earthlink.net
drew Monday, February 14, 2005 at 08:12:03     64.223.125.98
Hello all, it is taking longer than I previously thought to switch to the new server. I will post a message here when the transfer has happened.
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 00:28:38     68.57.210.254
Richard - Are these the DPS covers?
Richard D. Jones 3933 Monday, February 14, 2005 at 00:20:04     67.35.140.2
Irene Fager lived over in Tampa and had tons of submersible covers. As Dave Kent mentions, some of those submersibles would dive several times a week and she had covers for many of the dives. She developed some very special relationships with some of the submersible pilots and they provided her with news and dive details for her newsletter.
Earlier in the 60s she wrote a column for Inner and Outer Space and before that for Nuclear News both put out by Don Schultz in Appleton WI.
When they went by the wayside, she started her own newsletter, One Half-Fathom. She said she wasn't much of a swimmer, so 3 feet was deep enough for her.

Larry LaFoe Monday, February 14, 2005 at 00:14:15     68.57.210.254
Richard - Thanks!
Richard D. Jones 3933 Monday, February 14, 2005 at 00:11:55     67.35.140.2
Thanks all for the comments on the LOG. wrapping up March issue this week as soon as I get a few more pages finished off.

Larry LaFoe check this site for sub covers
http://www.gdeb.com/store/

Welcome aboard Mark.


Jake Monday, February 14, 2005 at 00:04:09     24.61.129.90
G'Nite Larry,Mark & Richard, pumpkin time here on the Cape
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:59:02     66.58.131.250
Interesting reading some of the post over the past month. So much to learn about the various areas of this area of the hobby.
Jake Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:58:54     24.61.129.90
Evening Richard, Thanks for another great issue of the LOG
Jake Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:56:19     24.61.129.90
Mark
Yes I to have been lucky to meet with some of the folks on this board
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:54:09     66.58.131.250
This evening is my first time on this board. Do know a few of the folks here.
Jake Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:53:05     24.61.129.90
Welcome aboard Mark, nice to see a new name here
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:48:49     66.58.131.250
Hi Jake and Robert.
Jake Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:47:25     24.61.129.90
Good Evening Gentlemen
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:30:08     66.58.131.250
Welcome dcampbell!
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:26:29     68.57.210.254
Yes... indeed!
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:25:47     66.58.131.250
There are definately may different spins on topics on this site. Looks like it will proove to be interesting.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:24:13     68.57.210.254
I'm here throughout the day... I like to think I bring another "opinion" to the site ;-)
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:22:09     66.58.131.250
This is only the third or fouth time that I have been to this site. Will have to stop by more often.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:21:01     68.57.210.254
Good Luck! On the left, under "Search this site" you can search for any keyword and it will take you to the appropriate post (for years!) and to the LOG Indexes if an article has been written about your keyword.
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:19:14     66.58.131.250
Got it. I just copied all the messages that are posted to read later.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:17:55     68.57.210.254
You have to "Reload" to refresh.
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:13:23     66.58.131.250
Thought that was enough for a start. Guess this thing does not automatically update every so often. Amazing what you find under the "Help" tab :-)
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:09:30     68.57.210.254
Mark you forgot to mention you collect sub covers and pre-1960 Antarctica and all Polar covers ;-) ... and some Air Force covers too!
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:08:08     68.57.210.254
Hi Dick
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 23:07:47     68.57.210.254
Hi Mark & Dave
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 22:53:18     66.58.131.250
Hi Tjossem. Now I know this program updates itself when someone enters a posting.
Tjossem Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 22:51:17     69.29.228.39
Mark,
Welcome aboard!
Mark Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 22:45:49     66.58.131.250
Hi Gang - Mark from Anchorage, Alaska here for the first time. Collect anything to do with the Ice Islands and Ice Stations. Also have taken the deep dive into the world of the submariner.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 21:46:39     68.57.210.254
Apparently there are 25,000 + different covers!
Stewart B. Milstein Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 21:45:30     12.72.122.166
Hi Larry - Irene fager's collection is in the hands of her daughter who has not made any decision on disposing of the collection. I was once a staff writer and a columnist for OHF.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 21:33:41     68.57.210.254
I think this is the first time I've seen an "unidentified" member on the chat page?
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 21:32:39     68.57.210.254
I was aboard the ARLEIGH BURKE before it was commissioned. New ships are so impressive! After they get their first 20 coats of paint in the passageways, they loose that new boat smell! ;-)
Chas Henry Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 21:28:53     64.168.104.154
"x" marks the spot?
Chas Henry Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 21:28:09     64.168.104.154
Notice there's a show on the ARLEIGH BURKE class destroyers tonight (Discovery Channel). Originally aired right after Thanksgiving, but I somehow missed it...(!)
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 21:27:00     68.57.210.254
Hi, li'l "x"
drew Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 21:23:52     64.222.114.66
I will copy over the chat file to the new server, though since it takes awhile for the internet to pick up the address of the new server, some posts may be lost.
mike meister Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 20:57:48     152.163.100.200
Sorry Larry that was supposed to be One Half Fathom.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 20:51:15     68.57.210.254
Can't you replicate them on the new server?
drew Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 20:47:07     64.222.114.66
Please note that any posts between 4pm today and 12pm tomorrow will most likely be lost due to the server move. I apologize for the inconvenience.
mike meister Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 20:43:10     152.163.100.200
Hi Larry. I have heard of copies of I&O being in auctions in the LOG but not recently. I have also never heard mention of what became of Irenes' collection. She collected Oceanographic covers from all over the world, both naval and commercial as well as covers from the tourist subs.
Duane Wilson Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 18:35:35     204.124.93.249
Received this by email today:

Submarine Commander Is Relieved From Post


Associated Press

TOKYO - The commander of an attack submarine that ran aground in the western Pacific Ocean last month has been relieved from his post after an investigation found that critical safety procedures were overlooked.

Cmdr. Kevin Mooney was relieved and reprimanded following disciplinary proceedings at the Yokosuka naval base just south of Tokyo, the U.S. Seventh Fleet said in a statement on its Web site Saturday. Officials weren't immediately available to comment.

The USS San Francisco was on its way to Australia when it struck an undersea mass of rock that was not on the ship's charts. Machinist Mate 2nd Class Joseph Allen Ashley, 24, of Akron, Ohio, died of injuries suffered during the crash, and 23 other members of the crew were injured. The submarine was conducting underwater operations about 350 miles south of Guam.

The investigation into the incident found that "several critical navigational and voyage planning procedures were not being implemented aboard San Francisco."

"By not ensuring these standard procedures were followed, Mooney hazarded his vessel," the statement said.

Cmdr. Andrew Hale, deputy commander of the Guam-based Submarine Squadron 15, has assumed the duties as commanding officer of the San Francisco, the statement said.

The San Francisco's outer hull was damaged in the incident, but the nuclear reactor was unaffected. The submarine made its way back to its home port in Guam under its own power.


Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 18:27:26     68.57.210.254
http://www.csg2.navy.mil/jimmycartercommissioning.htm
Gregory A. Mews Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 17:53:28     65.26.213.150
There is a nice website for those interested in the Jimmy Carter Commissioning coming up on Feb. 19th.
www.csg2.navy.mil/jimmycarter.htm
The site includes a color picture of the Carter's crest.
Received some nice covers back from the USS Benfold DDG-65, which included corner card and purple-colored crest and circular date-stamp, dated Jan 31. The ship was involed in Operation Unified Assistance.
Dan Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 17:31:31     24.25.181.25
Is the change to a new webserver complete? I haven't noticed any difference in speed which is normally super fast for me.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 17:03:37     68.57.210.254
Does anyone have any back issues of Irene Fager's newsletter "One Half Fathom" for sale?
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 16:34:50     68.57.210.254
Dave - When you say catalog... are you talking about a sales catalog or a checklist catalog?
Dave Kent Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 15:55:58     68.9.230.72
I was working on a collection of covers from submersibles, but got a catalog of them and find that there are thousands and thousands of dives for which covers have been made. I kind of backed off on them when I found how many there are.
Chas Henry Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 12:51:54     64.168.104.154
Gee, where is everybody? "Sunday mornin' comin' down" ?:) Looks like Celtics fans are in for a pleasant surprize - especially if you have the officials on your side...!:)
Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 12:15:48     67.177.96.92
What are you upgrading to? I always liked Compaq Proliants myself.
Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 12:03:38     67.177.96.92
Ok.
Karl Zurn Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 11:35:11     64.222.93.67
Greg,
We are in the process of upgrading our server.
Greg Jacobs Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 10:32:44     67.177.96.92
The site is very slow to load since it moved to a new server. Frequent time outs.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 10:17:37     68.57.210.254
I just purchased 40 signed Submersible covers... does anyone collect these?

Example: DSV Turtle has Dive date, Dive no. Lat. Long. Depth Pilot Co-Pilot Observer signatures.


Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 01:02:54     68.57.210.254
Morning
Mike Kaup Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 01:02:23     4.179.37.99
Howdy Larry.
Jake Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 00:31:12     24.131.164.192
prometheus

Sorry I missed you on here.
All is well here on the homefront


Jake Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 00:29:29     24.131.164.192
Hi Larry La.
Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 23:38:58     68.57.210.254
Evening Stew
Stewart B. Milstein Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 20:55:22     12.72.119.213
Good evening, gentlemen.
prometheus Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 20:51:43     4.247.140.60
By the way I collect Naval Covers But not the fancy Cachet types
Just real mail mostly home.
I have quite a few I think Jake shared my USS Villalobos here a while back,
My personal Favorite is a Postcard home from the Trenton,
at port in France
sailor on deck watching Germans bomb france writes home " don't worry dad the germans would never Bomb an American Navy Ship"
prometheus Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 20:36:03     4.247.140.60
Larry L -
Just selected pages here and there, It also mentions a stop in Cuba, Basically a day to day note book of happenings on and about the ship and crew.
I have no doubt to realness, The estate this came out of full of Naval History, Swords, pistols, Uniforms , Etc
The owner now does not like paper items unless Civil War related
Book is arranged in an interesting format
First Part Ship info weight etc
2nd part Crew info name rank assignment/job
This was left with a few pages Blank extra so he could make changes as he went along.
The a Neatly written Title page Extra large Writing Underlined for emphasis
and then just dailey Notes when where what why, who got on who got off, etc etc
Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 20:23:47     68.57.210.254
Prometheus: If it's real, I suspect it should be worth $300 in trade. Have you read it? Does it follow the ship's known history?

USS Essex, the third ship of that name, a wooden screw steamer, was built by the United States and Donald Mackay at East Boston, Massachusetts; commissioned at the Boston Navy Yard on 3 October 1876, Commander W. S. Schley commanding; and reported to the North Atlantic Squadron.

During the following year Essex cruised to Liberia and along the west coast of Africa and in 1878-79 joined the South Atlantic Squadron.


Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 20:21:17     68.57.210.254
Dave & Steve - Thanks!
Dave Kent Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 20:18:57     68.9.230.72
'Scuse me. NAUTILUS first under was Jan 17, 1955 (not 1954), just 50 years ago. Don was a plankholder in NAUTILUS.
Dave Kent Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 20:17:13     68.9.230.72
Dynamic Philatelic Society (DPS) folded up shop some years ago. Don Wilson is still making cachets -- the last I know was for the 50th anniversary of NAUTILUS' first underway (he was aboard back in 1954). He can't drive since his stroke but takes a taxi to the Groton post office, where they probably all know him.
prometheus Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 20:13:24     4.247.140.60
Dave Kent
He titled it the "Incidental Voyage of the USS Essex "
SteveS Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 19:59:45     4.246.87.17
Larry, Don Wilson is still a USCS member, I don't know if he is actively making cachets.
prometheus Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 19:44:29     4.247.215.63
Thanks Dave Kent-
The little Log book is a fascinating read,
The guy wants 300 dollars worth of my Civil War Orders and stuff (CSA) in trade .
I just can not decide.
Thanks for input.

HEY Jake hope all is well with you and your's


Larry LaFoe Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 19:21:22     68.57.210.254
Does anyone know if DPS (Dynamic Philatelic Society) or DRW (Donald R. Wilson) are still producing cachets?
Stewart B. Milstein Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 18:56:04     12.72.121.11
2 covers rec'd from the USS BENFOLD for the tsuname relief expedition. The covers were cancelled Jan 31, 2005 and bear a cachet, a corner card, and a Type 9.
Stewart B. Milstein Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 18:55:06     12.72.121.11
Hi Dave. I didn't know that in your youth you were an apple knocker.
Dave Kent Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 18:49:25     68.9.230.72
This would be a department log book, not to be confused with THE official log book (called a "smooth" or "deck" log), which are kept in the National Archives. These department logs are very rare, and I've never seen one offered before. I think you need to research the rare book market for information.
prometheus Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 17:10:48     4.247.215.63
Hello All
Got a small question ,
Have been offerd the log Book of the Navigator of the Steamer USS Essex,
the book starts on her commissioning day (found that on DANFS site) 3 oct 1976 and continues till Oct 20 1879
Lists all crew and changes as they occur, all ports visited, Ship info lenght etc. Even the Mundane things like we waited 2 hours for the tugs to come the seven miles down river to us.
The gentleman making the offer of trade for this item wants $300 worth of Value.
Does this seem fair.
Are items like routinely sold and if so where might I find like transactions to compare

Great penmenship


mike meister Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 16:59:50     64.12.116.200
very nicely done covers arrived today from Abe Lincoln with the double ring cancel dated 2/1. Also a couple covers from HS 2 pm'd on 2/1 with Lincolns short bar cancel.
Dave Kent Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 13:03:51     68.9.230.72
Elgin: I grew up in Auburn, southwest of Syracuse. My aunt lived in Syracuse and worked as a secretary at the Manlius School in the 1950s and early 1960s. She married an Army sergeant who was assigned there and they remained happily married until both died a couple of years ago.
Dave Kent Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 13:01:21     68.9.230.72
Norm: we are aware of the "Rodeo" postmarks but haven't been able to determine just what that means. The military is pretty closed-mouthed about just where each APO is location in or near Iraq -- still afraid of anthrax and other mail problems. The Postal Service can tell you which APO numbers are currently "active," but will not disclose the locations of each. However, the Military Postal History Society has published a pretty complete list in its quarterly Bulletin.
drew Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 09:54:38     64.222.114.66
Hello all. We should be switching to a new webserver this weekend. If you find any problems with the site please email webmaster@uscs.org
Norman Elrod Friday, February 11, 2005 at 23:05:09     64.53.52.226
I have a question about current AE cancels from Iraq. Today I received a letter from a friend at FOB Cobra (APO AE 09374). The cancel on the cover is double ring circular date stamp canceled at APO AE 09392. It is dated FEB 1 with no year date and has the text "RODEO #4" within the double rings on the opposite side (above) the APO AE number.

What is the meaning of "RODEO #4"? Another question is where can I find a web link to all the zip codes used for our military bases? Any help will be appreciated. Norman


e sink Friday, February 11, 2005 at 22:47:32     68.85.255.77
Dave Kent: Noted your comment about growing up in
the "snowbelt of Central New York"...where? I went to high school at Manlius (Military) School near Syracuse and experienced several rough winters from 1959 thru 1962 there but not much worse than winters in my home area of Tioga County, PA near Elmira and Corning NY.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 11, 2005 at 22:04:44     68.57.210.254
Looking for the following covers:

USS Yosemite covers from 1982 - 1985
NAS Barbers Point covers from 1986-1989
USS California covers from 1990 - August 10, 1992


Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 11, 2005 at 20:31:11     12.72.120.6
PC2 Thomas Coonors - thank you for all your efforts. We appreciate the work that it takes to create a good srike with the cancel and the cachet.
Wolfgang Hechler, Germany Friday, February 11, 2005 at 18:19:06     62.226.146.245
Don't give up to hope!
Today I've got all my "lost" covers from the Post Office in Groton. I had sent one cover for each anniversary day of the following 5 subs:
USS. AUGUSTA (SSN-710), USS. NAUTILUS (SSN-571), USS. HENRY M. JACKSON (SSBN-730), USS. HARFORD (SSN-768)and USS. TOPEKA (SSN-754). All arrived the same day and they all have the pictorial cancels from September 2004 until January 2005. All covers are in perfect condition!
Thanks a lot to the postal-clerks in Groton. BRAVO ZULU!
Ed 10975 Friday, February 11, 2005 at 18:04:20     12.76.174.13
I've been in Newfoundland twice and everyone there calls themselves goofy newfies and they seem proud of it.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 11, 2005 at 17:43:50     68.57.210.254
I was just recording the submarine commissioning dates into a spreadsheet... there have been only TWO submarine commissionings in the 21st Century (counting the USS Jimmy Carter)?????
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 11, 2005 at 17:37:06     68.57.210.254
All you cachet makers out there: If you're making a cachet for the commissioning of the USS Jimmy Carter, I'd be interested in purchasing one. If you have any submarine commissioning covers from past commissionings, I'm interested in those too!
Dan Friday, February 11, 2005 at 17:01:10     24.25.181.25
Thanks Dave.
Dave Kent Friday, February 11, 2005 at 15:22:26     68.9.230.72
Actually I have a gas grill on the sundeck that I use all summer -- resent these cold New England winters 'cause it's too cold to cook outside. I've managed to keep the stamps and covers out of the kitchen and bathrooms, but otherwise they pretty much crowd into every other room in the house. You know those rolling bookcases you see in libraries with a sloping flat top to hold a dictionary? I have one in my living room, but it holds a Postmark Catalog, not a dictionary.
PS - Dan, I found your cover and mailed it this morning.
Roger Friday, February 11, 2005 at 15:18:55     69.40.18.134
Dan:
Small Wolrd!!
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 11, 2005 at 13:08:37     68.57.210.254
Dave - Are you saying your Hobby Room is your house? Does that mean you have a BBQ outside for a Kitchen and a hammock for a Bedroom... and a wooden structure with a half-moon cutout for a Bathroom? ;-)
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 11, 2005 at 11:54:10     67.177.96.92
Hi Larry, Wolfgang
john young Friday, February 11, 2005 at 10:27:48     68.193.177.218
Larry Lafoe: It's that time of the century!
The MACKINAW was commissioned in Dec 1944, the
WHEC's were built (1966-72), the WMEC's (210's)
were built (1960's)and the WPB's (Point)were built
in (1960's & 1970's). In fact the "Queen of the
Fleet" USCGC STORIS was comissioned in Sept 1942,
while the "Black Fleet" (buoytenders) were built
during World War II.

Dan Friday, February 11, 2005 at 10:01:56     24.25.181.25
Roger- My first grand daughter was born in Newfoundland and she is also referred to as a "goofy newfie".

Roger Friday, February 11, 2005 at 09:11:10     69.40.18.134
I bought and have bid on several of my own cachets on Ebay this week that were on Ebay at rediculously low prices....$3-$4 each What a find!! LOL!!!
Roger Friday, February 11, 2005 at 09:08:13     69.40.18.134
Hi Guys:
Got some T-9 cancels with excellent strikes from USS SHOUP (Tsunami ship) yesterday dated 1/20/05. Autographed by the PC. Also got some from the USS ESSEX dated 1/18/05...she too was over there as well..I think?
Roger Friday, February 11, 2005 at 07:24:45     69.40.18.134
Dan:
I was born in ARGENTIA while my Father was stationed there in 1948. He called me his "goofy newfie" for years, and still does.
Dan Friday, February 11, 2005 at 07:19:35     24.25.181.25
Welcome to the chat room PC2 Thomas Connors. My son was stationed at NAVFAC ARGENTIA during the late 80's and early 90's. Could you both have been there at the same time?
PC2 Thomas Connors Friday, February 11, 2005 at 02:03:16     64.252.120.251
I would just like to say hello. I may have done some covers for some of you over the years. I was stationed onborad the Uss Guadalcanal, USNavfac Argentia and I am also the plankowner PC on the USS Laboon (DDG 58). Although I don,t collect covers myself, being a collector I understand how important quality is to you. I hope if any one has received my covers, they met with your approval!
Stewart B. Miltein Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 23:07:22     12.72.120.41
The Recovery list from NASA is riddled with mis-spellings. I am checking with the Navy to see if they have a diferent, and more complete list.
Stewart B. Miltein Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 23:03:28     12.72.120.41
Yes, it rained in Tucson today, and will rain tomorrow and Sat and there are flash flood warnings in the forecast.
Ed 10975 Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 23:03:02     12.76.174.25
Hi Jake and Stewart
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 22:47:29     67.177.96.92
Hi Jake
Jake Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 22:46:17     24.61.129.53
Hi Larry & Greg
Jake Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 22:32:06     24.61.129.53
Chas. Henry
Thanks for the heads up, this time I saw it and may try to bid for mself, as its less than a month after my birth date.

Sorry to say that it is to early for what I'm looking for, need 4/15/65 on up till now.


Dave Kent Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 21:34:42     68.9.230.72
Dan: I'm not sure you understand the scope of the problem. My "hobby area" is the entire house!
Dan Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 21:32:49     24.25.181.25
Hi Dave. That's OK. If your hobby area looks anything like mine, I'm not surprised.
Dave Kent Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 21:29:45     68.9.230.72
Hi, Dan. Got your letter. Haven't found the cover yet.
Dave Kent Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 21:23:36     68.9.230.72
Obviously the Navy has an interest in a ship under construction as soon as the first piece of steel is in place, for the ship is being built under contract. However, the ship officially remains in the hands of the building yard until the Navy has taken her out for a test drive (we call is "sea trials"). Once any deficiencies found during sea trials have been corrected, the ship is turned over to the Navy, or "delivered." Delivery is a formal process, with papers signed and folks shaking hands -- JIMMY CARTER was delivered to the Navy on Dec. 22. Our own Paul Huber, as a Navy captain, was Superintendent of Shipbuilding at Groton in 1981 when USS OHIO was delivered, and he was the one to sign the papers. He said it was the only time in his life that he ever spent two billion dollars with one stroke of his pen.
Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:54:11     64.168.104.154
"The fog of war" I guess.
Dave Kent Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:41:02     68.9.230.72
Often people don't think to preserve historic objects until it's too late. If you go to the Harry Truman Presidential Library in Independence, Mo. you can see the table on which the Japanese surrender document was signed on the deck of USS MISSOURI Sep 2, 1945. Well, maybe. Story from john Milewski's nephew when he commanded MISSOURI in the 1980s: the table came from the officers' wardroom, which is near the open deck where the ceremony took place. Several hours after the ceremony it occurred to them that they should save the table, but by then it had already been put back. They walked into the wardroom and looked around, but realized that all the tables looked the same. So they just picked one and set it aside as the "historic signing" table.
Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:34:34     64.168.104.154
Jake - Nathan Hale Mail Auction 189. DD-402 keel-laying cancelled 4/15/37 at Boston Navy Yard, cachet by Hutnick. I think it's still open...
Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:32:43     64.168.104.154
I wonder if the boat davits were saved from the NOA?
Dave Kent Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:29:16     68.9.230.72
It is appallingly expensive to preserve old ships. For one thing, they usually aren't in that good shape when they are retired, and believe it or not salt water is incredibly corrosive. It costs millions to keep ships afloat and in decent repair, and Congress isn't willing to spend tax dollars on old museum ships. I believe the navy only has two -- CONSTITUTION in Boston, NAUTILUS in Groton -- maybe a couple more. The rest, and there are more than 50 old ships preserved around the country, are in the hands of private foundations that struggle constantly to get enough money to keep the ships in good condition. Almost every year we hear of another ship organization that is near bankrupcy because admission fees and other fundraising efforts just can't come up with the money needed. NOA's work in the space program just wasn't significant enough to justify keeping her.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:28:34     68.57.210.254
John - Why are there so many CG ships being commissioned? Are they in response to 9/11 or is it normal to have sooooo many CG Commissionings?
Jake Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:23:54     24.61.129.53
Dinner bell BBL
Jake Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:23:13     24.61.129.53
just didn't see your heads up
Jake Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:22:35     24.61.129.53
Chas. Henry-- No still looking for them, just did see yourheads up I guess
Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:20:32     64.168.104.154
Jake - What happened, did you lose interest in getting hold of a 4/15 cover?
Jake Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:18:05     24.61.129.53
Hi Ed

Think you have it right as far as Navy owning a ship and you are right about it belonging to the Navy till stricken from the list, after this, most are sold for scrap or disposed off, like selling to other countries


Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:17:49     64.168.104.154
LBBrennan - While I'm at it, I'd like to re-inforce my argument about destroyer squadrons, at least during the '50s, when I served as a radioman with CDS6:
I have here an issue of OUR NAVY from 2/1/57 and in the "Bulletin Board of Naval Interest" (p. 9)-
Destroyer Divisions 71 and 72 returned a day apart to San Diego after their 7th Fleet stint. DesDiv 71 includes...(755, 759, 760, 761)...
DesDiv 72 includes...(558, 644, 746, 832).

Then, again, under "Partners" (p.13):
Working with USS SHANGRI-LA (CVA-38) during the current tour with the Asiatic Fleet is Destroyer Division 132, consisting of USS O'BRIEN (DD-725), WALKE (DD-723), HARRY E. HUBBARD (753), and E.G.SMALL (835).


Jake Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:13:15     24.61.129.53
Chas. Henry
No I didn't
Ed 10975 Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:11:52     12.76.172.154
I believe that a ship becomes Navy property after being accepted following sucessful sea trials. Commissioning, a ceremony, comes at a later date. Decommissioned ships are still Navy property until they are stricken from the list and disposed of with the possible exception of museum ships.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:07:48     68.57.210.254
USS Noa - Stricken and scraped in 1991 (Doesn't look like Spain took too good care of it!)
Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 19:02:38     64.168.104.154
Hey Jake! Did you get that 4/15 cancel I alerted you about?
Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:55:25     64.168.104.154
Besides, that doesn't answer the question as to why the ship wasn't preserved just for being the FIRST! You don't suppose it could have been sheer, callous disregard do you? (Not to mention absolute stupidity.) But what the heck, maybe Spain will see the value of it, since it was sold "dirt cheap" according to a news article at the time about the entire squadron.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:54:41     68.57.210.254
Evenin'
Jake Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:51:56     24.61.129.53
G'Evening Gentlemen
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:51:11     68.57.210.254
Only 3 times did a NON-Prime Recovery Ship actually recover the Astronauts.

It's funny looking at the list (and the Dave's point):Most of the Gemini Missions had 24 Recovery Ships... by the time they got to Apollo-Soyuz, there was only 1!


Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:48:02     68.57.210.254
Chas - Here's a great site from NASA listing the Navy Recovery Ships:

http://history.nasa.gov/ships.html


Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:46:20     68.57.210.254
Maybe I'm not thinking clear... ?

If a soldier / sailor served during WW II for 2-4 years... were / are they entitled to ANY benefits... medical? dental? pay? (aside from disability) Does a soldier / sailor receive any benefits (REAL benefits - NOT last rung and no hope at a VA Hospital type benefits) if they don't retire or receive disability?

If no... then why would our Congress feel they should give away our tax dollars to Merchant Marines?


Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:46:09     64.168.104.154
Dave - Why do you suppose the NOA was assigned to be on that station at that time, for which she had modified boat davits?
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:39:44     68.57.210.254
So if a Merchant Marine served for 13 months... the bill would award him $1,000 a month? If a sailor served for 19 years (serving in WWII and Korea or Korea and Vietnam)... how much does he get a month?
SteveS Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:28:16     65.213.44.9
I also believe that Merchant Marines pay ended when a voyage ended, including when a ship was sunk from underneath them. So time in a prison camp was unpaid time and when released, they had to pay for passage home or hope someone would give them free passage. There was friction between some Armed Guard crews and some merchant crews over pay though in general most crews got along really well and helped each other out. As you say Larry, a very hard problem with issues far beyond the money.
lbbrennan Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 18:03:17     38.117.188.10
The conventionally-powered aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63) is pushed away from the pier by tug boats on board Commander Fleet Activities Base Yokosuka, Japan. Kitty Hawk demonstrates power projection and sea control as the U.S. Navy's only forward-deployed aircraft carrier, operating from Yokosuka, Japan.
lbbrennan Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 17:33:07     38.117.188.10
Enlisted men in the USN in WWII earned $21.00 per month while merchant mariners earned a lot more and overtime. They could refuse certain assignments while desertion for sailors was punishable by death. Hard problem with issues far beyond the money.
lbbrennan Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 17:31:09     38.117.188.10
WWII Merchant Mariners Seek Belated Thanks

By PAULINE JELINEK
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The bullets and torpedoes they faced were just as real, but World War II merchant mariners say the government hasn't given them the same treatment as military personnel.

When the fighting ended, they got no homecoming parades, "no GI Bill, no nothing," said former mariner George Duffy of Seabrook, N.H.

Now there's proposed legislation to pay $1,000 monthly to the aged former civilian sailors, who hauled troops, tanks, bombers, fuel and other wartime goods to keep Allied forces supplied.

"My bill is a belated thank you," said Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif.

Advertisement






Similar measures have failed, and supporters say time is running out because the mariners are now in their 70s and 80s. Some were on Capitol Hill on Thursday to lobby lawmakers to support this latest effort.

A bill to give mariners or their widows $1,000 a month died last year before being reintroduced last month. Estimates on who might benefit vary widely, with some saying 60,000 are surviving and others saying only 10,000 need the money and would apply for it.

The merchant marine of the 1940s was a crucial third leg of the massive U.S. war effort. The military fought on the battlefront; American factories and workers produced equipment and goods on the homefront; merchant mariners were a link between the two.

Thousands were lost or injured in rough seas, to Japanese kamikaze pilots who crashed into their decks, or to German submarines that sank ships in their convoys.

Interactive
Profiles of New U.S. Senators



Latest News
House OKs Citizenship Check for Licenses
Democrats Demand Bush Halt Attacks on Reid

Senate OKs Limit on Class Action Lawsuits

WWII Merchant Mariners Seek Belated Thanks

Bankruptcy Overhaul Legislation Advances






But the sailors were technically civilians and had a traditional rivalry with military sailors, said Jack Green, a spokesman for the Naval Historical Center.

A Navy movement to put them under military control was scuttled during the war by shipping companies that held lucrative government contracts and by the men's union, which didn't want to lose control of the workers, historians say.

The rivalry and later general disinterest in the merchant marines' cause conspired to relegate them to second-class veterans.

Duffy recalled the disparate treatment he received compared with a friend in the Coast Guard.

Captured by the Germans at 20 and delivered to the Japanese, Duffy spent 37 months - exactly 1,119 days, he said - in Pacific prisoner of war camps. He endured scarce food and medicine and his prisoner work detail was forced to build the Japanese a railroad across Sumatra.

"I came home after this experience and had no benefits, no (paid college tuition under the) GI Bill, no nothing," Duffy said.

His friend got full military benefits after spending the entire war as a clerk in a New York office of the Coast Guard.

A little like today's civilian contractors working with the military in war zones, the 1940s seamen got higher pay than military counterparts - though not that much higher. They say the difference was negated once they calculated that they were paid only for time at sea - not shore time like the military - and they didn't get the insurance, health care, lower mortgage rates, preferred employment status and educational opportunities that returning armed forces got.

Frank Medeiros said he was paid $3,000 in 1943 for what had been billed as a four-month convoy to supply allied Russian troops at Murmansk. The round-trip run ended up taking 13 months, and two dozen of its three dozen merchant ships were lost to attacks along the way.

Now an 83-year-old part-time dispatcher for the union Masters, Mates and Pilots in San Francisco, he says grateful Russians later invited former mariners to visit, awarding them medals.

"And I got a letter from former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev," said Medeiros. "They called us patriots."

Of his own government, he says: "They shouldn't have done what they did to us."

A benefits bill was killed in the 1940s - "torpedoed by powerful military lobbyists who influenced congressmen and senators," said author Brian Herbert, who drew from government documents, diaries and survivor interviews to write his 2004 book, "The Forgotten Heroes: The Heroic Story of the United States Merchant Marine."

The mariners got veteran status - and therefore some limited benefits - when they sued the military in 1988, by which time some postwar programs had expired.

In 2000, Canada approved $34 million for one-time payments of up to $16,400 to its World War II merchant seaman, who also belatedly got veteran status.


Dave Kent Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 16:04:35     68.9.230.72
NOA's work in plucking John Glenn out of the Atlantic was pretty much accidental -- a case of being in the right place at the right time. It was supposed to be the carrier RANDOLPH, but NASA wasn't all that good at hitting the target in those early days of space and NOA turned out to be closer.
Dan Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 15:33:24     24.25.181.25
Log arrived in Maine today ahead of the snowstorm.
Chas Henry Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 12:45:27     64.168.104.154
LOG arrived yesterday in Sacramento, greatly appreciated (although I think "Out of the Past" should be arranged in chronological order...lol)Dave Kent - I wonder why the ship (NOA) that picked up the first astronaut (Glenn) wasn't preserved rather than being sold to Spain?
lbbrennan Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 12:28:37     38.117.188.10
Larry, Bet Kelso will be CO; it's normal for PCOs to put the ship in commission and I think since he is son of the former CNO it's a lock.
john young Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 10:55:59     68.193.177.218
Ahoy Matey! The FEB Log arrived in lower Hudson
Valley yesterday.
On Monday, cover from Coast Guard SKIPJACK with
cachet donated by USCS. Her mailing address is
on page 7, along with photo of cachet.
Received invitation to christening & launching of
CGC MACKINAW (WLBB 30) to be held on 2 APR 2005
at Marinette Marine.
lbbrennan: Thanks for the Coast Guard covers!
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 08:38:53     68.57.210.254
Does anyone have the mailing address to the Carter?
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 08:25:41     68.57.210.254
Does anyone know if Capt. Kelso will be the CO for the Commissioning of the Carter?
e sink Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 05:06:35     68.85.255.77
Received FEB Log in Chester County, PA yesterday...another superb one with great articles.
dcampbell Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 00:24:18     64.12.116.200
Hi Stewart: Received the covers you sent me. They are very nice. Thanks, Don C.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:57:08     24.61.129.53
G'Nite Tott
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:57:08     24.61.129.53
G'Nite Tott
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:54:41     64.12.116.200
GTG/a auction to snipe.hehehe See ya's later
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:53:24     64.12.116.200
Jake ;Our Friend Mr.brackin is back to the useual.When will he learn .LOL
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:51:48     24.61.129.53
ooops= major conversion
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:50:34     24.61.129.53
Larry L.
Ships can also be decommissioned when they are going in the Yards for a long peroid of time, like for major covnersion and overhaul, than ship will be recommissioned when its ready to go back on active duty
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:43:26     24.61.129.53
Larry L.

Been a long time, but my understanding of Commissioning Date is the first day of active service(duty)
When they go to reserve Fleet (mothball) they are decommissioned and that date is last day in service, but they can be recommissioned back into service at a later date, such as was the case with many ships after WWII that were caled up and recommissioned for the Korean War


Paul Helman Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:38:00     68.165.172.110
Great story about using hot water to melt snow. I spent a good number of years in an Industrial Chemical manufacturing plant where we had products that would solidify or makeup in the pipes at anything less than 160 degrees F. We would spend hours melting out the pipes with hot water. Couldn't use steam as it would "burn" the product.

Gave us more time to think about Naval Covers.

Been compiling more early Navy Day data. Soon I should have 100 + pages from the files from an early Navy League President. These should shed some light on the first few years of celebrations. I would sure like scans of any covers on 27 Oct in the 1920s. I have a few that I expect to put in a LOG article.


TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:37:28     64.12.116.200
Jake You still there?
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:29:30     68.57.210.254
You'd have to ask someone who knows... but I think the sub doesn't officially belong to the Navy until it is commissioned. I think it still belongs to the shipbuilder and they convey title (with a $50 fee at the DMV) at commissioning.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:27:43     68.57.210.254
Since the Carter is the last of the Seawolf Class... are they going to go back to the old numbering convention to SSN-780?
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:24:37     68.57.210.254
keel laying - construction begins... launching - sub goes into water for the first time... then sea trials... then commissioning
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:19:08     64.12.116.200
whats the differance between a commissioning and a luanching? I thought they were the same?
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:17:55     64.12.116.200
Larry:I Sent you a scan of it
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:16:19     64.12.116.200
Larry:I Sent you a scan of it
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:09:58     68.57.210.254
TOTT43 - I was looking for never addressed sub commissioning covers.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:02:33     24.61.129.53
brb ggp
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:01:26     64.12.116.200
Jake, I was sent 1 that I asked for allready:]
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:00:38     68.9.230.72
Got the next auction of Jim Klinger's collection from Jim Smith today. Some great stuff!
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 22:00:03     64.12.116.200
Mike I also picked up a Jimmy Carter Inauguration cover ,I wonder if they would pop a cancel from the boat on it?
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:59:23     68.9.230.72
I grew up in the snowbelt of Central New York, where it comes off the Great Lakes every day in Winter. The 40 inches we get here in Connecticut is a picnic compared to that.
Dan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:59:21     24.25.181.25
Bed time for me too.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:58:50     24.61.129.53
Tott---I'll send you a copy of the USCS Log when I send those covers tomorrow
Ed 10975 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:58:18     12.76.172.208
Stewart - Interesting idea about the water heater - expensive but I'll put it in the back of my mind.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:58:11     12.72.119.37
Good evening, gentlemen. Be back tomorrow.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:55:47     12.72.119.37
The last time I was feeling this content about snow, my brother-in-law died. We went back to NY and had to dig out from 20+ inches that Mother Nature gave us, plus all the snow I told me neighbor she could throw in the driveway. I tapped into the hot water heater with the garden hose, I literally melted off enough snow to get out of the driveway. I do not envy the guys with snow, I just have decided to avoid it. I know I cannot get a heart attack or a hernia shoveling sunshine.
Mike Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:55:21     172.161.120.159
Bye for now.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:54:41     24.61.129.53
Dan-- This time thy say rain for us till near the end and then we may get an inch or so
Mike Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:54:40     172.161.120.159
Rain this weekend in Northern California.
Mike Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:53:24     172.161.120.159
I have to send my USS JIMMY CARTER covers to Groton.
Dan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:52:11     24.25.181.25
Our weather gussers are saying 12 to 18 inches of snow and windy.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:52:09     24.61.129.53
Stew -- you really know how to pour salt in the wounds
Mike Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:52:04     172.161.120.159
Postcard show in Concord, California this weekend.
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:51:38     68.9.230.72
Raining already here in Connecticut.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:51:29     12.72.119.37
It snowed here in 2001 when we came looking for a house. If you can wipe the stuff off the car with the side of your hand, it does not count.
Ed 10975 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:51:03     12.76.172.208
Actually, Dan, you're going to get it this time and Jake will get rain. And in the middle here a couple of inches.
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:50:17     68.9.230.72
Last time I was in Tucson it snowed.
Dan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:50:04     24.25.181.25
Go ahead Stewart. Rub it in!
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:48:43     12.72.119.37
We will have the threat of rain for tomorrow in Tucson. That means I should leave the sunglasses in the car, rather than have them on before I step outside.
Ed 10975 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:48:35     12.76.172.208
8 on the chat!
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:48:26     24.61.129.53
Thats Okay Dan, seems like the old days here on the Cape when we had snow a good part of the winter
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:47:41     68.9.230.72
Looks like enough for a game of Texas Hold'em.
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:47:40     64.12.116.200
I'm in NY I think we are getting some too
Dan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:46:40     24.25.181.25
9 WOW! I guess I'm the only one on here who is eagerly awaiting to get severely pounded again by mother nature. (Oops! Sorry Jake. I forgot about the Cape).
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:45:12     12.72.119.37
If you are going to have a chapter meeting I can send you circuits if you give me enough lead time (10 days) to get a circuit together and send it to you. The members can share the cost of postage as part of having covers to go through.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:44:48     24.61.129.53
G'Evening Ed
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:44:17     12.72.119.37
And then there were 8
Mike Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:44:15     172.161.120.159
What a crowd!
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:44:09     24.61.129.53
Tott

Dick Z is a VALLEY FORGE former crew member


Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:43:41     12.72.119.37
Jake - I checked out the FORRETAL site but did not get a definitive answer, I e-mailed NASA asking for assistance.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:41:34     12.72.119.37
Larry - thanks - I have finished the job of entering you into the computer so that I do not throw away another scrap of paper with important data on it.
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:40:40     64.12.116.200
Who was looking for sub launches ,unaddressedI also got a double luanch coverof USS WHALE SSN638-with the USS SUNFISH SSN649 gen.dyenamic Quincy Mass.1966
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:39:46     24.61.129.53
Full Table, hope you brought the cards Dick
Dan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:39:18     24.25.181.25
Don't believe I have ever seen 7 at once on the chat.
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:36:59     64.12.116.200
aThe most interisting 1 was the R.M.S. LONDON Mar.26,1941-Norfolk Hit by a U-boat,limped to port at Norfolk

TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:35:30     64.12.116.200
aThe most interisting 1 was the R.M.S. LONDON Mar.26,1941-Norfolk Hit by a U-boat,limped to port at Norfolk

Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:34:58     68.57.210.254
Stew - 11749
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:34:48     24.61.129.53
Hi Dick
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:33:09     24.61.129.53
Tott
Just think about how much you could learn from the likes of Herb and a number of other old timers here Like Dave Kent, Bob Rawlins and many others, course you know Dave used to be here on the Cape way, way back in his youth.
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:33:07     64.12.116.200
aThe most interisting 1 was the R.M.S. LONDON Mar.26,1941-Norfolk Hit by a U-boat,limped to port at Norfolk

Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:32:33     68.9.230.72
C.B. Hall did cachets mostly for ship events in the San Diego and Long Beach areas. Some were specific, some general. I believe he always put his name in the design somewhere.
TOTT43 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:28:21     64.12.116.200
I actually got quite a few Naval covers I picked up a few at Fishkill show
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:27:16     24.61.129.53
Lary Lafoe

Could you use that Jimmy Carter Logo jpg.???


Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:26:10     24.61.129.53
Hi Tott

Think you should think about joining the USCS, sure would like to get you in to more Naval cover collecting


Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:26:00     68.57.210.254
Does anyone know what type of cachets C B Hall did?
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:24:30     24.61.129.53
Stew

Was referring to the Forrestal Web Site
http://www.forrestal.org/

this is a list of her deployments
http://forrestal.org/fidfacts/page10.htm


Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:19:40     12.72.119.37
Be back in a bit - need to check out a hunch
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:17:16     68.9.230.72
Navy ships didn't "just sort of help out" in recovering astronauts. They were specifically assigned to the mission, and NASA paid the Navy the cost of operating the ships for those missions. Obviously any ship that could help out in an emergency would, but if you want a list of ships officially assigned to a mission I would go with what the Navy and NASA say. And I'd want a list that was made after the mission, not before.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:15:53     12.72.119.37
Jake - what web site are you referring to?
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:14:57     12.72.119.37
Dave - I am putting together a Data Sheet on the 238 different ships assigned to recovery ops from the start of the space program until ASTP.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:11:44     24.61.129.53
Stew
No mention of her being involved in the recovery on that web site, actually looks like she was state side before deploying to the Med in August of '62
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:11:18     68.9.230.72
Things weren't as precise in the early days of the space missions. It was difficult to hit the splashdown spots, and the Navy tended to scatter ships all over the ocean looking for astronauts falling out of the sky -- that's how a destroyer came to pick up John Glenn instead of the intended carrier. If FORRESTAL were in the Atlantic on operations, even though not related to the space mission, she probably would have been alerted to the fact of the mission and be asked to help if needed. That doesn't mean she was "assigned" to the mission as such.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:07:20     24.61.129.53
Stew
Check out this site on the Forrestal looks like she well mauy have been

http://forrestal.org/fidfacts/


Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:05:18     12.72.119.37
Hi Dave - I agree with your logic. I am proving the list in Blair's SPLASHDOWN. I've found 10 errors so far. He says that FORRESTAL appears on the list supplied by NASA but not on the list that came with the AP 17 press kit.
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:04:31     68.9.230.72
What's the Data Sheet, Stewart? Maybe the rest of us can help.
Dave Kent Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 21:02:35     68.9.230.72
Stewart: my references say that Scott Carpenter was recovered by USS INTREPID on May 24, 1962. I doubt that two big carriers would have been assigned to the mission.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 20:59:11     12.72.119.37
Was the USS FORRESTAL assined to the Atlantic Task Force for the recovery of Scott Carpenter (MA 7) on May 24, 1962. I need a specific reference for this point as I am working on a Data Sheet.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 20:58:09     12.72.119.37
Larry - please give me your USCS number again. I wrote it down, and then toosed the paper I wrote it on. Thanks
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 20:49:31     24.61.129.53
Herb
Did you try to recurit Brian Totten for the USCS??
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 20:47:59     24.61.129.53
G'Evening Herb
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 20:47:37     24.61.129.53
Hi Mike
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 20:32:15     24.61.129.53
Larry L.
Try this for the jpg

http://navysite.de/ssn/images/ssn23coa.jpg


Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 20:28:55     24.61.129.53
Sorry Larry LaFoe

Should have said that was official Logo not crest.


Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 20:21:54     24.61.129.53
Larry L.

Here is the site that shows the Jimmy C, Crest
http://navysite.de/ssn/ssn23.htm


Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 19:24:14     68.57.210.254
Does anyone have a .jpg or .gif file with the Ship's Crest for the USS Jimmy Carter?

lafoe@comcast.net


Ed 10975 Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 18:10:55     12.76.172.208
Interesting to note that the PC's transferred from the Navy to the Coast Guard have been commissioned in Navy gray rather than Coast Guard white.
Roger Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 17:56:14     69.40.18.134
Larry Lafoe:
I enjoyed our phone conversation today!!
Roger Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 17:52:18     69.40.18.134
Dan:
Talked to Walt Greenman at Groton Monday, and he tells me that he now has one person pretty well trained to do all our covers now. So, we all may now start seeing some consistancy in what we receive. Can't remember her name though. When I talk to Walt next, I'll be sure and write it down this time.

The covers that I got back for the USS TEXAS Launch from Newport News were a total mess!!Every cover went in the circular file.


Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 17:49:39     68.57.210.254
Three Stooges ;-)
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 17:46:01     38.117.188.10
Three at dinner time. It's almost time to sneak out of the office and head to the train.
Dan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 16:56:47     24.25.181.25
Received HARTFORD and AUGUSTA covers today from Groton Post Office. All covers had perfect cancels and were squeeky clean. Patience pays off!
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 10:06:06     38.117.188.10
Today is the fourth anniversary of the collision between USS GREENEVILLE and F/V EHIME MARU.
lBbrennan Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 08:51:45     216.9.242.14
Mike and Steves thanks for advice and encouragement
Mike Kaup Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 01:27:16     4.179.52.162
Larry LaFoe, The Uss Wahoo Vallejo Mare Island Navy Yard Launching cover seems to appear on ebay three or four times a year and usually sell at a low to moderate price. Keep an eye out for it but don't over pay as it does come up often enough to get at a fair price.
Jake Wednesday, February 09, 2005 at 00:19:45     24.61.129.53
Bruce
This site on the Hancock might interest you
http://www.usshancockassociation.org/
Mike Kaup Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 23:19:30     4.179.33.185
Hi Don and Larry.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 23:18:27     68.57.210.254
Good Evening Mike
Mike Kaup Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 23:15:50     4.179.33.185
Hi Don and Larry.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 22:43:58     68.57.210.254
I've bought about 300 unaddressed covers today... still working it! ;-)
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 22:40:24     216.9.242.14
Larry dps covers from en usually are unaddressed
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 22:29:17     68.57.210.254
Stew - Sending you a small order for some of your sub covers.
STEWART B. MILSTEIN Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 22:15:37     12.72.122.19
Good evening, gentlemen.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 21:23:58     68.57.210.254
Found a USS Wahoo (SS-28) Keel Laying cachet dated 7/1/41 cachet by Dr. S. E. Hutnick RCD #70... but it wasn't for sale.
Bruce Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 21:21:43     4.152.21.184
Dave and all -
Thank for the info on HANCOCK CVA-19.
Bruce
Herb rommel Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 21:04:15     68.109.122.54
Larry, what is your address?
Herb
Herb rommel Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 21:01:12     68.109.122.54
Larry: I see you are on with me. I found ONE unaddressed commissioning cover; I will send it to you.
Herb
Ed 10975 Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 18:32:01     12.76.173.116
Article in the current Navy Times about the Phillipine Sea CV47. At different times it was a CV, CVA, CVS.
SteveS Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 17:25:03     65.213.44.9
Both Larry's: I actually had 2 Wahoo launch covers at one time but I gave one away to a friend. I've yet to find any war time mail. Maybe some day I'll stumble on to one.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 17:06:42     68.57.210.254
Roger - Only looking for never addressed covers for commissionings... looking for signed covers for North Pole / Artic deployments.
Roger Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 17:02:02     69.40.18.134
Hi Guys:
Got some USS CONNECTICUT covers back today that I mailed out last August!! The covers had OSC's and C.O. autographs and Corner Cards.
Roger Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 16:59:50     69.40.18.134
Larry Lafoe:
You might think about putting an add in the LOG for what you are trying to find. You may have better luck. Unaddressed submarine covers are hard to find, especailly those that were actually ON THE SUB.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 15:14:13     38.117.188.10
Larry, That is the leading but not only reason why he is no longer with us.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 15:14:12     38.117.188.10
Larry, That is the leading but not only reason why he is no longer with us.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 15:13:40     38.117.188.10
This is a pretty cool button on navy.mil. Here is a way to do historic covers. Looks like my birthday is a bit more musical. Still have never found a cover with the date and year -- it doesn't help to be born on a Sunday.
This Day in Naval History - Sept. 13
Story Number: NNS020724-11
Release Date: 7/24/2002 10:06:00 AM


From the Navy News Service

1814 - British bombardment of Fort McHenry inspires the Star Spangled Banner.
1847 - Marine Brigade leads U.S. forces that storm Chapultepec Castle near Mexico City, inspiring one line of the Marine Hymn.
1906 - Sailors and Marines from USS Denver land in Havana at the request of the Cuban government to preserve order during a revolution.
1939 - Navy suspends transfers to the Fleet Reserve after 20 years of service and retains men on active duty.
1985 - Commander Middle East Force orders escort of Military Sealift Ships in Persian Gulf because of Iranian seizure of merchant vessels.

For more information about naval history, visit the Naval Historical Center Web site at www.history.navy.mil.



Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 15:12:20     68.57.210.254
Must be why they're a former member.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 15:10:56     38.117.188.10
We have a former member who could make the postmark and the cachet if I would just ask. It would be a lot cheaper than the real cost.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 15:09:59     38.117.188.10
I think HANCOCK always was a CV or CVA. INTREPID was a CVS but served in a CVA role off Vietnam. She was one of the most frequent visitors from AIRLANT. In fact the 27 Charlies and their A4 and F8s carried a lot of that bloody air war.
Bon Homme Richard and Oriskany also were two Essex class carriers which probably never became CVS. I can't remember about Ticonderoga but think she may have been a CVS at the end.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 15:08:57     68.57.210.254
Larry B, Surely Steve has a couple extra he can sell ya! ;-)
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 14:30:01     38.117.188.10
Larry L, Be patient, I've been looking for a USS WAHOO cover for nearly 40 years.
Dave Kent Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 14:21:24     68.9.230.72
Bruce: I've tried to find why our Postmark Catalog says that HANCOCK was reclassified as CVS in 1956 when she remained a CVA. All I can find is that this remark was carried over from the previous edition of the Catalog. Apparently no one ever challenged the remark, and the section editor did not verify it when we prepared the new edition. I've look at the USCS LOGs for this period, but there is no mention of a CVS reclassification. I'll make a note to correct this (i.e., remove the remark) for the next edition.
Note to everyone: if you see an error like this in the Catalog, please call it to my attention so we can correct it. Otherwise it's likely to get carried over to the next edition.
lbbrennan Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 10:39:49     38.117.188.10
Navy Leases System to Pump Fuel From Ship to Shore

From Military Sealift Command Public Affairs

WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command (MSC) awarded a $26.6 million contract with options to Edison Chouest Offshore, based in Galliano, La., for the time charter of one Offshore Petroleum Discharge System, or OPDS, in January.

The OPDS consists of two ships - a support ship and a tender - that work together to pump fuel for U.S. military forces from a commercial oil tanker moored at sea to a temporary fuel storage area ashore.

To begin the process, the 348-foot support ship and 165-foot tender work together to install up to eight miles of eight-inch-diameter flexible pipe. Next, the support ship positions the tanker for safe offload operations. While the tender holds the tanker in place, the tanker’s lines connect to the flexible pipe through the support ship. Booster pumps aboard the support ship increase the pressure of fuel, pushing the fuel to shore.

The OPDS is especially valuable in areas where fuel piers are unavailable, and tankers are unable to tie up ashore to offload fuel. The OPDS can pump up to 1.7 million gallons of fuel per day.

Government-owned OPDSs have been deployed since the mid-1980s, but this is the first time that the system has been leased from a private company.

"You never know where you are going to have to operate," said Griff Hume, prepositioning ship project officer. "Offshore Petroleum Discharge Systems enable us to provide fuel, the lifeblood of any military mission or exercise, wherever and whenever it is needed."

The contract includes a time charter for one OPDS for a total of $125.6 million if all option periods are exercised. The Navy has the opportunity to add a second OPDS with option periods, which could raise the contract total to $241 million.

The OPDS will be maintained in the Guam/Saipan area, ready to be deployed worldwide. The first system will be delivered to MSC in October 2006.

MSC ships replenish Navy ships at sea, chart ocean bottoms, conduct undersea surveillance, preposition combat cargo at sea and move 95 percent of military equipment and supplies used by deployed U.S. forces.


Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 10:26:54     68.57.210.254

WANTED TO BUY

Unaddressed Nuclear Submarine Commissioning covers... c'mon, I know someone has them for sale?

lafoe@comcast.net


Roger Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 06:57:00     69.40.18.134
OOOPS! Forgot! Also got some covers back from USS SEA WOLF and USS BREMMERTON with OSCs and C.O. C/Cs on the back of each cover. The BREMMERTON covers were autographed by the C. O. as requested.
Roger Tuesday, February 08, 2005 at 06:50:39     69.40.18.134
Hi Guys:
Got some nicely cancelled covers back on Monday from the USS BONNIE DICK. Type 9 cancels dated 1/28/05, with a sticky note from the PC stating that they were "leaving the area this week". What area??? I assume they mean the Tsunami area??

Also got some from USS LINCOLN dated 1/1/05 with notation on the back "Humanitarian Relief Sumatra Indonesia"


Richard D. Jones 3933 Monday, February 07, 2005 at 21:59:12     67.35.140.20
Carriers:
USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) - port visit, Singapore
Cruisers:
USS Shiloh (CG 67) - port visit, Singapore
Destroyers:
USS Benfold (DDG 65) - port visit, Singapore
USS Shoup (DDG 86) - port visit, Singapore
Amphibious Ships:
USS Essex (LHD 2) - Andaman Sea
USS Fort McHenry (LSD 43) - Andaman Sea
Hospital Ships:
USNS Mercy (T-AH 19) - Andaman Sea
High Speed Vessels:
Westpac Express (HSV) - Gulf of Thailand
Logistics Ships
USNS San Jose (T-AFS 7) - port visit, Singapore
USNS Rainier (T-AOE 7) - port visit, Singapore
USNS John McDonnell (T-AGS 51) - port visit, Singapore
M/V 1st LT Alex Bonnyman (T-AK 3003) - Strait of Malacca
M/V 1st LT Baldomero Lopez (T-AK 3010) - Andaman Sea
M/V 1st LT Jack Lummus (T-AK 3011) - Andaman Sea
Stewart B. Milstein Monday, February 07, 2005 at 20:39:50     12.72.120.219
There are at least 2 mistakes in the SPLASHDOWN book noted in the LOG. One is a type for thre BARRY. It should read DD-932. The other gioves the wrong hull number for the USS HENLEY> It is NOT DD-391 but DD-762.
Dan Monday, February 07, 2005 at 19:28:45     24.25.181.25
Correction: The oil drilling rigs were done by Chinbro Corp at the BIW facility in Portland. I got carried away I guess.
Dan Monday, February 07, 2005 at 18:17:46     24.25.181.25
Hi Ed. BIW says their work force will be about stable until 2009 when the Burke class DDG contract runs out. The DDX would have allowed them to keep most of the employees but it would still be a tight transition. By cutting the DDX program, BIW would have to lay off a huge amount of people. BIW is the largest employer in Maine so the politicians are real uneasy about Bush's budget as, I assume, most of the BIW employees are also. BIW has tried to get merchant shipping and/or foreign naval contracts but can't compete with the low cost foreign shipyards. Their last non-military contract was to complete two oil drilling rigs which are now somewhere of the coast of South America. That project was done in Portland and since the completion, BIW has sold all their land on the Portland waterfront to the city of Portland. It will become a cruise ship and cargo terminal when complete in 2006 and will be called "Oceangate".
e sink Monday, February 07, 2005 at 18:16:38     68.85.255.77
USS BARRY Free frank dtd DEC 28, 2004 (nice clear short bar, type 9 magenta and old cachet for 50th ANNIVERSARY D-DAY INVASION) received end of last week. One of two received and puzzled about length of time from postmark date.

Ed 10975 Monday, February 07, 2005 at 18:06:16     12.76.173.35
Dan Goodwin - What's the story up in Bath? Article in today's Boston Globe that the Bush Administration is trying to cut the SSN and DDG building in half and Bath Iron Works may be the first casualty along with Electric Boat in CT and cuts at Portsmouth Navy Yard.
Larry LaFoe Monday, February 07, 2005 at 13:56:44     68.57.210.254
WANTED TO BUY

Submarine covers with sub fancy/pictorial cancels. (Port Everglades, Commissioning, etc.)

SIGNED Arctic / North Pole Submarine covers.

In addition to buying, I have 8 different CO signed sub covers available for trade.

Thanks!

lafoe@comcast.net


Gregory A. Mews Monday, February 07, 2005 at 13:14:18     65.26.213.150
According to the current PACOM website for Operation Unified Assistance there are only 2 USN ships left in the area: Fort McHenry LSD-43 and Essex LHD-2. There are eight ships altogether in the area however, including 2 USNS Logistics, 1 Survey Ship, 2 HSV and 1 Hospital Ship.
lbbrennan Monday, February 07, 2005 at 11:07:17     38.117.188.10
Whidbey Island, Wash. (Feb. 4, 2005) – The Littoral Surface Craft-Experimental (X-Craft), christened Sea Fighter (FSF 1), at Nichols Bros. Boat Builders in Freeland, Whidbey Island, Wash., will be used to evaluate the hydrodynamic performance, structural behavior, mission flexibility, and propulsion system of high-speed vessels. The X-Craft is a high-speed aluminum catamaran that will test a variety of technologies, which will allow the Navy to operate more effectively in littoral or near-shore waters.
Gregory A. Mews Monday, February 07, 2005 at 10:13:44     65.26.213.150
Roger, ships are beginning to leave the Operations United Assistance "area," the Lincoln among them. Curious if there is a web area where one can find which ships have left the area.
Roger Monday, February 07, 2005 at 08:39:44     69.40.18.134
Greg Mews:
Yes, there is a USS JIMMY CARTER pictorial at Groton.

Tsunami Relief ships are listed in the Feb. LOG on page 16. The operations are called "Operation United Assistance".


Gregory A. Mews Monday, February 07, 2005 at 00:30:26     65.26.213.150
Will there be a cancel available from the Groton postoffice for the Carten Commissioning, and is there a cancel available from the Carter itself that covers can be sent to it?
Gregory A. Mews Monday, February 07, 2005 at 00:29:03     65.26.213.150
Does anyone know of any other ships besides the Lincoln that have left the relief effort-tsunami-zone?
Gregory A. Mews Monday, February 07, 2005 at 00:25:24     65.26.213.150
Hi Robert
Stewart B. Milstein Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 22:44:51     12.72.120.189
Good evening gentlemen, and congrats to the NE fans.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 22:33:28     68.57.210.254
Just think... it should happen again around 2080! ;-)
Ed 10975 Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 22:31:47     12.76.174.22
3 Super Bowls and a World Series in 4 years. Ah, yes.
Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 19:28:55     68.57.210.254
Rich: Sent you two more orders for Decatur cachets.

Capt. Rommel: Thanks for the package. Sending $75 for the 15 covers.


Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 19:11:53     68.57.210.254
Everything I read about her during Vietnam was as CVA-19.

Built by the Bethlehem Steel Co., Quincy, Mass. Laid down as Ticonderoga 26 Jan 1943; renamed Hancock 1 May 1943; launched 24 Jan 1944 and commissioned 15 Apr 1944. Decommissioned to reserve 9 May 1947.

Reconstructed to SCB-27C design by the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Wash. Work began on 15 Dec 1951; redesignated as an "attack carrier" (CVA-19) on 1 Oct 1952 and recommissioned on 15 Feb 1954. Decommissioned again 13 Apr 1956 she received further modernization (project SCB-125) at the San Francisco Naval Shipyard, San Francisco, Cal., and was back in service on 15 Nov 1956.

Reclassified as a "Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier" (CV-19) on 30 June 1975. Decommissioned for the last time on 30 Jan 1976 and struck from the Navy list the following day, she was sold for scrap by the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service (DRMS) on 1 Sep 1976.

http://www.usshancockassociation.org/hancock-history.html

VIETNAM DEPLOYMENT AS CVA-19
12 (tied with Oriskany CVA-34 for most deployments) Last Western Pacific deployment 18 March 1975 - 20 October 1975 Participated in Operation "Eagle Pull" evacuation of Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Operation "Frequent Wind" evacuation of Saigon, South Vietnam in April 1975 One of last Essex class carriers to operate in the attack role.


Bruce Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 18:50:17     4.152.21.94
Hi Larry -

(1) It makes me feel SOOOOO GOOD that eBay's Bill Cobb is looking out for MY interests. Sarcastic grin.

(2) Saw your USCS ad in an eBay item. Applause!

Bruce


Bruce Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 18:48:06     4.152.21.94
Another puzzler. I have a 1962 cover from USS HANCOCK. The USCS catalog calls her CVS-19 from 1956-1975. But I got this note:

"I don't know where you got your information about the USS Hancock, but she was never designated a CVS or ASW carrier. She was always either a CV or a CVA carrier. I proudly served aboard her from June 1968 to Sept 1971 and all the history that I have read about her, no where does it mention her ever being designated a CVS carrier. Go to the USN 20th Century database and check it out. Lawrence."

Can anyone explain this? Was HANCOCK classified CVS but still used as a CVA?

Thanks.

Bruce


Larry LaFoe Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 18:36:46     68.57.210.254
A Message from Bill Cobb (eBay President)

... We also want to do something for the rest of our sellers. I'm happy to announce that effective at midnight tonight, eBay.com and eBay.ca will reduce minimum insertion fees for Auction-Style listings, Fixed Price, Motors Non-Vehicle and B&I non-Capital Equipment Categories from 30 cents to 25 cents (CA$0.35 to CA$0.30). eBay Germany has always used this pricing, and users there have benefited from higher conversion rates on items with lower starting bids.

Sincerely,

Bill Cobb
President
eBay North America


John Lyding Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 17:02:24     66.2.146.125
Hi Larry
I am intrested in the Commissioning Program of the USS MARYLAND and the counter display

John Lyding Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 16:58:25     66.2.146.125
February Log arrived in Maryland on 2/4. Great job
lbbrennan Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 13:53:46     216.9.242.14
Great Feb log
lbbrennan Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 13:50:30     216.9.242.14
Herb great posting intersting details
herb rommel Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 12:01:42     68.109.122.54
Thank you for the photo of Oklahoma. It brings back memories. It is not a recent photo as it has the OS2U biplanes; we had SOC monoplane when she was sunk. There were two catapults, one on top of turret 3 and one on the main deck aft which was mine. The catapult took a 4 inch shell. The pilot revved it up, braced himself and gave a thumbs up signal and I fired him off on the next up-roll.

There is a good book written by a S2c of mine who was in the lower handling room. Trapped at Pearl by Young. In the first edition he called my junior officer Ens Spitler a coward. Spitler sued the Institute and Young and won a judgement. Later editions do not mention Spitler. He was not very kind to me. There are inaccuracies, for instance he says I had a 45 during the attack. This is not true; there is no way I could have gotten my 45 which was locked in my safe. All his conversations are hearsay; he was cut out with 31 others the next day. You can get the book from your library or library loan or order from Institute.

My division officer was Ltjg Forrest Simoneau. He went to sub school and I got the Fourth Division (turret 4). In the middle of the war whenI was exec of Gridley DD380 my ship was in Pearl with USS Argonaut, his ship. He had me for lunch. He said "Herb I can get you on the ship; you don't have to go to sub school anymore". Fortunately I declined; the Argonaut never came back from that next patrol. (Her pre-war cancel is a beauty).
When my WWII command, USS Wilkes DD441 had a reunion in Branson Mo we went to a war museum which claimed to have the name of every person killed in the war on their wall. Sure enough, Forrest Simoneu was on the wall. He had married a Norwegian girl he met on midshipman cruise and his widow went back to Norway.

Again, thank you for the photo which is now on my wall.
Herb Rommel


herb rommel Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 12:01:42     68.109.122.54
Thank you for the photo of Oklahoma. It brings back memories. It is not a recent photo as it has the OS2U biplanes; we had SOC monoplane when she was sunk. There were two catapults, one on top of turret 3 and one on the main deck aft which was mine. The catapult took a 4 inch shell. The pilot revved it up, braced himself and gave a thumbs up signal and I fired him off on the next up-roll.

There is a good book written by a S2c of mine who was in the lower handling room. Trapped at Pearl by Young. In the first edition he called my junior officer Ens Spitler a coward. Spitler sued the Institute and Young and won a judgement. Later editions do not mention Spitler. He was not very kind to me. There are inaccuracies, for instance he says I had a 45 during the attack. This is not true; there is no way I could have gotten my 45 which was locked in my safe. All his conversations are hearsay; he was cut out with 31 others the next day. You can get the book from your library or library loan or order from Institute.

My division officer was Ltjg Forrest Simoneau. He went to sub school and I got the Fourth Division (turret 4). In the middle of the war whenI was exec of Gridley DD380 my ship was in Pearl with USS Argonaut, his ship. He had me for lunch. He said "Herb I can get you on the ship; you don't have to go to sub school anymore". Fortunately I declined; the Argonaut never came back from that next patrol. (Her pre-war cancel is a beauty).
When my WWII command, USS Wilkes DD441 had a reunion in Branson Mo we went to a war museum which claimed to have the name of every person killed in the war on their wall. Sure enough, Forrest Simoneu was on the wall. He had married a Norwegian girl he met on midshipman cruise and his widow went back to Norway.

Again, thank you for the photo which is now on my wall.
Herb Rommel


Roger Sunday, February 06, 2005 at 06:56:52     69.40.22.91
Greg Mews:
Good Eye...I noticed that as well.
Gregory A. Mews Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 22:28:00     65.26.213.150
I see in the Log's Calendar of Events that the USS Kidd's (DDG-100) Christening is dated Feb. 19. The Christening took place on January 24th at Pascagoula.
Stewart B. Milstein Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 21:54:13     12.72.121.59
Hi Ed.
Stewart B. Milstein Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 21:52:54     12.72.121.59
Dave Kent - checked that PM again. It might be 96322. It is not the best cancel.

Cover's rec'd from USS RUSHMORE canceled Jan 11, 2005. The cachet shows the 4 presidents and a starboard silhouette of the ship. It is also from the tsunami relief expedition.

A German collector ordered 105 covers of the OREGON Chapter covers I have for sale. Some ships are ebing deleted from the list. Do not delay in placing your order.


Greg Jacobs Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 21:11:35     67.177.96.92
Herb Rommel: Cover arrived today. Very nice! Just left feedback for you on eBay.
Gregory A. Mews Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 20:37:42     65.26.213.150
I received covers back today (Feb. 5th) from the USS Reagan. I requested Feb. 6th dates, to mark the President's birthday. The are cancelled Feb. 6th. I do have them posted on Ebay. Nice cancels, but the cachet is slowly loosing some of its quality features.
Jake Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 19:07:57     24.61.129.53
G'Evening Larry
Dave Kent Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 18:45:58     68.9.230.72
You're right, Mike. 96322 is the Navy Base at Sasebo, Japan. Some modern postmarks are hard to read.
mike meister Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:56:08     152.163.100.200
that was supposed to be covers flown by HS 2 off the Lincoln
mike meister Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:55:22     152.163.100.200
nd 1 flown on 1/20 carrying 4500lbs of food, water and body bags. both pm on 1/23.
mike meister Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:51:27     152.163.100.200
believe that FPO 96322 is either Hong Kong or Sasabo Japan

Dan Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:50:44     24.25.181.25
I'm so used to just popping onto the chat that I forget there is a wealth of other information on the site also.
Greg Jacobs Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:48:25     67.177.96.92
Yes, Dave. I'll be there on time.
Dan Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:46:39     24.25.181.25
Duh, If I had looked in the list of scans I would have saved a lot of typing. Thanks for the reminder Steve.
Chas Henry Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:28:54     64.168.104.154
Notice via AP that the LINCOLN is now headed for Singapore, on her way home to Everett.
SteveS Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 15:06:54     4.246.0.71
Dan, the cancel sounds like the Type 11 shown on the postmark project on the home page. (Look under Bunker Hill.) If it is different, please scan yours and send it to Dave Kent.

Charles, I mailed applications to you today.

Rich, I'll mail a box of applications to you next week when I can get away from work to go to the Post Office.


Dave Kent Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 13:09:36     68.9.230.72
Stewart: there is no ZIP Code 98322. Look at it again. If it's 09832, that's El Gorah, Sinai, Israel. FPO 96534 is at Singapore.
Dave Kent Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 13:02:02     68.9.230.72
Hi, Greg. Ready for the Nathan Hale Chapter meeting tomorrow? We meet at 1:00 so we can get home for the Super Bowl.
Dan Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 12:42:39     24.25.181.25
Does BUNKER HILL have a new cancel? The one I received today has two lines at the top. The second line is "CG-52 FPO-AP" and is in very small letters. The cover was beat to pieces in the mail system and the strike is off center so much that I can't tell if it has killer bars or not. I'll keep it for a few days in case anyone wants a scan and then it's off to the trash.
Roger Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 05:42:13     69.40.22.91
Stew Milestein:
Thanks for the Zip Codes for the two USNS's.
Roger Saturday, February 05, 2005 at 05:36:10     69.40.22.91
Dave Kent:
Thank you for the zip info. Any chance that you could publish that numerical listings by coast and alphabet system in the LOG??? Our USCS LOG zip code list has errors every year and some years the exact same ones from the previous year, even though corrections were passed along. Problem is, who does one trust as accurate, the LOG list or what is on a ship's website...because both have had errors. Even the list that one can get from the Navy Pentagon/Office of Information has errors. We can put a man on the moon, but we can't keep up with where our ships are home ported! LOL!!
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 04, 2005 at 21:16:21     12.72.119.100
LOG rec's in AZ today. It makes very interesting reading.
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 04, 2005 at 21:14:41     12.72.119.100
Good evening, gentlemen.
lbbrennan Friday, February 04, 2005 at 20:28:18     216.9.242.14
Carl Vinson semicievnavigation to nnansndddvo probably follows 6 plus month deployment
Dan Friday, February 04, 2005 at 19:23:03     24.25.181.25
Got the NITZE address from their website.
Stewart B. Milstein Friday, February 04, 2005 at 19:14:37     12.72.119.170
2 sets of 2 covers rec'd from the tsunami relief expedition.
1. USNS JOHN ERICSSON -canceled US Navy Jan 24, 2005 FPO 98322. In the upper left hand corner is a rectangle with the ship's name, hull number and address and it is stamped "MASTER."
2. USS TIPPECANOE - canceled Jan 25, 2004 (note wrong year)FPO 96534. There is a 3 line corner card, Master, ship name & hull #, and FPO. The cover also carries the eship's embossed seal.
Can any one tell me where the 2 FPOs are located?
Dave Kent Friday, February 04, 2005 at 19:06:30     68.9.230.72
All ships in the Atlantic whose name begins with "N" use the ZIP Code 09579.
Duane Wilson Friday, February 04, 2005 at 18:57:14     204.124.93.249
Spent the week in Hawthorne, NV; Home of the first Naval Ammunition Depot. The Depot was turned over to the army in 1977 and is now run by a private contractor. Interesting place; like something out of a Stephen King novel.
Ed 10975 Friday, February 04, 2005 at 18:45:30     12.76.172.48
How long will the Vinson deployment be? Rumors are that it will be in England in June for the Trafalgar festival.
lbbrennan Friday, February 04, 2005 at 17:58:35     38.117.188.10
I assume that the question concerns the famous WWII Army Air Corps aviator Colin Kelly who became a legend for crashing his aircraft into a Japanese ship in the Pacific in the dark early days of WWII. The story was a bit of an exaggeration. The item appears to be an article authored by Alan. Funny result from editing.
It's like the resturant special, "half roasted chicken." Half cooked or half a chicken.


lbbrennan Friday, February 04, 2005 at 17:54:30     38.117.188.10
The crew of USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) mans the rails as the vessel departs Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, Calif., on Feb. 1, 2005, for a regularly scheduled deployment. Upon completion of this deployment, Vinson will shift its homeport from Bremerton, Wash., to Norfolk, Va., to undergo a refueling and complex overhaul. This three-year maintenance period will virtually turn the ship into a new carrier with some of the most modern equipment in the Navy and allow it to serve at least another 25 years
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 04, 2005 at 15:52:04     68.57.210.254
I can't wait to get my LOG... who is Colin Kelley and why is he attacking the Al(l)an's of the world?
Roger Friday, February 04, 2005 at 15:42:45     69.40.22.91
LOG arrive in North Georgia today.
Roger Friday, February 04, 2005 at 15:42:22     69.40.22.91
Dan:
Are you sure about that NITZE zip code? The Jan. LOG's zip code listing shows 0957"9" is for the USS NORFOLK.
Larry LaFoe Friday, February 04, 2005 at 15:09:14     68.57.210.254
I hope I just had my one eBay nut for the year!

She sent payment to PayPal under lafoe@paypal.com... I guess she assumes anyone with a paypal account has to have a @paypal.com e-mail address? Then she went on a tangent of how they are 6 hours earlier in Italy and told me it was 1:05 a.m. here when it was 1:05 p.m.? Then she got made at me and told me it was my fault she sent the money to the wrong PayPal account and that I couldn't tell time or understand english... she asked me if I was from Japan or Australia - if so, she wanted to know why my listing said USA.

It's deals that these that created the cliche: 1 aw sheet erases 100 attaboys!


Greg Jacobs Friday, February 04, 2005 at 15:07:16     67.177.96.92
Hi, Larry.
Rich Hoffner Friday, February 04, 2005 at 14:45:27     151.197.61.120
News from Marinette Marine, (via John Young) that launch of CGC MACKINAW WLBB-30 is delayed to April 2. A cancel was submitted to the post office for the original date of March 19. Will be interesting what we go through to get the cancel changed. I might end up paying for the one with the wrong date!
Rich Hoffner Friday, February 04, 2005 at 14:43:16     151.197.61.120
Covers arrived today from Groton post office for the USS HARTFORD anniversary. Event was December 10. Every cancel was perfect. Guess they are "catching up". They returned my check for the cancellation fee, I guess it was returned because it took them so long to return the covers.
Greg Jacobs Friday, February 04, 2005 at 13:55:42     67.177.96.92
Dave Kent: Haven't you heard the old navy saying "If at first you don't launch then launch, launch again"?
Dan Friday, February 04, 2005 at 13:53:24     24.25.181.25
Mailing address for USS NITZE is FPO AE 09579-1200
Dave Kent Friday, February 04, 2005 at 13:10:42     68.9.230.72
Dan: now that I've got your e-mail address I can't find those South Portland, Maine covers. Drat! Be patient.
Dave Kent Friday, February 04, 2005 at 13:09:30     68.9.230.72
You'd be surprised to know how many collectors, even knowledgable ones, think that "first day cover" is a generic term for any kind of cover. I've even seen ship launching covers with cachets that say "first day of launch," leading me to wonder if there's a "second day of launch", and so on. eBay obviously asked for advice from experts before setting up the "Event Covers" and "Postal History" categories, but a lot of sellers put little effort into finding the right category for what they want to sell. I always browse through their (giagantic!) category list to try to select the best place to sell something.
Roger Friday, February 04, 2005 at 07:45:19     69.40.22.91
Got some USS LINCOLN covers back from PC3 Brian Pena Pena yesterday with a notation on the back..."off the coast of Thailand" and " enroute Thailand".

Roger Friday, February 04, 2005 at 07:43:19     69.40.22.91
Lector Orrick:
I have noticed that some sellers on Ebay put naval covers in the wrong categories on Ebay. I have found gobs of them in the pre 1951 FDC covers and 1951-present FDC covers categories. One can find them by typing in "navy" into the search box in these categories. Strange that sellers would put them into the wrong cover categories. They should be in the covers events category, where most naval collectors search for naval covers.
Roger Friday, February 04, 2005 at 06:16:21     69.40.22.91
Chas Henry:
I sent PC3 Brian Pena Pena a application and a copy of a back LOG issue several weeks ago, around Chritmas time.
e sink Friday, February 04, 2005 at 00:50:52     68.85.255.77
Chas: Recently also received covers back from PC3 Pena with nicely applied cachet and notation on back of one "off Indian coast" and "in Indian Ocean" on back of other.
Chas Henry Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 23:31:08     64.168.104.154
Well, I take it all back - just received my cover from the LINCOLN (with cachet stamped on the front) and a nice letter from PC3 Brian Pena. They've probably been swamped with rescue operations and he's "counting the days" til they head back home...Also, "Forgive me for the lack of knowledge but what is the USCS?" So I'm sending him my brochure/ap - maybe Steve could send me a few more...He closes with "Take care and God bless"...Smooth sailing, Brian.
Jake Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 21:04:40     24.61.129.53
Steve & Larry

Thanks for your input about the NPC Group and sorry to hear you received no rplies to your inquiries.

If you don't mind I'll take a shot at it, as several of htose who are active in that group were at FPO 214 the same years that I was there and we worked toogether on incoming and out going mail. It was one of those PCs that hung the handle of "Jake the Snake" on me


Jake Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 20:50:05     24.61.129.53
Hi Dick
Dan Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 20:32:18     24.25.181.25
Dave: my email is dgoodwi3@maine.rr.com
Dave Kent Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 20:29:20     68.9.230.72
Dan: I have a couple of covers for launchings in South Portland, Maine in 1945. What's your e-mail?
e sink Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 20:18:39     68.85.255.77
http://www.news.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=16752
Interesting navy mail postal operations in tsunami area on above website at Navy News Stand

tott43 Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 20:11:29     64.12.116.200
To Capt H Rommel. THANK YOU /OK RECIVED TODAY
Dan Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 16:35:05     24.25.181.25
Looking for covers related to shipbuilding in South Portland, Maine during 1940-1945.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 13:35:23     67.177.96.92
The February log just arrived. I'm off to do some reading.
Chas Henry Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 13:23:30     64.168.104.154
This just spotted on Military.com - Since arriving on station off the coast of Sumatra, Indonesia, USS ESSEX (LHD-2) has delivered more than 500 tons of humanitarian aid to tsunami survivors in the northern areas of the island.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 13:14:54     67.177.96.92
Steve Shay: thanks! I just saw my cover in the 1900 decade. Looks great.
Greg Jacobs Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 13:13:41     67.177.96.92
Larry: Yes, and the satellite clearly shows the storm. I don't know what local channel Dave was watching (we are just a few miles apart) but WFSB clearly showed the storm on their forecast.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 12:51:53     68.57.210.254
Don't we have satellites?
Dave Kent Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 12:34:40     68.9.230.72
That big Atlantic Ocean storm in trying to sneak back into New England. The TV weatherman said last night, "Of course we don't have radar out in the ocean" to explain why we couldn't see it on radar. Well, we used to. They were Navy radar picket ships, although I believe they were looking for intruding Ruskies, not snow storms.
Dave Kent Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 12:31:24     68.9.230.72
I believe Lorraine Kozicki has stopped doing auctions. Years of smoking have gotten to her and she had to sell the house and move into a rehab facility. I believe her personal collection, and with it the auction inventory, was sold to a USCS dealer.
Lector Orrick Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 11:39:46     24.126.82.247
As an Ebay Vendor, of sorts, I send out USCS Recruiting Brochures to successful bidder/winners. I keep a current copy of the USCS Directory handy to make sure I am not sending the brochure needlessly to a member. I also include a note that I have a sample past issue of the USCS Log for $2.00 Post Paid. I have had alot of "takers". My past Logs just sit in a file cabinet and this seems to be putting them to good use. The last Log had alot of recruiting ideas "floated" using issues or subscriptions of the Log and I guess this could be added to the mix of ideas. I have sent out 40 or so in a little over three years. Early on, got a few new members but lately nothing from what I can tell.
Lector Orrick Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 11:06:34     24.126.82.247
Ebay Naval cover activity seems to be way down. As an Ebay Vendor, of sorts, I have noticed a big drop in overall naval cover listings. I can't judge bidding activity since the "good stuff" always gets plenty of attention. I don't have any "good stuff" remaining to list so maybe that is the problem.
Larry LaFoe Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 09:12:18     68.57.210.254
Dear eBay Seller,

Recently, we announced fee changes taking effect on February 18th and affecting certain optional listing upgrades on eBay.com, the subscription fee for a Basic eBay Store, and Final Value Fees on Store Inventory Format listings. Based on Community input, we understand our original communication was a bit unclear.

To clarify, no changes are being made to the Final Value Fees on Auction-style, Auction with Buy It Now option, and Fixed Priced listings (with the exception of certain Business & Industrial capital equipment categories). Final Value Fee changes apply only to Store Inventory Format listings, a listing format only available to Store sellers and with durations of 30, 60, 90, and 120 days and Good 'Til Cancelled.

The Final Value Fees for Auction-style listings, Auction with Buy It Now option, and Fixed Price listings have remained unchanged since 2002.

You can view the full details of the pricing announcement here.

Regards,

eBay


Chas Henry Thursday, February 03, 2005 at 01:08:06     64.168.104.154
Just received the APS journal and have to applaud their fine article on cacheted covers ("Art and Envelopes") by Wayne Youngblood. However, some eyebrows might arch at this point: "Little has been written on other more contemporary non-philatelic items that have artwork on them."... Oh?! Is that a cue for some naval cancellation "exposure"? Anyway, the illos are fantastic and indeed, illustrative!
Ed Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 22:30:01     12.76.172.61
Does Lorraine still have her auction?
SteveS Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 21:52:33     4.246.235.74
3000 circuits is an impressive number. Thanks for your hard work Stewart. That also says something for our Society, that's a lot of member involvement with circuits too. I echo your thoughts about giving something back to a society that has provided me with so much.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 21:30:43     68.57.210.254
Stew - Congratulations on 3000 circuits. That's a mind-boggling achievement!
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 21:14:53     12.72.118.249
Sometime in the next few days I am hoping to send out the 3000th circuit since I tookm on the Sales Circuit. I still remember the day that i complained about the Sales Circuit to Lorraine Kozicki. Her response was, "Can you do a better job?" Isaid, "yes" and 3000 circuits later I am still glad that she "volunteered" me for the job. I have met some wonderful people, seen some great covers, and made some wonderful friends. For all the work involved in the circuit, I am glad to be able to give something back to an orgainzation that has provided me with so many rewards.
Stewart B. Milstein Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 21:11:50     12.72.118.249
Hi Larry.
SteveS Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 20:10:05     4.246.87.78
Don't forget that Karcher also did many, many legitimate covers, not all are fake. The Free Franks are all suspicious though.
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 20:04:12     67.177.96.92
Fred was notorious for faking covers.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 20:03:47     68.57.210.254
Nevermind... I figured it out. Fake Free Franked Vietnam-era covers.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 19:54:47     68.57.210.254
Who is Fred Karcher?
john young Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 19:39:59     68.193.177.218
Larry Lafoe: Visited ebay and saw that you
bid on a selection of naval covers in an album.
I wish to warn you that the first two covers
shown were done by Fred Karcher. Buyer beware!

Roger Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 18:16:04     69.40.26.128
Is anybody going to Atlanta in February for the APS Show? Paul Huber will be there. I am meeting with three of my southern customers there for lunch as well, and a new customer that I am recruiting to join the USCS...gonna take him to Paul's table and educate him on naval covers.
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 16:28:29     67.177.96.92
Sloooow day on the board!
Greg Jacobs Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 10:18:57     67.177.96.92
Larry: commissioning programs seem to sell well on eBay.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 09:47:22     68.57.210.254
SteveS - We can staff a table at INDYPEX '05 on Friday and Saturday (July 8-9).
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 08:54:14     68.57.210.254
The guy with the group of photos/programs below also has a large group of Electric Boat covers from the 30s / 40s... anyone interested?
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 08:51:58     68.57.210.254
SteveS - Copied you on the e-mail I sent to the NPCA
SteveS Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 08:51:40     65.213.44.9
Larry, regarding the shows you attend and USCS. Leaving applications and or Logs on a table at the show has not been a very successful means of recruiting in the past. The material gets taken but no one signs up. By far the most successful method is when we have had a table staffed with members who can talk to folks who walk up, much as you did in Indianapolis. If you'd like some more applications to put out at some shows to give it a try, let me know. If you'd like to staff a table at a show sometime, we have some materials that could be used.
SteveS Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 08:46:19     65.213.44.9
Jake and Larry, I have written the Navy Postal Clerk group a couple of times over the past few years. They hold annual reunion/conventions and I've sent sample Logs and applications and asked if they would be interested in more Logs and applications to have on hand at the convention. To date, I have never even received a response to my letters and none of the applications I mailed came back with new members. You'd think some of the members might be interested. If someone else would like to give it a shot, please be my guest.
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 08:40:08     68.57.210.254
Is anyone interested in this stuff:

Programs
(4) USS Maryland commissioning program
(1) USS Seahorse launch program
(1) USS Bancroft launch program

General Dynamics 8x10 Photos
(7) USS Greenling launching at Groton
(4) USS Skipjack underway
(3) USS Seawolf underway
(4) USS Triton underway
(2) USS George Washington underway
(4) USS Tullibee underway
(6) USS Skate breaking ice

Larger General Dynamics Photos
(3) USS Georgia
(2) USS Tecumseh
(2) USS Ohio
(2) USS New York City
(1) USS Nevada
(4) USS Maine
(4) USS Columbia
(1) USS Philadelphia
(1) USS Hartford
(2) Nuclear Subs Delivered 1981
(2) USS Dallas
(1) USS Providence
(3) USS Kentucky
(3) USS Florida
(4) USS Helena
(1) USS Santa Fe
(5) Trident Ship Characteristics
(3) USS Passadena
(1) USS Minneapolis
(2) USS Indianapolis
(1) USS Phoenix
(1) Leading the way at Electric Boat
(1) Watercolor counter display of three subs


Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 08:12:00     68.57.210.254
This is not a photo of the WESTERN PLAINS... but it is the same ship, built the same year in the same yard.

WESTERN MAID

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-civil/civsh-w/wn-maid.htm


lbbrennan Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 07:16:29     38.117.188.10
WESTERN PLAINS has some of the Hog Islander specs, beam and draft but the loa is a bit off. The era and building seem consistent. Nothing about her in 1939 as a US Flag ship. Perhaps ABS RECORD or Lloyd's Register might have something . Photos are going to be hard to find, however.
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 07:09:26     38.117.188.10
I'm probably wrong about WESTERN PLAINS being a Hog Islander but here is a good website for US merchant ships lost in WWI and II and ships taken over by the Navy.

http://www.usmm.org/ships.html


Roger Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 06:30:31     69.40.26.128
Larry Lafoe:
Lector Orrick has some Gahmale's for sale.
His email is col_lector@yahoo.com....yes, there is an underline betweeen the l's.
Roger Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 06:26:57     69.40.26.128
Larry Lafoe:
Paul Huber has a ton of Crosby's. He'll be in Atlanta for the APS convention on Feb 18/19/20.
lbbrennan Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 06:03:56     216.9.242.14
Western plains sounds like a hog islander
Jake Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 01:02:12     24.61.129.53
Larry
the one you posted is the same one I have
Jake Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 00:58:44     24.61.129.53
Larry
here is the URL for their message board
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/navypostalclerks/message/397

Jake Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 00:55:12     24.61.129.53
Larry
I'll post the URL for the Postal Clerks site
Larry LaFoe Wednesday, February 02, 2005 at 00:35:05     68.57.210.254
Jake - That's really a neat site! They have only 138 members...but the website is SOOOO Good! I saw a Chief’s quilt for sale in their ship’s store… it made me reminisce about my olden days in the Nav!

I was trying so hard to be the first in the Navy to get my Cutlass, Air and Dolphin pins... Joined in '81, got my Cutlasses in '84, my Air Warfare in '87 and had applied to the Submarine Force but made - non-nuke - ETC(AW/SW) in '90... they accepted my app to subs around the same time, but I had to choose between subs and making Chief. At the same time, my father had his third heart-attack and I decided to get out of the Navy and return home. I wish I had gotten my Dolphins now… my father has been RV'ing year round now since '92! The grass is always greener on the other side of the guard rail!


Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:54:42     68.57.210.254
Here's the contact for a FREE ad:

PCC Grover McLaughlin will be the new Editor/Publisher for the NPCA
Newsletter and Mail Directory. If you see something wrong in this Directory or know of another Postal Clerk that's not listed, please contact Mac at below:

PCC Grover McLaughlin
13079 Feather Ridge Drive
San Antonio, TX 78233
Ph: 210-654-8556
g.mclaughlin@sbcglobal.net


Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:53:39     68.57.210.254
Is this it:

http://www.npcreunion.dreamhost.com/

It says: Past AND Present Navy and Marine Corps Postal Clerks...


Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:53:25     12.72.122.205
Or does PC = Postal Clerk?

I've 2 circuits to get out. Good night, gentlemen.


Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:52:34     68.57.210.254
Navy Personal Computers have their own website?
Jake Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:48:08     24.61.129.53
Hi Stew
Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:47:44     12.72.122.205
Hi Robert.
Jake Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:44:26     24.61.129.53
G'Evening Gentlemen
Jake Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:42:38     24.61.129.53
Steve Shay

Are you aware that retired Navy PC have an on line web site?

Might this be a place to look for new members?


Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:41:01     68.57.210.254
Hey Stew
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:40:52     68.57.210.254
Maybe I'll get a photo of the Western Plains in the collection of 4,000+ Official US Photos I purchased from the 1930s-1950s?
Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:40:11     12.72.122.205
Hi Larry.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:39:55     68.57.210.254
ID # 3741: Western Plains. 12,185-ton freighter, 1918. USN: Western Plains, 1918-1919. No image available
Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:39:38     12.72.122.205
Cover rec'd from USS MILIUS with a clean jan 10, 2005 cancel.The ship was involved in the tsunami relief effort though there is no such indication on the cover save my pencilled note on the back.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:38:57     68.57.210.254
Western Plains

(Freighter: t. 12,185; l. 423'9"; b. 54'0"; dph. 29'9"; dr. 24' ½ " (mean); s. 10.5 k.; cpl. 70)

Western Plains—a single-screw, steel-hulled cargo vessel constructed in 1918 under a United States Shipping Board contract at Portland, Oreg., by the Columbia River Shipbuilding Corp.—was taken over by the Navy for service with the Naval Overseas Transportation Service (NOTS); designated Id. No. 3741; and commissioned on 17 October 1918, Lt. Comdr. David C. Austin, USNRF, in command.

Western Plains took on board 7,296 tons of flour, got underway for the east coast on 25 October, transited the Panama Canal, and reached New York exactly one month later. After she unloaded her consignment of flour at New York, she pressed on for Gibraltar where she took on cargo for shipment to Turkey and arrived at Constantinople on 25 January 1919. Western Plains delivered her goods; loaded 2,500 tons of Turkish tobacco; sailed for the United States on 24 February; touched at the Azores; and arrived at Philadelphia on 10 April. Western Plains was decommissioned there on 30 April 1919 and returned to the Shipping Board on the same day. She remained in the custody of that agency until abandoned in 1933


Stewart B. Milstein Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 23:38:38     12.72.122.205
Hi Jake.
Rich H Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 21:58:50     151.197.61.120
Anyone have any info on USS WESTERN PLAINS (ID3741) for my chapters most senior member Sidney Fingerhood. He does not use computers. He is looking for a source for a picture. He has a cover from 1918. Incidently, Sidney reports a USS SMITH THOMPSON with a Russian port in killer bars dated 1/12/21 went for $575 in a Robert Siegel auction in December plus commission.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 19:55:02     68.57.210.254
USS Cacapon:

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-usn/usnsh-c/ao52.htm

http://www.antiquesofthesea.com/usscacapon.html


Dave Kent Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 19:04:11     68.9.230.72
Larry gets the gold star.
I've never tried to use the Wickipedia's list of Navy ships, but the total number of ships that has sefved in the Navy is staggering, and I doubt that anyone would try to list them all. The Navy's own historical data base, the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships, fills eight thick, heavy volumes.
prometheus Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 18:43:08     4.247.188.45
Here is the USS PHILADELHHIA
cover I mentioned
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/ProsStamps/two/batch6-05009.jpg
Paul Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 17:57:01     4.244.93.143
Larry, Thanks. I am sure that is it. The reason I did not find it on the Wickipedia List of US Navy ships is that it is not listed. Is there a more complete list somewhere on the www?


Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 16:53:53     68.57.210.254
USS CACAPON
Paul Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 16:47:06     4.244.87.193
Dave, I have posted a scan at http://home.ionet.net/~paroales/Acapo001.jpg.
Thanks, Paul
Dave Kent Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 16:32:39     68.9.230.72
Paul: post a scan somewhere so we can look at it.
Paul Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 15:36:20     4.244.171.143
ID REQUEST. I have a Jun 1 1957 ship cancel that I cannot read. The ship appears to be the U.S.S. -ACAPO- (with - meaning I cannot read the letter). I have checked the Wickipedia List of US Navy ships but cannot find any with those letters in the middle of its name. Does anybody have any guesses as to what ship it is?
prometheus Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 13:53:52     4.247.215.252
Richard Jones - Thansk Very Much
Did not know to look under Gunboats.
Hope you all saw the Nice USS Phildelpia Cover I linked at Stampchat+ The other day,
official Envelope with HI Stamps added because foriegn mail. To the Light House Commader in NY
Neat item.


lbbrennan Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 11:45:45     38.117.188.10
Larry L. You probably won't get this from Navy under FOIA, it's protected by Privacy Act and there is a lot of sensitivtiy. A way around may be to contact SUBLANT and SUBPAC PAOs or the Squadron PAOs, if you know, and tell them your purpose, enclose photocopies of the covers, and ask if they could arrange to have them delivered to the exCOs. It's a risky way to lose them but the best I can conjecture under present circumstances.
Larry LaFoe Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 08:01:18     68.57.210.254
Does anyone have any Crosby, Gmahle or Kenick SUBMARINE covers for sale? lafoe@comcast.net
Richard D. Jones 3933 Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 00:01:12     67.35.139.73
Prometheus
Photos at this
http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/3604.htm